Asakura Kenta, Gheorghe Ruxandra M, Borgen Stephanie, Sewell Karen, MacDonald Heather
Carleton University School of Social Work, Ottawa, Canada.
Carleton University MacOdrum Library, Ottawa, Canada.
Clin Soc Work J. 2021;49(2):231-243. doi: 10.1007/s10615-020-00772-x. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
This article reports a scoping review designed to synthesize current literature that used simulation as an investigative methodology (simulation-based research; SBR) in researching practice competencies in clinical social work. Following Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review framework, 24 articles were included in this scoping review. The majority of articles reported SBR studies conducted in Canada and the U.S. and were published in the last 10 years, signifying that this is a burgeoning area of research in clinical social work. Areas of clinical competencies included professional decision-making (33%), the role of cognition and emotion (21%), attending to culture and diversity (21%), and others, such as supervision skills (8%). Using qualitative (46%), quantitative (42%), and mixed methods (13%) in research design, more than half of the SBR studies reported in the selected articles used live actors (54%) to simulate a realistic practice situation for research. Selected articles also offered both benefits and limitations of SBR in social work. We offer suggestions for when to use SBR for research on clinical social work practice and strengthening a collaboration between clinicians and researchers in advancing practice-informed research.
本文报告了一项范围综述,旨在综合当前将模拟作为调查方法(基于模拟的研究;SBR)用于研究临床社会工作实践能力的文献。遵循阿克西和奥马利的范围综述框架,本范围综述纳入了24篇文章。大多数文章报告的是在加拿大和美国开展的基于模拟的研究,且发表于过去10年,这表明这是临床社会工作中一个新兴的研究领域。临床能力领域包括专业决策(33%)、认知和情感的作用(21%)、关注文化和多样性(21%)以及其他方面,如督导技能(8%)。在所选文章中报告的基于模拟的研究中,超过一半(54%)在研究设计中使用了真人演员来模拟现实的实践情境,采用定性(46%)、定量(42%)和混合方法(13%)。所选文章还阐述了基于模拟的研究在社会工作中的益处和局限性。我们针对何时将基于模拟的研究用于临床社会工作实践研究以及加强临床医生与研究人员在推进实践导向研究方面的合作提出了建议。