Suppr超能文献

多维健康评估问卷作为一种在常规风湿病学护理中筛查抑郁的有效工具。

Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire as an Effective Tool to Screen for Depression in Routine Rheumatology Care.

机构信息

Hospital Clinic Universitari de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Georgetown University, Washington, DC.

出版信息

Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2021 Jan;73(1):120-129. doi: 10.1002/acr.24467.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the use of the Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ) to screen for depression, as compared to 2 reference standards, the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale depression domain (HADS-D).

METHODS

Patients from Barcelona with a primary diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or spondyloarthritis (SpA) completed the MDHAQ, the PHQ-9 (depression ≥10), and the HADS-D (depression ≥8) measures. The MDHAQ includes 2 depression items, 1 in the patient-friendly HAQ, scored in a 4-point format from 0 to 3.3, and a yes/no item on a 60-symptom checklist. Percentage agreement and kappa statistics quantified the agreement between 6 screening criteria: yes on the 60-symptom checklist, a score of ≥1.1, a score of ≥2.2 on a 4-point scale, and either a response of yes on the 60-symptom checklist or scores of ≥2.2, PHQ-9 ≥10, and HADS-D ≥8.

RESULTS

Depression screening was positive according to 6 criteria in 19.6-32.4% of 102 patients with RA, and 27.9-44.8% of 68 with SpA (total = 170). All MDHAQ scores, including depression items, were higher in patients with SpA compared to patients with RA, and within each diagnostic group in patients who met PHQ-9 ≥10 and HADS-D ≥8 depression screening criteria. The highest percentage agreement between an MDHAQ screening criterion versus PHQ-9 ≥10 was 83.3% for either an answer of yes on the 60-symptom checklist or a score of ≥2.2 on a 4-point scale, which we have termed MDHAQ-Dep. The agreement of MDHAQ-Dep versus HADS-D ≥8 was 81.7%, similar to the agreement of PHQ-9 ≥10 versus HADS-D ≥8, which was 82.2%. Kappa measures of agreement were 0.63 for MDHAQ-Dep versus PHQ-9 ≥10, 0.60 for MDHAQ-Dep versus HADS-D ≥8, and 0.62 for PHQ-9 ≥10 versus HADS-D ≥8.

CONCLUSION

A positive MDHAQ-Dep response (either an answer of yes on a 60-symptom checklist or a score of ≥2.2 on a 4-point scale) yielded similar results to PHQ-9 ≥10 or HADS-D ≥8 to screen for depression in these RA and SpA patients.

摘要

目的

分析多维健康评估问卷(MDHAQ)用于筛查抑郁症的效果,与两个参考标准(患者健康问卷 9 项(PHQ-9)和医院焦虑和抑郁量表抑郁域(HADS-D))进行比较。

方法

巴塞罗那的类风湿关节炎(RA)或脊柱关节炎(SpA)初诊患者完成 MDHAQ、PHQ-9(抑郁≥10)和 HADS-D(抑郁≥8)的评估。MDHAQ 包括 2 项抑郁项目,一项在患者友好型 HAQ 中,以 4 分制评分,从 0 到 3.3,另一项为 60 项症状清单上的是/否项目。百分比一致性和 Kappa 统计量量化了 6 种筛查标准之间的一致性:60 项症状清单上回答“是”、评分≥1.1、4 分制评分≥2.2,或 60 项症状清单上回答“是”或评分≥2.2、PHQ-9≥10 和 HADS-D≥8。

结果

根据 6 项标准,102 例 RA 患者中有 19.6-32.4%、68 例 SpA 患者中有 27.9-44.8%(总计 170 例)的抑郁筛查呈阳性。与 RA 患者相比,所有 MDHAQ 评分(包括抑郁项目)在 SpA 患者中更高,在符合 PHQ-9≥10 和 HADS-D≥8 抑郁筛查标准的每个诊断组中也更高。MDHAQ 筛查标准与 PHQ-9≥10 之间的最高百分比一致性为 83.3%,要么是 60 项症状清单上回答“是”,要么是 4 分制评分≥2.2,我们称之为 MDHAQ-Dep。MDHAQ-Dep 与 HADS-D≥8 的一致性为 81.7%,与 PHQ-9≥10 与 HADS-D≥8 的一致性(82.2%)相似。MDHAQ-Dep 与 PHQ-9≥10、MDHAQ-Dep 与 HADS-D≥8、PHQ-9≥10 与 HADS-D≥8 的 Kappa 一致性分别为 0.63、0.60 和 0.62。

结论

MDHAQ-Dep 阳性反应(60 项症状清单上回答“是”或 4 分制评分≥2.2)与 PHQ-9≥10 或 HADS-D≥8 一样,可用于筛查这些 RA 和 SpA 患者的抑郁症。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验