Faculty of Social Sciences, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan.
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 6;25:e45705. doi: 10.2196/45705.
Technology can assist in providing effective infectious disease management, but it can also become a source of social injustice and inequality. To control the rapidly increasing SARS-CoV-2 infections and promote effective vaccine administration, both South Korea and Japan have been using several technology-based systems and mobile apps. However, their different approaches to technology use have yielded contrasting social implications.
Through comparative studies of the use of digital technologies for pandemic management and its social implications in Japan and South Korea, this study aimed to discuss whether the active and optimal use of technology for pandemic management can occur without subverting or compromising important social values, such as privacy and equality.
This study compared the social implications of Japan's and South Korea's contrasting approaches to technology implementation for COVID-19 pandemic management in early 2022.
Digital technologies have been actively and comprehensively used in South Korea, enabling effective COVID-19 management, but have raised serious concerns about privacy and social equality. In Japan, technologies have been more carefully implemented, thereby not causing similar social concerns, but their effectiveness in supporting COVID-19 regulations has been criticized.
Potential social implications such as equality concerns, the balance between public interest and individual rights, and legal implications must be carefully assessed in conjunction with effective and optimal infectious disease control to achieve sustainable use of digital health technologies for infectious disease management in the future.
技术可以协助提供有效的传染病管理,但也可能成为社会不公和不平等的根源。为了控制 SARS-CoV-2 感染的迅速增加并促进有效的疫苗接种,韩国和日本都在使用几种基于技术的系统和移动应用程序。然而,它们对技术使用的不同方法产生了截然不同的社会影响。
通过对日本和韩国在大流行管理中使用数字技术及其社会影响的比较研究,本研究旨在讨论在不颠覆或损害隐私和平等等重要社会价值观的情况下,是否可以积极、优化地利用技术进行大流行管理。
本研究于 2022 年初比较了日本和韩国在新冠疫情管理中对技术实施的不同方法所产生的社会影响。
韩国积极全面地利用数字技术有效地管理了 COVID-19,但引发了对隐私和社会平等的严重关切。在日本,技术的实施更为谨慎,因此没有引起类似的社会关注,但人们批评其在支持 COVID-19 法规方面的有效性。
在未来,为了实现数字健康技术在传染病管理中的可持续利用,必须结合有效和优化的传染病控制,仔细评估潜在的社会影响,如平等问题、公共利益与个人权利之间的平衡以及法律影响。