Suppr超能文献

习得的特征差异被编码在目标模板中,并驱动视觉搜索。

Learned feature variance is encoded in the target template and drives visual search.

作者信息

Witkowski Phillip, Geng Joy J

机构信息

Center for Mind and Brain, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, 95616.

Department of Psychology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, 95616.

出版信息

Vis cogn. 2019;27(5-8):487-501. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2019.1645779. Epub 2019 Aug 1.

Abstract

Real world visual search targets are frequently imperfect perceptual matches to our internal target templates. For example, the same friend on different occasions is likely to wear different clothes, hairstyles, and accessories, but some of these may be more likely to vary than others. The ability to deal with template-to-target variability is important to visual search in natural environments, but we know relatively little about how feature variability is handled by the attentional system. In these studies, we test the hypothesis that top-down attentional biases are sensitive to the variance of target feature dimensions over time and prioritize information from less-variable dimensions. On each trial, subjects were shown a target cue composed of colored dots moving in a specific direction followed by a working memory probe (30%) or visual search display (70%). Critically, the target features in the visual search display differed from the cue, with one feature drawn from a distribution narrowly centered over the cued feature (low-variance dimension), and the other sampled from a broader distribution (high-variance dimension). The results demonstrate that subjects used knowledge of the likely cue-to-target variance to set template precision and bias attentional selection. Moreover, an individual's working memory precision for each feature predicted search performance. Our results suggest that observers are sensitive to the variance of feature dimensions within a target and use this information to weight mechanisms of attentional selection.

摘要

现实世界中的视觉搜索目标往往与我们内部的目标模板在感知上并不完美匹配。例如,同一个朋友在不同场合可能会穿着不同的衣服、发型和配饰,但其中一些可能比其他的更容易变化。应对模板与目标之间变异性的能力对于自然环境中的视觉搜索很重要,但我们对注意力系统如何处理特征变异性了解相对较少。在这些研究中,我们测试了这样一个假设:自上而下的注意力偏差对目标特征维度随时间的方差敏感,并优先处理来自变异性较小维度的信息。在每次试验中,向受试者展示一个由沿特定方向移动的彩色点组成的目标提示,随后是工作记忆探针(30%)或视觉搜索显示(70%)。关键的是,视觉搜索显示中的目标特征与提示不同,一个特征从以提示特征为中心的狭窄分布中抽取(低方差维度),另一个从更广泛的分布中采样(高方差维度)。结果表明,受试者利用提示到目标的可能方差的知识来设置模板精度并偏向注意力选择。此外,个体对每个特征的工作记忆精度预测了搜索性能。我们的结果表明,观察者对目标内特征维度的方差敏感,并利用这些信息来权衡注意力选择机制。

相似文献

1
Learned feature variance is encoded in the target template and drives visual search.
Vis cogn. 2019;27(5-8):487-501. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2019.1645779. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
2
Involuntary top-down control by search-irrelevant features: Visual working memory biases attention in an object-based manner.
Cognition. 2018 Mar;172:37-45. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.12.002. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
3
The Role of Color in Search Templates for Real-world Target Objects.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Nov;28(11):1714-1727. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00996. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
4
The precision of attentional selection is far worse than the precision of the underlying memory representation.
Cognition. 2019 May;186:20-31. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.02.001. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
5
Activation of new attentional templates for real-world objects in visual search.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2015 May;27(5):902-12. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00747. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
6
Visual Working Memory Load Disrupts Template-guided Attentional Selection during Visual Search.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 Dec;30(12):1902-1915. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01324. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
7
The Time Course of Target Template Activation Processes during Preparation for Visual Search.
J Neurosci. 2018 Oct 31;38(44):9527-9538. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0409-18.2018. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
8
The attentional template in high and low similarity search: Optimal tuning or tuning to relations?
Cognition. 2021 Jul;212:104732. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104732. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
9
Priming and the guidance by visual and categorical templates in visual search.
Front Psychol. 2014 Feb 24;5:148. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00148. eCollection 2014.
10
Object-based target templates guide attention during visual search.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Sep;44(9):1368-1382. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000541. Epub 2018 May 3.

引用本文的文献

1
The Inferior Frontal Junction Jointly Encodes Target Identity and Feature Uncertainty.
J Neurosci. 2025 Feb 5;45(6):e0459242024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0459-24.2024.
2
Attention to object categories: Selection history determines the breadth of attentional tuning during real-world object search.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2024 Jun;153(6):1568-1581. doi: 10.1037/xge0001575. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
3
Task-adaptive changes to the target template in response to distractor context: Separability versus similarity.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2024 Feb;153(2):564-572. doi: 10.1037/xge0001507. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
4
Prefrontal Cortex Codes Representations of Target Identity and Feature Uncertainty.
J Neurosci. 2023 Dec 13;43(50):8769-8776. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1117-23.2023.
5
Assessing satisfaction of search in virtual mammograms for experienced and novice searchers.
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2023 Feb;10(Suppl 1):S11917. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.10.S1.S11917. Epub 2023 Jul 21.
6
Expected distractor context biases the attentional template for target shapes.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2023 Sep;49(9):1236-1255. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001129. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
7
Learned feature regularities enable suppression of spatially overlapping stimuli.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Apr;85(3):769-784. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02612-1. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
8
Attentional priority is determined by predicted feature distributions.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2022 Nov;48(11):1201-1212. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001041. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
9
Temporal integration of feature probability distributions.
Psychol Res. 2022 Sep;86(6):2030-2044. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01621-3. Epub 2022 Jan 8.
10
Flexible weighting of target features based on distractor context.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Feb;82(2):739-751. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01910-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Do we remember templates better so that we can reject distractors better?
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Jan;82(1):269-279. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01721-8.
2
The allocation of resources in visual working memory and multiple attentional templates.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019 May;45(5):645-658. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000637. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
3
Template-to-distractor distinctiveness regulates visual search efficiency.
Curr Opin Psychol. 2019 Oct;29:119-125. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.01.003. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
5
Involuntary top-down control by search-irrelevant features: Visual working memory biases attention in an object-based manner.
Cognition. 2018 Mar;172:37-45. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.12.002. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
7
Representing Color Ensembles.
Psychol Sci. 2017 Oct;28(10):1510-1517. doi: 10.1177/0956797617713787. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
9
Looking sharp: Becoming a search template boosts precision and stability in visual working memory.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Aug;79(6):1643-1651. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1342-5.
10
Feature-based attentional weighting and spreading in visual working memory.
Sci Rep. 2017 Feb 24;7:42384. doi: 10.1038/srep42384.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验