Social Marketing @ Griffith, Department of Marketing, Griffith University, 170 Kessels Road, Nathan, QLD, 4111, Australia.
J Sch Health. 2022 Aug;92(8):739-764. doi: 10.1111/josh.13160. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
Health promotion programs and interventions are designed to encourage behavioral changes in children, encouraging them to make safe and healthy life choices. This systematic review seeks to examine how social impact is measured in primary school health promotion interventions.
A systematic search and review process was used to identify and examine primary school health promotion interventions. The PRISMA guidelines were followed to source articles from 6 electronic databases reporting school health promotion programs or interventions in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, or the United Kingdom.
A total of 77 studies were located, representing 55 health promotion interventions delivered in primary school settings. Of these interventions, only 8 (15%) measured or attempted to measure social impact, whereas another 8 (15%) alluded to social impact. The predominant theories reported were social based theories (theories which examine the social influences on people, environments, and behaviors) (n = 17, 59%), with almost a third not informed by an overt health promotion framework or model (n = 34, 59%). A systematic rating system identified some level of stakeholder engagement (n = 30, 53%).
This systematic review highlights the need for social impact measurement within health promotion to illuminate the role of school programs in delivering lasting change.
健康促进计划和干预措施旨在鼓励儿童改变行为,鼓励他们做出安全和健康的生活选择。本系统评价旨在探讨如何衡量小学健康促进干预措施的社会影响。
采用系统搜索和审查程序,从澳大利亚、加拿大、新西兰或英国的 6 个电子数据库中查找并审查小学健康促进计划或干预措施的文章。
共找到 77 项研究,代表了在小学环境中实施的 55 项健康促进干预措施。在这些干预措施中,只有 8 项(15%)测量或试图测量社会影响,而另外 8 项(15%)暗示了社会影响。报告的主要理论是基于社会的理论(检验人、环境和行为的社会影响的理论)(n=17,59%),近三分之一的理论没有明确的健康促进框架或模式(n=34,59%)。一个系统的评级系统确定了某种程度的利益相关者参与(n=30,53%)。
本系统评价强调了在健康促进中进行社会影响衡量的必要性,以阐明学校计划在提供持久变革方面的作用。