• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Implications of Using Digital Technologies in the Management of COVID-19: Comparative Study of Japan and South Korea.数字技术在 COVID-19 管理中的应用意义:日本和韩国的比较研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 6;25:e45705. doi: 10.2196/45705.
2
Citizen-Centered Mobile Health Apps Collecting Individual-Level Spatial Data for Infectious Disease Management: Scoping Review.以公民为中心的移动健康应用程序收集传染病管理的个体层面空间数据:范围综述。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Nov 10;8(11):e22594. doi: 10.2196/22594.
3
Short- and Long-Term Predicted and Witnessed Consequences of Digital Surveillance During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Scoping Review.新冠疫情期间数字监控的短期和长期预测及见证后果:范围综述。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 May 24;10:e47154. doi: 10.2196/47154.
4
Toward better pandemic governance and preparedness: South Korea's whole-of-nation approach to COVID-19.迈向更好的大流行治理和防范:韩国应对 COVID-19 的全民方法。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 6;24(1):2126. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19655-8.
5
Contextual Acceptance of COVID-19 Mitigation Mobile Apps in the United States: Mixed Methods Survey Study on Postpandemic Data Privacy.美国 COVID-19 缓解移动应用程序的使用背景:后疫情时代数据隐私的混合方法调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 29;26:e57309. doi: 10.2196/57309.
6
Response to COVID-19 in South Korea and implications for lifting stringent interventions.韩国对 COVID-19 的应对措施及放宽严格干预措施的影响。
BMC Med. 2020 Oct 9;18(1):321. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01791-8.
7
Adoption of Digital Technologies in Health Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Systematic Review of Early Scientific Literature.新冠疫情期间医疗保健领域数字技术的应用:早期科学文献的系统综述
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 6;22(11):e22280. doi: 10.2196/22280.
8
Digital contact tracing technologies in epidemics: a rapid review.数字接触追踪技术在传染病疫情中的应用:快速综述。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 18;8(8):CD013699. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013699.
9
Systematic assessment of South Korea's capabilities to control COVID-19.韩国控制 COVID-19 能力的系统评估。
Health Policy. 2021 May;125(5):568-576. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.02.011. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
10
Understanding South Korea's Response to the COVID-19 Outbreak: A Real-Time Analysis.了解韩国应对 COVID-19 疫情的情况:实时分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 21;17(24):9571. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249571.

本文引用的文献

1
A Survey on Security and Privacy Issues in Contact Tracing Application of Covid-19.新冠疫情接触者追踪应用中的安全与隐私问题调查
SN Comput Sci. 2021;2(3):136. doi: 10.1007/s42979-021-00520-z. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
2
Technology, Privacy, and User Opinions of COVID-19 Mobile Apps for Contact Tracing: Systematic Search and Content Analysis.技术、隐私和用户对 COVID-19 移动接触追踪应用程序的看法:系统搜索和内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 9;23(2):e23467. doi: 10.2196/23467.
3
Information technology solutions, challenges, and suggestions for tackling the COVID-19 pandemic.应对新冠疫情的信息技术解决方案、挑战及建议。
Int J Inf Manage. 2021 Apr;57:102287. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102287. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
4
Evaluation of the Design and Implementation of a Peer-To-Peer COVID-19 Contact Tracing Mobile App (COCOA) in Japan.评估日本一款点对点 COVID-19 接触者追踪移动应用程序(COCOA)的设计与实现。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Dec 1;8(12):e22098. doi: 10.2196/22098.
5
COVID-19 Contact-Tracing Technology: Acceptability and Ethical Issues of Use.新冠病毒病接触者追踪技术:使用的可接受性与伦理问题
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020 Sep 18;14:1639-1647. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S276183. eCollection 2020.
6
Digital technologies in the public-health response to COVID-19.数字技术在应对 COVID-19 中的公共卫生响应。
Nat Med. 2020 Aug;26(8):1183-1192. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-1011-4. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
7
Ethical guidelines for COVID-19 tracing apps.新冠病毒追踪应用程序的伦理准则。
Nature. 2020 Jun;582(7810):29-31. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-01578-0.
8
Information Technology-Based Tracing Strategy in Response to COVID-19 in South Korea-Privacy Controversies.韩国应对新冠疫情的基于信息技术的追踪策略——隐私争议
JAMA. 2020 Jun 2;323(21):2129-2130. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.6602.

数字技术在 COVID-19 管理中的应用意义:日本和韩国的比较研究。

The Implications of Using Digital Technologies in the Management of COVID-19: Comparative Study of Japan and South Korea.

机构信息

Faculty of Social Sciences, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 6;25:e45705. doi: 10.2196/45705.

DOI:10.2196/45705
PMID:37279042
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10282901/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Technology can assist in providing effective infectious disease management, but it can also become a source of social injustice and inequality. To control the rapidly increasing SARS-CoV-2 infections and promote effective vaccine administration, both South Korea and Japan have been using several technology-based systems and mobile apps. However, their different approaches to technology use have yielded contrasting social implications.

OBJECTIVE

Through comparative studies of the use of digital technologies for pandemic management and its social implications in Japan and South Korea, this study aimed to discuss whether the active and optimal use of technology for pandemic management can occur without subverting or compromising important social values, such as privacy and equality.

METHODS

This study compared the social implications of Japan's and South Korea's contrasting approaches to technology implementation for COVID-19 pandemic management in early 2022.

RESULTS

Digital technologies have been actively and comprehensively used in South Korea, enabling effective COVID-19 management, but have raised serious concerns about privacy and social equality. In Japan, technologies have been more carefully implemented, thereby not causing similar social concerns, but their effectiveness in supporting COVID-19 regulations has been criticized.

CONCLUSIONS

Potential social implications such as equality concerns, the balance between public interest and individual rights, and legal implications must be carefully assessed in conjunction with effective and optimal infectious disease control to achieve sustainable use of digital health technologies for infectious disease management in the future.

摘要

背景

技术可以协助提供有效的传染病管理,但也可能成为社会不公和不平等的根源。为了控制 SARS-CoV-2 感染的迅速增加并促进有效的疫苗接种,韩国和日本都在使用几种基于技术的系统和移动应用程序。然而,它们对技术使用的不同方法产生了截然不同的社会影响。

目的

通过对日本和韩国在大流行管理中使用数字技术及其社会影响的比较研究,本研究旨在讨论在不颠覆或损害隐私和平等等重要社会价值观的情况下,是否可以积极、优化地利用技术进行大流行管理。

方法

本研究于 2022 年初比较了日本和韩国在新冠疫情管理中对技术实施的不同方法所产生的社会影响。

结果

韩国积极全面地利用数字技术有效地管理了 COVID-19,但引发了对隐私和社会平等的严重关切。在日本,技术的实施更为谨慎,因此没有引起类似的社会关注,但人们批评其在支持 COVID-19 法规方面的有效性。

结论

在未来,为了实现数字健康技术在传染病管理中的可持续利用,必须结合有效和优化的传染病控制,仔细评估潜在的社会影响,如平等问题、公共利益与个人权利之间的平衡以及法律影响。