• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

小直径一体式陶瓷种植体在前牙区的初步研究:1 年随访的临床和美学效果。

A Pilot Study of Small-Diameter One-Piece Ceramic Implants Placed in Anterior Regions: Clinical and Esthetic Outcomes at 1-Year Follow-up.

出版信息

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020 Sep/Oct;35(5):965-973. doi: 10.11607/jomi.8308.

DOI:10.11607/jomi.8308
PMID:32991647
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical, esthetic, and patient-reported outcomes of one-piece zirconia implants placed in incisal areas using digital surgical templates after 1 year of follow-up.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who had lost an anterior tooth received a 3.3-mm-diameter zirconia implant placed by computer-guided surgery. Implant survival and soft tissue conditions were assessed periodically 1 week, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after loading. Standardized radiographs were taken at definitive prosthesis insertion and 1 year postloading to evaluate peri-implant bone loss. Additionally, the esthetic outcomes and patient-reported outcomes were also investigated.

RESULTS

Twenty zirconia implants were placed in 20 patients with no implants lost, resulting in 100% survival rates. A minor change in the mean marginal bone level (0.14 ± 0.87 mm) was found between definitive prosthetic loading and 12 months later. Peri-implant soft tissue remained stable throughout the observation period. The mean Pink Esthetic Score and White Esthetic Score were 12.05 and 8.60, respectively, while the mean Gingival Papilla Index scores were 1.55 at the mesial papilla and 1.65 at the distal papilla at the 1-year follow-up. The mean visual analog scale scores for patient perception of the overall process, speech, mastication, and esthetics were 93.3 ± 7.8, 95.1 ± 5.3, 93.6 ± 7.6, and 94.5 ± 6.2 mm, respectively.

CONCLUSION

For the 1-year results, 3.3-mm-diameter one-piece ceramic implants placed by computer-guided surgery showed favorable clinical performances with no failure when used for single-tooth replacement in anterior regions.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估经数字化手术模板引导在下颌切牙区植入一体式氧化锆种植体 1 年后的临床、美学和患者报告结果。

材料与方法

因前牙缺失的患者接受了计算机引导下的 3.3mm 直径氧化锆种植体植入。在负载后 1 周、3 个月、6 个月和 1 年定期评估种植体的存活率和软组织状况。在最终修复体插入和加载后 1 年时拍摄标准化 X 线片,以评估种植体周围骨丢失情况。此外,还调查了美学效果和患者报告的结果。

结果

20 名患者共植入 20 颗氧化锆种植体,无种植体脱落,存活率为 100%。从最终修复体加载到 12 个月后,平均边缘骨水平(0.14±0.87mm)有轻微变化。整个观察期内,种植体周围软组织保持稳定。在 1 年随访时,平均 Pink 美学评分和 White 美学评分分别为 12.05 和 8.60,而近中牙龈乳头指数和远中牙龈乳头指数分别为 1.55 和 1.65。患者对整个过程、言语、咀嚼和美学的感知的平均视觉模拟量表评分分别为 93.3±7.8、95.1±5.3、93.6±7.6 和 94.5±6.2mm。

结论

对于 1 年的结果,经计算机引导下的 3.3mm 直径一体式陶瓷种植体在前牙区单牙缺失的情况下表现出良好的临床性能,无种植体失败。

相似文献

1
A Pilot Study of Small-Diameter One-Piece Ceramic Implants Placed in Anterior Regions: Clinical and Esthetic Outcomes at 1-Year Follow-up.小直径一体式陶瓷种植体在前牙区的初步研究:1 年随访的临床和美学效果。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020 Sep/Oct;35(5):965-973. doi: 10.11607/jomi.8308.
2
Single tooth restoration in the maxillary esthetic zone using a one-piece ceramic implant with 1 year of follow-up: case series.上颌美学区单颗牙缺失的修复:采用一体式陶瓷种植体 1 年的临床研究。
Int J Implant Dent. 2021 Apr 6;7(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s40729-021-00308-z.
3
Esthetics and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Implants Placed with Guided Bone Regeneration and Complete Native Bone: A Prospective Controlled Clinical Trial.引导骨再生和完整原生骨植入的美学和患者报告结局:一项前瞻性对照临床试验。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020 Mar/Apr;35(2):406-414. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7751.
4
Outcome evaluation of early placed maxillary anterior single-tooth implants using objective esthetic criteria: a cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 patients with a 2- to 4-year follow-up using pink and white esthetic scores.使用客观美学标准对早期植入的上颌前牙单颗种植体进行疗效评估:一项横断面回顾性研究,对45例患者进行了2至4年的随访,并采用了粉红美学评分和白色美学评分。
J Periodontol. 2009 Jan;80(1):140-51. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.080435.
5
One-piece zirconia oral implants: one-year results from a prospective case series. 2. Three-unit fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) reconstruction.一体式氧化锆口腔种植体:一项前瞻性病例系列研究的一年结果。2. 三单位固定义齿(FDP)修复。
J Clin Periodontol. 2013 May;40(5):553-62. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12093. Epub 2013 Mar 18.
6
A Comparison of Esthetic Features of Pre-existing Natural Tooth Versus Post-Implant Restoration in the Esthetic Zone: A Retrospective 12-month Follow-up.美学区域中天然牙与种植修复后美学特征的比较:一项为期12个月的回顾性随访研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 Jul/Aug;33(4):919-928. doi: 10.11607/jomi.6465.
7
Esthetic outcome evaluation of maxillary anterior single-tooth bone-level implants with metal or ceramic abutments and ceramic crowns.采用金属或陶瓷基台及陶瓷牙冠的上颌前牙单颗骨水平种植体的美学效果评估。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014 Sep-Oct;29(5):1130-6. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3439.
8
Randomized controlled clinical pilot study of all-ceramic single-tooth implant reconstructions: clinical and microbiological outcomes at one year of loading.全瓷单颗牙种植修复的随机对照临床试验性研究:加载一年后的临床和微生物学结果
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Apr;28(4):406-413. doi: 10.1111/clr.12813. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
9
Tissue stability of implants placed in fresh extraction sockets: a 5-year prospective single-cohort study.植入新鲜拔牙窝内种植体的组织稳定性:一项为期5年的前瞻性单队列研究。
J Periodontol. 2014 Sep;85(9):e323-32. doi: 10.1902/jop.2014.140175. Epub 2014 May 16.
10
Single-piece zirconia versus single-piece titanium, narrow-diameter dental implants in the anterior maxilla: 5-year post-loading results of a randomized clinical trial.一体式氧化锆与一体式钛、窄径种植体在前上颌骨的应用:一项随机临床试验 5 年加载后的结果。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2024 Oct;35(10):1310-1323. doi: 10.1111/clr.14319. Epub 2024 Jun 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Accuracy of the surgical template used in the placement of implants and orthodontic miniscrews.用于种植体和正畸微螺钉植入的手术模板的准确性。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):999. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06328-0.
2
Patient-reported outcomes of zirconia dental implants: a systematic review and future directions.患者报告的氧化锆牙科种植体的结果:系统评价及未来方向。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2025 Jan 14;9(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s41687-025-00839-8.
3
Clinical outcomes of zirconia implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.氧化锆种植体的临床效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Dec 23;28(1):15. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05401-8.