Suppr超能文献

以最佳诱导化疗方案序贯同步化疗加调强放疗作为局部晚期鼻咽癌的一线治疗方案。

Optimal induction chemotherapeutic regimen followed by concurrent chemotherapy plus intensity-modulated radiotherapy as first-line therapy for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

作者信息

Wang Fangzheng, Chuner Jiang, Lei Wang, Fengqin Yan, Zhimin Ye, Quanquan Sun, Tongxin Liu, Zhenfu Fu, Yangming Jiang

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Sep 25;99(39):e22283. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022283.

Abstract

For patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), induction chemotherapy (IC) regimens based on TPF (docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil), TP (docetaxel and cisplatin), and GP (gemcitabine and cisplatin) have shown excellent survival outcomes as the first-line therapy; however, no trials comparing the efficacy and safety of TPF, TP, and GP have been reported. We report 2 phase II trials comparing the treatment outcomes and side effects of 3 different IC regimens followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locoregionally advanced patients with NPC.A total of 206 locoregionally advanced patients with NPC treated with a combination treatment from January 2012 to January 2014 were enrolled in the 2 studies. The patients received TPF-, TP-, and GP-based IC regimens every 3 weeks, followed by intensity-modulated radiotherapy and concurrent therapy with cisplatin every 3 weeks.After a median follow-up duration of 47 months (10-60 months), the 3-year local recurrence-free survival, regional recurrence-free survival, distant metastases-free survival, progression-free survival, and overall survival rates were 96.4%, 100%, 87.7%, 86%, and 94.7% in the TPF arm; 91.7%, 95.9%, 91.9%, 85.2%, and 92% in the TP arm; 98.6%, 100%, 89.0%, 87.6%, and 89.2% in the GP arm. The survival differences among the 3 arms were not statistically significant (P > .05). The multivariate analysis demonstrated that the IC regimen was not an independent prognostic factor for any survival outcomes. The patients in the TP arm experienced significantly lower grade 3/4 toxicities than the patients in the other 2 arms.TP-based IC regimen has similar efficacy compared with TPF- and GP-based IC regimens; however, TP-based IC regimen has a lower toxicity profile.

摘要

对于局部区域晚期鼻咽癌(NPC)患者,基于TPF(多西他赛、顺铂和5-氟尿嘧啶)、TP(多西他赛和顺铂)和GP(吉西他滨和顺铂)的诱导化疗(IC)方案作为一线治疗已显示出优异的生存结果;然而,尚无比较TPF、TP和GP疗效及安全性的试验报道。我们报告了2项II期试验,比较3种不同IC方案序贯同步放化疗在局部区域晚期NPC患者中的治疗结果和副作用。

2012年1月至2014年1月期间接受联合治疗的206例局部区域晚期NPC患者纳入了这2项研究。患者每3周接受基于TPF、TP和GP的IC方案治疗,随后接受调强放疗并每3周同步使用顺铂治疗。

中位随访47个月(10 - 60个月)后,TPF组的3年局部无复发生存率、区域无复发生存率、远处转移无复发生存率、无进展生存率和总生存率分别为96.4%、100%、87.7%、86%和94.7%;TP组分别为91.7%、95.9%、91.9%、85.2%和92%;GP组分别为98.6%、100%、89.0%、87.6%和89.2%。三组之间的生存差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。多因素分析表明,IC方案不是任何生存结局的独立预后因素。TP组患者出现3/4级毒性的情况明显低于其他两组。

与基于TPF和GP的IC方案相比,基于TP的IC方案疗效相似;然而,基于TP的IC方案毒性较低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f35f/7523833/e02763d6eff3/medi-99-e22283-g004.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验