• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

循证研究系列论文 2:在开展新研究之前使用循证研究方法,以确保研究的价值。

Evidence-Based Research Series-Paper 2 : Using an Evidence-Based Research approach before a new study is conducted to ensure value.

机构信息

Section for Evidence-based Practice, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway.

Department of Sport Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Herlev & Gentofte, Denmark.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jan;129:158-166. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.07.019. Epub 2020 Sep 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.07.019
PMID:32987159
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

There is considerable actual and potential waste in research. The aim of this article is to describe how using an evidence-based research approach before conducting a study helps to ensure that the new study truly adds value.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

Evidence-based research is the use of prior research in a systematic and transparent way to inform a new study so that it is answering questions that matter in a valid, efficient, and accessible manner. In this second article of the evidence-based research series, we describe how to apply an evidence-based research approach before starting a new study.

RESULTS

Before a new study is performed, researchers need to provide a solid justification for it using the available scientific knowledge as well as the perspectives of end users. The key method for both is to conduct a systematic review of earlier relevant studies.

CONCLUSION

Describing the ideal process illuminates the challenges and opportunities offered through the suggested evidence-based research approach. A systematic and transparent approach is needed to provide justification for and to optimally design a relevant and necessary new study.

摘要

背景与目的

研究中存在大量实际和潜在的浪费。本文的目的是描述在进行研究之前如何使用基于证据的研究方法,以确保新的研究真正具有价值。

研究设计与设置

基于证据的研究是指系统透明地利用先前的研究来为新的研究提供信息,以使其以有效、高效和可及的方式回答重要的问题。在证据基础研究系列的第二篇文章中,我们描述了在进行新研究之前如何应用基于证据的研究方法。

结果

在进行新的研究之前,研究人员需要使用现有科学知识以及最终用户的观点,为研究提供合理的依据。关键方法是对以前相关研究进行系统综述。

结论

描述理想的过程可以阐明通过建议的基于证据的研究方法提供的挑战和机遇。需要系统透明的方法来为相关和必要的新研究提供依据,并进行最佳设计。

相似文献

1
Evidence-Based Research Series-Paper 2 : Using an Evidence-Based Research approach before a new study is conducted to ensure value.循证研究系列论文 2:在开展新研究之前使用循证研究方法,以确保研究的价值。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jan;129:158-166. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.07.019. Epub 2020 Sep 26.
2
Evidence-Based Research Series-Paper 1: What Evidence-Based Research is and why is it important?循证研究系列论文 1:什么是循证研究及其重要性?
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jan;129:151-157. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.07.020. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
3
Evidence-Based Research Series-Paper 3: Using an Evidence-Based Research approach to place your results into context after the study is performed to ensure usefulness of the conclusion.循证研究系列论文 3:在完成研究后,采用循证研究方法将研究结果置于背景下,以确保结论的有用性。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jan;129:167-171. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.07.021. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
Key concepts in rapid reviews: an overview.快速综述的关键概念:概述。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2024 Nov;175:111518. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111518. Epub 2024 Sep 6.
7
Scientific evaluation of modern clinical research: we need a new currency!现代临床研究的科学评估:我们需要一种新的衡量标准!
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2011 Oct;396(7):937-9. doi: 10.1007/s00423-011-0842-3.
8
An overview of study designs.研究设计概述。
Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2020 May 2;81(5):1-6. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2020.0127. Epub 2020 May 4.
9
Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach.系统评价或范围综述?在选择系统评价或范围综述方法时,作者的指南。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 19;18(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x.
10
Qualitative Study定性研究

引用本文的文献

1
A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis of Biomedical Research Waste: Current Situation, Development, and Trends.生物医学研究废弃物的综合文献计量分析:现状、发展与趋势
Med Sci Monit. 2025 Jun 27;31:e948390. doi: 10.12659/MSM.948390.
2
The odds of developing asthma and wheeze among children and adolescents exposed to particulate matter: asystematic review and meta-analysis.暴露于颗粒物的儿童和青少年患哮喘及喘息的几率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Mar 31;25(1):1225. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22382-3.
3
Conception of a mobile health application targeting early postoperative physiotherapeutic care after total knee replacement, a qualitative study.
针对全膝关节置换术后早期物理治疗护理的移动健康应用程序构想:一项定性研究
Front Surg. 2025 Jan 27;11:1283202. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1283202. eCollection 2024.
4
Characterization changes and research waste in randomized controlled trials of global gastroesophageal reflux disease and hiatus hernia over the past 20 years.过去20年全球胃食管反流病和食管裂孔疝随机对照试验中的特征变化与研究浪费
Int J Surg. 2025 Mar 1;111(3):2358-2375. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002227.
5
Facilitators and barriers to AI adoption in nursing practice: a qualitative study of registered nurses' perspectives.护理实践中采用人工智能的促进因素和障碍:对注册护士观点的定性研究
BMC Nurs. 2024 Dec 18;23(1):891. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02571-y.
6
Tips from an expert panel on the development of a clinical research protocol.专家小组关于临床研究方案制定的建议。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Nov 29;24(1):293. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02315-1.
7
Cross-sectional exploratory survey among health researchers in Europe on the awareness of and barriers affecting the use of an evidence-based research approach.横断面探索性调查在欧洲的卫生研究人员对意识和障碍影响使用循证研究方法。
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 16;14(10):e083676. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083676.
8
Research inefficiencies in external validation studies of the Framingham Wilson coronary heart disease risk rule: A systematic review.弗雷明汉威尔逊冠心病风险规则外部验证研究中的研究效率低下:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 13;19(9):e0310321. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310321. eCollection 2024.
9
Needs led research: ensuring relevant research in two PhD projects within maternity care.需求导向型研究:确保两个产科护理博士项目中的相关研究
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Sep 12;10(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00627-6.
10
The use of systematic reviews for conducting new studies in physiotherapy research: a meta-research study comparing author guidelines of physiotherapy-related journals.系统评价在物理治疗研究中开展新研究的应用:一项比较与物理治疗相关期刊作者指南的元研究。
Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 13;13(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02427-7.