Suppr超能文献

在当代风湿病护理中,RheuMetric医生对初次就诊与随访时炎症、损伤及患者痛苦程度的0至10级评估。

RheuMetric Physician 0 to 10 Estimates of Inflammation, Damage, and Patient Distress at Initial Versus Follow-Up Visits in Contemporary Rheumatology Care.

作者信息

Schmukler Juan, Li Tengfei, Block Joel A, Pincus Theodore

机构信息

Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.

出版信息

ACR Open Rheumatol. 2025 Mar;7(3):e70010. doi: 10.1002/acr2.70010.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to analyze the RheuMetric physician 0 to 10 visual numeric subscale (VNS) estimates of inflammatory activity (DOCINF), organ damage (DOCDAM), and patient distress (DOCDIS) at initial and follow-up routine rheumatology visits for possible incremental information to clarify physician estimate of global assessment (DOCGL).

METHODS

A retrospective cross-sectional study compared mean DOCGL, DOCINF, DOCDAM, and DOCDIS and the percentage contributed by inflammation, damage, and distress to DOCGL (total = 100%) at initial and follow-up visits in 563 unselected routine care patients, classified into four diagnosis categories: inflammatory (rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus [SLE], spondylarthritis, vasculitis, and gout), primary osteoarthritis (OA), primary fibromyalgia (FM), and "other" diagnoses. Differences between initial and follow-up visits were estimated using t-tests.

RESULTS

In all patients, mean DOCGL was 4.0/10, DOCINF 1.6/10, DOCDAM 2.9/10, and DOCDIS 2.4/10, indicating higher estimates for damage and distress than for inflammation, including in all inflammatory diagnoses other than SLE. Highest mean estimates were 2.2 for DOCINF in inflammatory diagnoses, 4.9 for DOCDAM in primary OA, 6.3 for DOCDIS in primary FM. However, DOCDAM was 2.8 (0.6 uniyts higher than DOCINF) in inflammatory diagnoses. RheuMetric estimates of inflammation were significantly higher at initial than at follow-up visits, and estimates of damage were significantly lower at initial than at follow-up visits in all patients and in those with inflammatory diagnoses. DOCGL did not differ significantly at initial versus follow-up visits.

CONCLUSION

DOCINF, DOCDAM, and DOCDIS add feasibly recorded, clinically relevant incremental information to DOCGL. Despite excellent contemporary control of inflammation, joint damage and patient distress remain important clinical problems in contemporary routine rheumatology care, documented by quantitative RheuMetric estimates.

摘要

目的

我们旨在分析在初次及随访的常规风湿病门诊中,RheuMetric医生对炎症活动度(DOCINF)、器官损害(DOCDAM)和患者痛苦程度(DOCDIS)的0至10视觉数字量表(VNS)评估,以获取可能的增量信息,从而阐明医生对整体评估(DOCGL)的估计。

方法

一项回顾性横断面研究比较了563例未经挑选的常规护理患者在初次及随访门诊时的平均DOCGL、DOCINF、DOCDAM和DOCDIS,以及炎症、损害和痛苦程度对DOCGL的贡献百分比(总计 = 100%)。这些患者被分为四个诊断类别:炎症性疾病(类风湿关节炎、系统性红斑狼疮[SLE]、脊柱关节炎、血管炎和痛风)、原发性骨关节炎(OA)、原发性纤维肌痛(FM)和“其他”诊断。使用t检验估计初次和随访门诊之间的差异。

结果

在所有患者中,平均DOCGL为4.0/10,DOCINF为1.6/10,DOCDAM为2.9/10,DOCDIS为2.4/10,表明对损害和痛苦程度的估计高于对炎症的估计,包括除SLE外的所有炎症性诊断。炎症性诊断中DOCINF的最高平均估计值为2.2,原发性OA中DOCDAM的最高平均估计值为4.9,原发性FM中DOCDIS的最高平均估计值为6.3。然而,在炎症性诊断中DOCDAM为2.8(比DOCINF高0.6个单位)。在所有患者以及患有炎症性诊断的患者中,RheuMetric对炎症的估计在初次门诊时显著高于随访门诊,而对损害的估计在初次门诊时显著低于随访门诊。DOCGL在初次和随访门诊之间无显著差异。

结论

DOCINF、DOCDAM和DOCDIS为DOCGL增添了可切实记录的、与临床相关的增量信息。尽管当前对炎症的控制良好,但关节损害和患者痛苦在当代常规风湿病护理中仍然是重要的临床问题,这通过定量的RheuMetric估计得以记录。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8152/11877136/ae98ea01f3f7/ACR2-7-e70010-g002.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验