From the Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (WPD, DEN, KEK, DHF, DRdlC, LMD); Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque (RLR).
J Am Board Fam Med. 2020 Sep-Oct;33(5):675-686. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2020.05.190395.
To improve cardiovascular care through supporting primary care practices' adoption of evidence-based guidelines.
A cluster randomized trial compared two approaches: (1) standard practice support (practice facilitation, practice assessment with feedback, health information technology assistance, and collaborative learning sessions) and (2) standard support plus patient engagement support.
Primary outcomes were cardiovascular clinical quality measures (CQMs) collected at baseline, 9 months, and 15 months. Implementation of the first 6 "Building Blocks of High-Performing Primary Care" was assessed by practice facilitators at baseline and 3, 6, and 9 months. CQMs from practices not involved in the study served as an external comparison.
A total of 211 practices completed baseline surveys. There were no differences by study arm (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]) for aspirin use (1.03 [0.99, 1.06]), blood pressure (0.98 [0.95, 1.01]), cholesterol (0.96 [0.92, 1.00]), and smoking (1.01 [0.96, 1.07]); however, there were significant improvements over time in aspirin use (1.04 [1.01, 1.07]), cholesterol (1.05 [1.03, 1.08]), and smoking (1.03 [1.01, 1.06]), but not blood pressure (1.01 [0.998, 1.03]). Improvement in enrolled practices was greater than external comparison practices across all 4 measures (all < .05). Implementation improved in both arms for Team-Based Care, Patient-Team Partnership, and Population Management, and improvement was greater in enhanced intervention practices (all < .05). Leadership and Data-Driven Improvement ( < .05) improved significantly, with no difference by arm. A greater improvement in Building Block implementation was associated with a greater improvement in blood pressure measures ( < .05).
Practice transformation support can assist practices with improving quality of care. Patient engagement in practice transformation can further enhance practices' implementation of aspects of new models of care.
通过支持基层医疗实践采用基于证据的指南来改善心血管护理。
一项群组随机试验比较了两种方法:(1)标准实践支持(实践促进、带有反馈的实践评估、健康信息技术援助和协作学习会议)和(2)标准支持加患者参与支持。
主要结局是在基线、9 个月和 15 个月收集的心血管临床质量指标(CQM)。实践促进者在基线和 3、6 和 9 个月时评估前 6 个“高绩效初级保健的基础”的实施情况。未参与研究的实践的 CQM 用作外部比较。
共有 211 个实践完成了基线调查。研究组之间在阿司匹林使用(1.03[0.99,1.06])、血压(0.98[0.95,1.01])、胆固醇(0.96[0.92,1.00])和吸烟(1.01[0.96,1.07])方面没有差异(优势比[95%置信区间]);然而,阿司匹林使用(1.04[1.01,1.07])、胆固醇(1.05[1.03,1.08])和吸烟(1.03[1.01,1.06])方面的改善随时间推移显著,但血压(1.01[0.998,1.03])没有。所有四项措施(均<.05)中,纳入实践的改善均大于外部比较实践。在团队合作、医患伙伴关系和人群管理方面,两个组的实施都有所改善,强化干预实践的改善更为明显(均<.05)。领导能力和数据驱动改进(<.05)显著改善,与手臂无关。实施基础构建块的改进与血压测量的改善更大相关(<.05)。
实践转型支持可以帮助实践改善护理质量。患者参与实践转型可以进一步增强实践实施新护理模式的各个方面。