Suppr超能文献

数字技术在 COVID-19 管理中的应用意义:日本和韩国的比较研究。

The Implications of Using Digital Technologies in the Management of COVID-19: Comparative Study of Japan and South Korea.

机构信息

Faculty of Social Sciences, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 6;25:e45705. doi: 10.2196/45705.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Technology can assist in providing effective infectious disease management, but it can also become a source of social injustice and inequality. To control the rapidly increasing SARS-CoV-2 infections and promote effective vaccine administration, both South Korea and Japan have been using several technology-based systems and mobile apps. However, their different approaches to technology use have yielded contrasting social implications.

OBJECTIVE

Through comparative studies of the use of digital technologies for pandemic management and its social implications in Japan and South Korea, this study aimed to discuss whether the active and optimal use of technology for pandemic management can occur without subverting or compromising important social values, such as privacy and equality.

METHODS

This study compared the social implications of Japan's and South Korea's contrasting approaches to technology implementation for COVID-19 pandemic management in early 2022.

RESULTS

Digital technologies have been actively and comprehensively used in South Korea, enabling effective COVID-19 management, but have raised serious concerns about privacy and social equality. In Japan, technologies have been more carefully implemented, thereby not causing similar social concerns, but their effectiveness in supporting COVID-19 regulations has been criticized.

CONCLUSIONS

Potential social implications such as equality concerns, the balance between public interest and individual rights, and legal implications must be carefully assessed in conjunction with effective and optimal infectious disease control to achieve sustainable use of digital health technologies for infectious disease management in the future.

摘要

背景

技术可以协助提供有效的传染病管理,但也可能成为社会不公和不平等的根源。为了控制 SARS-CoV-2 感染的迅速增加并促进有效的疫苗接种,韩国和日本都在使用几种基于技术的系统和移动应用程序。然而,它们对技术使用的不同方法产生了截然不同的社会影响。

目的

通过对日本和韩国在大流行管理中使用数字技术及其社会影响的比较研究,本研究旨在讨论在不颠覆或损害隐私和平等等重要社会价值观的情况下,是否可以积极、优化地利用技术进行大流行管理。

方法

本研究于 2022 年初比较了日本和韩国在新冠疫情管理中对技术实施的不同方法所产生的社会影响。

结果

韩国积极全面地利用数字技术有效地管理了 COVID-19,但引发了对隐私和社会平等的严重关切。在日本,技术的实施更为谨慎,因此没有引起类似的社会关注,但人们批评其在支持 COVID-19 法规方面的有效性。

结论

在未来,为了实现数字健康技术在传染病管理中的可持续利用,必须结合有效和优化的传染病控制,仔细评估潜在的社会影响,如平等问题、公共利益与个人权利之间的平衡以及法律影响。

相似文献

4
Toward better pandemic governance and preparedness: South Korea's whole-of-nation approach to COVID-19.
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 6;24(1):2126. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19655-8.
6
Response to COVID-19 in South Korea and implications for lifting stringent interventions.
BMC Med. 2020 Oct 9;18(1):321. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01791-8.
8
Digital contact tracing technologies in epidemics: a rapid review.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 18;8(8):CD013699. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013699.
9
Systematic assessment of South Korea's capabilities to control COVID-19.
Health Policy. 2021 May;125(5):568-576. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.02.011. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
10
Understanding South Korea's Response to the COVID-19 Outbreak: A Real-Time Analysis.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 21;17(24):9571. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249571.

本文引用的文献

1
A Survey on Security and Privacy Issues in Contact Tracing Application of Covid-19.
SN Comput Sci. 2021;2(3):136. doi: 10.1007/s42979-021-00520-z. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
3
Information technology solutions, challenges, and suggestions for tackling the COVID-19 pandemic.
Int J Inf Manage. 2021 Apr;57:102287. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102287. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
5
COVID-19 Contact-Tracing Technology: Acceptability and Ethical Issues of Use.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020 Sep 18;14:1639-1647. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S276183. eCollection 2020.
6
Digital technologies in the public-health response to COVID-19.
Nat Med. 2020 Aug;26(8):1183-1192. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-1011-4. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
7
Ethical guidelines for COVID-19 tracing apps.
Nature. 2020 Jun;582(7810):29-31. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-01578-0.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验