Hospital Clinic Universitari de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2021 Jan;73(1):120-129. doi: 10.1002/acr.24467.
To analyze the use of the Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ) to screen for depression, as compared to 2 reference standards, the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale depression domain (HADS-D).
Patients from Barcelona with a primary diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or spondyloarthritis (SpA) completed the MDHAQ, the PHQ-9 (depression ≥10), and the HADS-D (depression ≥8) measures. The MDHAQ includes 2 depression items, 1 in the patient-friendly HAQ, scored in a 4-point format from 0 to 3.3, and a yes/no item on a 60-symptom checklist. Percentage agreement and kappa statistics quantified the agreement between 6 screening criteria: yes on the 60-symptom checklist, a score of ≥1.1, a score of ≥2.2 on a 4-point scale, and either a response of yes on the 60-symptom checklist or scores of ≥2.2, PHQ-9 ≥10, and HADS-D ≥8.
Depression screening was positive according to 6 criteria in 19.6-32.4% of 102 patients with RA, and 27.9-44.8% of 68 with SpA (total = 170). All MDHAQ scores, including depression items, were higher in patients with SpA compared to patients with RA, and within each diagnostic group in patients who met PHQ-9 ≥10 and HADS-D ≥8 depression screening criteria. The highest percentage agreement between an MDHAQ screening criterion versus PHQ-9 ≥10 was 83.3% for either an answer of yes on the 60-symptom checklist or a score of ≥2.2 on a 4-point scale, which we have termed MDHAQ-Dep. The agreement of MDHAQ-Dep versus HADS-D ≥8 was 81.7%, similar to the agreement of PHQ-9 ≥10 versus HADS-D ≥8, which was 82.2%. Kappa measures of agreement were 0.63 for MDHAQ-Dep versus PHQ-9 ≥10, 0.60 for MDHAQ-Dep versus HADS-D ≥8, and 0.62 for PHQ-9 ≥10 versus HADS-D ≥8.
A positive MDHAQ-Dep response (either an answer of yes on a 60-symptom checklist or a score of ≥2.2 on a 4-point scale) yielded similar results to PHQ-9 ≥10 or HADS-D ≥8 to screen for depression in these RA and SpA patients.
分析多维健康评估问卷(MDHAQ)用于筛查抑郁症的效果,与两个参考标准(患者健康问卷 9 项(PHQ-9)和医院焦虑和抑郁量表抑郁域(HADS-D))进行比较。
巴塞罗那的类风湿关节炎(RA)或脊柱关节炎(SpA)初诊患者完成 MDHAQ、PHQ-9(抑郁≥10)和 HADS-D(抑郁≥8)的评估。MDHAQ 包括 2 项抑郁项目,一项在患者友好型 HAQ 中,以 4 分制评分,从 0 到 3.3,另一项为 60 项症状清单上的是/否项目。百分比一致性和 Kappa 统计量量化了 6 种筛查标准之间的一致性:60 项症状清单上回答“是”、评分≥1.1、4 分制评分≥2.2,或 60 项症状清单上回答“是”或评分≥2.2、PHQ-9≥10 和 HADS-D≥8。
根据 6 项标准,102 例 RA 患者中有 19.6-32.4%、68 例 SpA 患者中有 27.9-44.8%(总计 170 例)的抑郁筛查呈阳性。与 RA 患者相比,所有 MDHAQ 评分(包括抑郁项目)在 SpA 患者中更高,在符合 PHQ-9≥10 和 HADS-D≥8 抑郁筛查标准的每个诊断组中也更高。MDHAQ 筛查标准与 PHQ-9≥10 之间的最高百分比一致性为 83.3%,要么是 60 项症状清单上回答“是”,要么是 4 分制评分≥2.2,我们称之为 MDHAQ-Dep。MDHAQ-Dep 与 HADS-D≥8 的一致性为 81.7%,与 PHQ-9≥10 与 HADS-D≥8 的一致性(82.2%)相似。MDHAQ-Dep 与 PHQ-9≥10、MDHAQ-Dep 与 HADS-D≥8、PHQ-9≥10 与 HADS-D≥8 的 Kappa 一致性分别为 0.63、0.60 和 0.62。
MDHAQ-Dep 阳性反应(60 项症状清单上回答“是”或 4 分制评分≥2.2)与 PHQ-9≥10 或 HADS-D≥8 一样,可用于筛查这些 RA 和 SpA 患者的抑郁症。