Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Keskussairaalantie 4, P. O. Box 35 (L), FI-40014 Jyväskylä, Finland.
Faculty of Information Technology, University of Jyväskylä, Mattilanniemi 2, P.O. Box 35, FI-40014 Jyväskylä, Finland.
J Biomed Inform. 2020 Nov;111:103577. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103577. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is one of the most rapidly increasing non-communicable diseases worldwide. Lifestyle interventions are effective in preventing T2D but also resource intensive. This study evaluated with discrete event simulation (DES) the relative budget impacts of three hypothetical diabetes prevention programs (DPP), including group-based contact intervention, digital program with human coaching and fully automated program. The data for simulation were derived from research literature and national health and population statistics. The model was constructed using the iGrafx Process for Six Sigma software and simulations were carried out for 10 years. All simulated interventions produced cost savings compared to the situation without any intervention. However, this was a modeling study and future studies are needed to verify the results in real-life. Decision makers could benefit the predictive models regarding the long-term effects of diabetes prevention interventions, but more data is needed in particular on the usage, acceptability, effectiveness and costs of digital intervention tools.
2 型糖尿病(T2D)是全球增长最快的非传染性疾病之一。生活方式干预措施在预防 T2D 方面非常有效,但也需要大量资源。本研究通过离散事件模拟(DES)评估了三种假设的糖尿病预防计划(DPP)的相对预算影响,包括基于小组的接触干预、有人指导的数字计划和完全自动化的计划。模拟数据来自研究文献和国家卫生与人口统计数据。该模型使用 iGrafx Process for Six Sigma 软件构建,模拟时间为 10 年。与不进行任何干预的情况相比,所有模拟干预都节省了成本。然而,这是一项建模研究,需要进一步的研究来验证现实生活中的结果。决策者可以从预测模型中受益,了解糖尿病预防干预的长期效果,但特别需要更多关于数字干预工具的使用、可接受性、有效性和成本的数据。