Chalkley Anna E, Routen Ash C, Harris Jo P, Cale Lorraine A, Gorely Trish, Sherar Lauren B
School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE113TU, UK.
Diabetes Research Centre, Leicester General Hospital, University of Leicester, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK.
Children (Basel). 2020 Sep 25;7(10):151. doi: 10.3390/children7100151.
The adoption of school-based running programs has rapidly increased over the last five years in the UK and globally. However, there is currently a lack of information on how these initiatives are implemented, and whether they are generalizable and/or sustainable. This study evaluated the implementation (including reach, fidelity, and dose) of a school-based running program over seven months to inform future delivery. This observational study used a mixed-method, single-group, before-and-after design strengthened by multiple interim measurements to evaluate the implementation of an optional school-based running program. Five state-funded primary schools in Leicestershire, UK, participated, with 17 teachers and 189 (81 boys (47.4%) and 90 girls (52.6%)) Year 5 pupils (aged 9-10 years) from eight classes. During the 2016/2017 academic year, data were collected via several measures (including interviews, focus groups, observations, questionnaires, and teacher implementation logs) at multiple levels (i.e., school and individual) and at multiple time points during implementation. Follow up qualitative data were also collected during 2017/2018. The school-based running program achieved good reach, with 100% of pupils opting to participate at some point during the academic year. All schools implemented the program with good fidelity, although the level of implementation varied between schools and over time. The average number of sessions held per week ranged from 0.94-3.89 with the average distance accumulated per pupil per week ranging from 0.02 to 2.91 kilometers and boys being more likely than girls to be classed as high-level participators. Despite an initial drop off in participation over time, all schools remained engaged in the program and continued to implement it until the end of the school year. Contextual features (e.g., staff capacity and resources) differed between schools and influenced the quality of implementation and the frequency of delivery. The school-based running program is simple, inexpensive, and versatile and can be implemented by schools with relative ease. However, schools are diverse settings, with unique challenges to ongoing delivery. Thus, planned adaptations, specific to each school's context, are likely necessary to sustain participation in the longer term and should be considered prior to implementation.
在过去五年中,英国乃至全球范围内,以学校为基础的跑步项目的采用率迅速上升。然而,目前缺乏关于这些项目如何实施以及它们是否具有普遍性和/或可持续性的信息。本研究评估了一个以学校为基础的跑步项目在七个月内的实施情况(包括覆盖范围、保真度和剂量),以为未来的实施提供参考。这项观察性研究采用了混合方法、单组前后设计,并通过多次中期测量进行强化,以评估一个可选的以学校为基础的跑步项目的实施情况。英国莱斯特郡的五所公立小学参与了研究,有来自八个班级的17名教师和189名五年级学生(9至10岁)(81名男生(47.4%)和90名女生(52.6%))。在2016/2017学年期间,通过多种措施(包括访谈、焦点小组、观察、问卷调查和教师实施日志)在多个层面(即学校和个人)以及实施过程中的多个时间点收集数据。在2017/2018年期间也收集了后续定性数据。以学校为基础的跑步项目覆盖范围良好,100%的学生在学年中的某个时间点选择参与。所有学校都以较高的保真度实施了该项目,尽管实施水平在不同学校之间以及随时间有所变化。每周举行的课程平均数量在0.94至3.89之间,每个学生每周积累的平均距离在0.02至2.91公里之间,男生比女生更有可能被归类为高水平参与者。尽管随着时间的推移参与度最初有所下降,但所有学校都继续参与该项目并持续实施直至学年结束。学校之间的背景特征(如工作人员能力和资源)不同,这影响了实施质量和实施频率。以学校为基础的跑步项目简单、成本低且用途广泛,学校相对容易实施。然而,学校环境多样,持续实施面临独特挑战。因此,针对每个学校的具体情况进行有计划的调整,可能是长期维持参与度所必需的,并且在实施前应予以考虑。