• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

信任政府和社区意识在 COVID-19 接触者追踪隐私计算中的作用:使用两波调查和深入访谈的混合方法研究。

The Roles of Trust in Government and Sense of Community in the COVID-19 Contact Tracing Privacy Calculus: Mixed Method Study Using a 2-Wave Survey and In-Depth Interviews.

机构信息

Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.

Department of Health and Exercise Science, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Mar 7;12:e48986. doi: 10.2196/48986.

DOI:10.2196/48986
PMID:38451602
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10958335/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Contact tracing technology has been adopted in many countries to aid in identifying, evaluating, and handling individuals who have had contact with those infected with COVID-19. Singapore was among the countries that actively implemented the government-led contact tracing program known as TraceTogether. Despite the benefits the contact tracing program could provide to individuals and the community, privacy issues were a significant barrier to individuals' acceptance of the program.

OBJECTIVE

Building on the privacy calculus model, this study investigates how the perceptions of the 2 key groups (ie, government and community members) involved in the digital contact tracing factor into individuals' privacy calculus of digital contact tracing.

METHODS

Using a mixed method approach, we conducted (1) a 2-wave survey (n=674) and (2) in-depth interviews (n=12) with TraceTogether users in Singapore. Using structural equation modeling, this study investigated how trust in the government and the sense of community exhibited by individuals during the early stage of implementation (time 1) predicted privacy concerns, perceived benefits, and future use intentions, measured after the program was fully implemented (time 2). Expanding on the survey results, this study conducted one-on-one interviews to gain in-depth insights into the privacy considerations involved in digital contact tracing.

RESULTS

The results from the survey showed that trust in the government increased perceived benefits while decreasing privacy concerns regarding the use of TraceTogether. Furthermore, individuals who felt a connection to community members by participating in the program (ie, the sense of community) were more inclined to believe in its benefits. The sense of community also played a moderating role in the influence of government trust on perceived benefits. Follow-up in-depth interviews highlighted that having a sense of control over information and transparency in the government's data management were crucial factors in privacy considerations. The interviews also highlighted surveillance as the most prevalent aspect of privacy concerns regarding TraceTogether use. In addition, our findings revealed that trust in the government, particularly the perceived transparency of government actions, was most strongly associated with concerns regarding the secondary use of data.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a mixed method approach involving a 2-wave survey and in-depth interview data, we expanded our understanding of privacy decisions and the privacy calculus in the context of digital contact tracing. The opposite influences of privacy concerns and perceived benefit on use intention suggest that the privacy calculus in TraceTogether might be viewed as a rational process of weighing between privacy risks and use benefits to make an uptake decision. However, our study demonstrated that existing perceptions toward the provider and the government in the contact tracing context, as well as the perception of the community triggered by TraceTogether use, may bias user appraisals of privacy risks and the benefits of contact tracing.

摘要

背景

接触者追踪技术已在许多国家采用,以帮助识别、评估和处理与 COVID-19 感染者有过接触的个人。新加坡是积极实施政府主导的接触者追踪计划的国家之一,该计划名为 TraceTogether。尽管接触者追踪计划可以为个人和社区带来好处,但隐私问题是个人接受该计划的一个重大障碍。

目的

本研究以隐私计算模型为基础,探讨参与数字接触者追踪的 2 个关键群体(即政府和社区成员)的看法如何影响个人对数字接触者追踪的隐私计算。

方法

本研究采用混合方法,对新加坡的 TraceTogether 用户进行了(1)2 波调查(n=674)和(2)深入访谈(n=12)。本研究使用结构方程模型,调查了实施早期(第 1 时间点)个人对政府的信任和社区意识如何预测隐私担忧、感知益处和计划实施后的未来使用意向(第 2 时间点)。基于调查结果,本研究进行了一对一访谈,以深入了解数字接触追踪中涉及的隐私考虑因素。

结果

调查结果显示,对政府的信任增加了对使用 TraceTogether 的感知益处,同时降低了隐私担忧。此外,通过参与该计划与社区成员产生联系的个人(即社区意识)更倾向于相信其益处。社区意识在政府信任对感知益处的影响中也起到了调节作用。后续的深入访谈强调,对信息的控制感和政府数据管理的透明度是隐私考虑的关键因素。访谈还强调了 TraceTogether 使用中隐私关注的最普遍方面是监控。此外,我们的研究结果表明,对政府的信任,特别是对政府行动透明度的感知,与对数据二次使用的担忧密切相关。

结论

本研究采用 2 波调查和深入访谈数据的混合方法,扩展了我们对数字接触追踪背景下隐私决策和隐私计算的理解。隐私担忧和感知益处对使用意向的相反影响表明,TraceTogether 中的隐私计算可能被视为权衡隐私风险和使用益处以做出使用决策的理性过程。然而,我们的研究表明,在接触者追踪背景下,现有对提供者和政府的看法,以及 TraceTogether 使用引发的对社区的看法,可能会影响用户对隐私风险和接触者追踪益处的评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83c4/10958335/c7c77a2692b6/mhealth_v12i1e48986_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83c4/10958335/782c9197455f/mhealth_v12i1e48986_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83c4/10958335/0e840b4f137c/mhealth_v12i1e48986_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83c4/10958335/c7c77a2692b6/mhealth_v12i1e48986_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83c4/10958335/782c9197455f/mhealth_v12i1e48986_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83c4/10958335/0e840b4f137c/mhealth_v12i1e48986_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83c4/10958335/c7c77a2692b6/mhealth_v12i1e48986_fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
The Roles of Trust in Government and Sense of Community in the COVID-19 Contact Tracing Privacy Calculus: Mixed Method Study Using a 2-Wave Survey and In-Depth Interviews.信任政府和社区意识在 COVID-19 接触者追踪隐私计算中的作用:使用两波调查和深入访谈的混合方法研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Mar 7;12:e48986. doi: 10.2196/48986.
2
The Influence of Normative Perceptions on the Uptake of the COVID-19 TraceTogether Digital Contact Tracing System: Cross-sectional Study.规范性认知对 COVID-19 TraceTogether 数字接触者追踪系统采用的影响:横断面研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Nov 12;7(11):e30462. doi: 10.2196/30462.
3
Investigating Citizens' Acceptance of Contact Tracing Apps: Quantitative Study of the Role of Trust and Privacy.调查公民对接种追踪应用程序的接受程度:信任和隐私作用的定量研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Jan 18;12:e48700. doi: 10.2196/48700.
4
Individuals' privacy concerns and adoption of contact tracing mobile applications in a pandemic: A situational privacy calculus perspective.个人隐私顾虑与疫情期间接触者追踪移动应用的采用:情境隐私计算视角。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Mar 1;28(3):463-471. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa240.
5
Prosociality and the Uptake of COVID-19 Contact Tracing Apps: Survey Analysis of Intergenerational Differences in Japan.亲社会行为与 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序的采用:日本代际差异的调查分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Aug 19;9(8):e29923. doi: 10.2196/29923.
6
Early Perceptions of COVID-19 Contact Tracing Apps in German-Speaking Countries: Comparative Mixed Methods Study.德语国家对 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序的早期看法:比较混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 8;23(2):e25525. doi: 10.2196/25525.
7
Technology, Privacy, and User Opinions of COVID-19 Mobile Apps for Contact Tracing: Systematic Search and Content Analysis.技术、隐私和用户对 COVID-19 移动接触追踪应用程序的看法:系统搜索和内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 9;23(2):e23467. doi: 10.2196/23467.
8
Digital contact tracing technologies in epidemics: a rapid review.数字接触追踪技术在传染病疫情中的应用:快速综述。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 18;8(8):CD013699. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013699.
9
Understanding Trust and Changes in Use After a Year With the NHS COVID-19 Contact Tracing App in the United Kingdom: Longitudinal Mixed Methods Study.理解信任和在英国使用 NHS COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序一年后的变化:纵向混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Oct 14;24(10):e40558. doi: 10.2196/40558.
10
Use of a digital contact tracing system in Singapore to mitigate COVID-19 spread.新加坡使用数字接触者追踪系统来减轻 COVID-19 的传播。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Nov 16;23(1):2253. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17150-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Where horizontal and vertical surveillances meet: Sense-making of US COVID-19 contact-tracing apps during a health crisis.当横向监测与纵向监测相遇:美国新冠疫情接触者追踪应用程序在健康危机期间的意义建构
Mob Media Commun. 2022 Sep;10(3):468-486. doi: 10.1177/20501579221078674.
2
Use of a digital contact tracing system in Singapore to mitigate COVID-19 spread.新加坡使用数字接触者追踪系统来减轻 COVID-19 的传播。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Nov 16;23(1):2253. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17150-0.
3
Examining Theoretical Frameworks and Antecedents of Health Apps and Wearables Use: A Scoping Review.
审视健康类应用程序和可穿戴设备使用的理论框架和前因:范围综述。
Health Commun. 2024 Nov;39(12):2671-2681. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2023.2283655. Epub 2023 Nov 15.
4
What makes people install a COVID-19 contact-tracing app? Understanding the influence of app design and individual difference on contact-tracing app adoption intention.是什么促使人们安装新冠病毒接触者追踪应用程序?了解应用程序设计和个体差异对接触者追踪应用程序采用意愿的影响。
Pervasive Mob Comput. 2021 Aug;75:101439. doi: 10.1016/j.pmcj.2021.101439. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
5
Decoding China's COVID-19 Health Code Apps: The Legal Challenges.解读中国新冠健康码应用程序:法律挑战
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Aug 5;10(8):1479. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10081479.
6
The association of public trust with the utilization of digital contact tracing for COVID-19 in Japan.日本公众信任与新冠疫情数字接触追踪应用之间的关联。
Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2022 Dec;4:100279. doi: 10.1016/j.puhip.2022.100279. Epub 2022 Jun 11.
7
Infectious diseases prevention and control using an integrated health big data system in China.中国利用综合卫生大数据系统预防和控制传染病。
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Apr 6;22(1):344. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07316-3.
8
COVID-19 contact tracing apps: UK public perceptions.新冠病毒病接触者追踪应用程序:英国公众认知
Crit Public Health. 2022 Jan 1;32(1):31-43. doi: 10.1080/09581596.2021.1909707. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
9
Psychological factors shaping public responses to COVID-19 digital contact tracing technologies in Germany.塑造公众对德国 COVID-19 数字接触追踪技术反应的心理因素。
Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 21;11(1):18716. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-98249-5.
10
A survey of COVID-19 contact-tracing apps.新冠疫情接触者追踪应用程序调查报告。
Comput Biol Med. 2021 Oct;137:104787. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104787. Epub 2021 Aug 21.