• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种社区参与式方法,用于设计心血管健康患者参与材料。

A Community Engagement Method to Design Patient Engagement Materials for Cardiovascular Health.

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado

Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.

出版信息

Ann Fam Med. 2018 Apr;16(Suppl 1):S58-S64. doi: 10.1370/afm.2173.

DOI:10.1370/afm.2173
PMID:29632227
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5891315/
Abstract

PURPOSE

EvidenceNOW Southwest is a cluster-randomized trial evaluating the differential impact on cardiovascular disease (CVD) care of engaging patients and communities in practice transformation in addition to standard practice facilitation support. The trial included development of locally tailored CVD patient engagement materials through Boot Camp Translation (BCT), a community engagement process that occurred before practice recruitment but after cluster randomization.

METHODS

We introduce a cluster randomization method performed before recruitment of small to medium-size primary care practices in Colorado and New Mexico, which allowed for balanced study arms while minimizing contamination. Engagement materials for the enhanced study arm were developed by means of BCT, which included community members, practice members, and public health professionals from (1) metropolitan Denver, (2) rural northeast Colorado, (3) Albuquerque, and (4) rural southeast New Mexico. Outcome measures were messages and materials from BCTs and population characteristics of study arms after using geographic-based covariate constrained randomization.

RESULTS

The 4 BCTs' messages and materials developed by the BCT groups uniquely reflected each community and ranged from family or spiritual values to early prevention or adding relevance to CVD risk. The geographic-based covariate of a cluster randomization method constrained randomization-assigned regions to study arms, allowing BCTs to precede practice recruitment, reduce contamination, and balance populations.

CONCLUSIONS

Cluster-randomized trials with community-based interventions present study design and implementation challenges. The BCTs elicited unique contextual messages and materials, suggesting that interventions designed to help primary care practices decrease CVD risk may not be one size fits all.

摘要

目的

EvidenceNOW 西南是一项集群随机试验,评估在为患者和社区提供实践转化的同时为标准实践提供促进支持,对心血管疾病(CVD)护理的影响差异。该试验包括通过 Boot Camp Translation(BCT)开发针对当地情况的 CVD 患者参与材料,这是一种在实践招募之前但在集群随机分组之后进行的社区参与过程。

方法

我们引入了一种在科罗拉多州和新墨西哥州的小型和中型初级保健实践招募之前进行的集群随机化方法,该方法允许平衡研究组,同时最大限度地减少污染。强化研究组的参与材料是通过 BCT 开发的,该方法包括来自(1)丹佛都会区、(2)科罗拉多州东北部农村、(3)阿尔伯克基和(4)新墨西哥州东南部农村的社区成员、实践成员和公共卫生专业人员。结局指标是 BCT 产生的信息和材料,以及使用基于地理的协变量约束随机化后研究组的人口特征。

结果

4 个 BCT 组开发的 BCT 信息和材料独特地反映了每个社区,范围从家庭或精神价值观到早期预防或增加 CVD 风险的相关性。基于地理的集群随机化方法的协变量限制了随机化分配区域到研究组,从而允许 BCT 在实践招募之前进行,减少污染并平衡人群。

结论

具有基于社区的干预措施的集群随机试验存在研究设计和实施挑战。BCT 引出了独特的背景信息和材料,表明旨在帮助初级保健实践降低 CVD 风险的干预措施可能并非一刀切。

相似文献

1
A Community Engagement Method to Design Patient Engagement Materials for Cardiovascular Health.一种社区参与式方法,用于设计心血管健康患者参与材料。
Ann Fam Med. 2018 Apr;16(Suppl 1):S58-S64. doi: 10.1370/afm.2173.
2
Does engagement matter? The impact of patient and community engagement on implementation of cardiovascular health materials in primary care settings.参与是否重要?患者和社区参与对初级保健环境中心血管健康材料实施的影响。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Apr 25;25(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02365-w.
3
Practice Transformation Support and Patient Engagement to Improve Cardiovascular Care: From EvidenceNOW Southwest (ENSW).实践转化支持和患者参与以改善心血管护理:来自 EvidenceNOW 西南(ENSW)。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2020 Sep-Oct;33(5):675-686. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2020.05.190395.
4
Primary Care Practices' Implementation of Patient-Team Partnership: Findings from EvidenceNOW Southwest.初级保健实践中患者团队合作的实施:来自 EvidenceNOW 西南的研究结果。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2019 Jul-Aug;32(4):490-504. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.04.180361.
5
Boot camp translation: a method for building a community of solution.集训营翻译:一种构建解决方案共同体的方法。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2013 May-Jun;26(3):254-63. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2013.03.120253.
6
Primary Care Practices' Ability to Report Electronic Clinical Quality Measures in the EvidenceNOW Southwest Initiative to Improve Heart Health.初级保健实践在 EvidenceNOW 西南倡议中报告电子临床质量指标以改善心脏健康的能力。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Aug 2;2(8):e198569. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.8569.
7
Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Trials Using Covariate Constrained Randomization: A Method for Practice-based Research Networks (PBRNs).使用协变量约束随机化的实用整群随机试验:一种基于实践的研究网络(PBRN)的方法。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2015 Sep-Oct;28(5):663-72. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.05.150001.
8
Advancing heart health in North Carolina primary care: the Heart Health NOW study protocol.改善北卡罗来纳州初级保健中的心脏健康:“现在就关注心脏健康”研究方案
Implement Sci. 2015 Nov 14;10:160. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0348-4.
9
A protocol paper: community engagement interventions for cardiovascular disease prevention in socially disadvantaged populations in the UK: an implementation research study.一份方案文件:英国社会弱势群体心血管疾病预防的社区参与干预措施:一项实施研究。
Glob Health Res Policy. 2020 Mar 12;5:12. doi: 10.1186/s41256-020-0131-1. eCollection 2020.
10
Making the Random the Usual: Appreciative Inquiry/Boot Camp Translation-Developing Community-Oriented Evidence That Matters.将随机变为常规:欣赏式探询/营地转化——开发以社区为导向的重要证据。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2020 Jan-Dec;11:2150132720904176. doi: 10.1177/2150132720904176.

引用本文的文献

1
Changing Our Mental and Emotional Trajectory (COMET): The Feasibility and Acceptability of a Rural Community-Based Strategy to Prevent Mental and Emotional Health Problems.改变我们的心理和情感轨迹(COMET):一种基于农村社区预防心理和情感健康问题策略的可行性与可接受性
J Prim Care Community Health. 2025 Jan-Dec;16:21501319251317337. doi: 10.1177/21501319251317337.
2
Does engagement matter? The impact of patient and community engagement on implementation of cardiovascular health materials in primary care settings.参与是否重要?患者和社区参与对初级保健环境中心血管健康材料实施的影响。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Apr 25;25(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02365-w.
3
Engaging with Rural Communities for Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach Using Modified Boot Camp Translation.利用改良的新兵训练营式翻译与农村社区合作开展结直肠癌筛查宣传活动。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2024;18(1):47-59.
4
Challenges and promising solutions to engaging patients in healthcare implementation in the United States: an environmental scan.参与美国医疗保健实施的患者面临的挑战和有前景的解决方案:环境扫描。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jan 4;24(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10315-y.
5
What Are the Best Practices for Co-Creating Patient-Facing Educational Materials? A Scoping Review of the Literature.共同创建面向患者的教育材料的最佳实践有哪些?文献综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Sep 23;11(19):2615. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11192615.
6
A Telehealth Diabetes Intervention for Rural Populations: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.一项针对农村人口的远程医疗糖尿病干预措施:随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Jun 14;11(6):e34255. doi: 10.2196/34255.
7
Informing a Randomized Control Trial in Rural Populations: Adaptation of a Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support Intervention.为农村人口开展随机对照试验:糖尿病自我管理教育与支持干预措施的调整
JMIR Diabetes. 2022 Jun 10;7(2):e35664. doi: 10.2196/35664.
8
Effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership on health services planning, delivery and evaluation.消费者和医疗服务提供者合作对卫生服务规划、提供和评估的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 15;9(9):CD013373. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013373.pub2.
9
Engaging practices and communities in the development of interventions to promote HPV vaccine uptake: a protocol for implementing Boot Camp Translation in the private practice setting.让实践机构和社区参与促进HPV疫苗接种的干预措施开发:在私人诊所环境中实施新兵训练营式翻译的方案
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 12;10(12):e041685. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041685.
10
Practice Transformation Support and Patient Engagement to Improve Cardiovascular Care: From EvidenceNOW Southwest (ENSW).实践转化支持和患者参与以改善心血管护理:来自 EvidenceNOW 西南(ENSW)。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2020 Sep-Oct;33(5):675-686. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2020.05.190395.

本文引用的文献

1
Engaging patients in primary care practice transformation: theory, evidence and practice.让患者参与基层医疗实践变革:理论、证据与实践
Fam Pract. 2017 Jun 1;34(3):262-267. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmw128.
2
Reinventing The Wheel Of Medical Evidence: How The Boot Camp Translation Process Is Making Gains.重塑医学证据之轮:新兵训练营式翻译流程如何取得进展。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Apr;35(4):613-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1648.
3
An evaluation of constrained randomization for the design and analysis of group-randomized trials.群组随机试验设计与分析中受限随机化的评估。
Stat Med. 2016 May 10;35(10):1565-79. doi: 10.1002/sim.6813. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
4
Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Trials Using Covariate Constrained Randomization: A Method for Practice-based Research Networks (PBRNs).使用协变量约束随机化的实用整群随机试验:一种基于实践的研究网络(PBRN)的方法。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2015 Sep-Oct;28(5):663-72. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.05.150001.
5
Involving patients in setting priorities for healthcare improvement: a cluster randomized trial.让患者参与医疗保健改进的优先级设定:一项集群随机试验。
Implement Sci. 2014 Feb 20;9:24. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-24.
6
Boot camp translation: a method for building a community of solution.集训营翻译:一种构建解决方案共同体的方法。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2013 May-Jun;26(3):254-63. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2013.03.120253.
7
Cold-spotting: linking primary care and public health to create communities of solution.冷点探测:将初级保健和公共卫生联系起来,创建解决方案社区。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2013 May-Jun;26(3):239-40. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2013.03.130094.
8
Patients with lower activation associated with higher costs; delivery systems should know their patients' 'scores'.与较低激活相关的患者具有较高的成本;交付系统应该了解患者的“分数”。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Feb;32(2):216-22. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1064.
9
Consort 2010 statement: extension to cluster randomised trials.《CONSORT 2010声明:群组随机试验扩展版》
BMJ. 2012 Sep 4;345:e5661. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e5661.
10
Customer quality and type 2 diabetes from the patients' perspective: a cross-sectional study.从患者角度看顾客质量与2型糖尿病:一项横断面研究。
J Res Health Sci. 2010 Dec 18;10(2):69-76.