Department of Spine Surgery, Army Medical Center of PLA, No. 10 Changjiang Road, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400042, People's Republic of China.
Department of Orthopedics, Southwest Hospital of Army Medical University, PLA, No. 30 Gaotanyan Street, Shapingba District, Chongqing, 400038, People's Republic of China.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Sep 29;15(1):446. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01975-1.
Cannulated pedicle screw (CPS) augmented by polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) can achieve satisfactory clinical efficacy in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis with osteoporosis. However, accurate application of CPSs will help to avoid the difficulty of screw revision and reduce the incidence of PMMA-related complications. This study aimed to investigate the mid-term efficacy of CPS compared to unilateral and bilateral applications in this common lumbar degenerative disease.
May 2011 and May 2018, 50 patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis with osteoporosis who underwent posterior fixation and fusion using traditional pedicle screws or CPSs were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups based on the application: the unilateral PMMA-augmented CPS group (UC, n = 29) and the bilateral PMMA-augmented CPS group (BC, n = 21). Operation time, blood loss, average hospitalization time, PMMA leakage, and other complications were recorded. The visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores were used to evaluate symptom recovery. Radiographic results were compared for intervertebral fusion and screw loosening.
There were no significant differences in the baseline data of the two groups. The VAS and ODI scores improved significantly after surgery (P < 0.05), with no significant differences between the groups (P > 0.05). The operation time and blood loss in the UC group were significantly lower than those in the BC group (P < 0.05). However, the loss of intervertebral disk height and Taillard index did not differ significantly between the groups. The rates of PMMA leakage in the UC and BC groups were 7.0% and 11.9%, respectively (P < 0.05). Bony fusion was achieved in all groups without screw loosening at the last follow-up. Only one patient experienced superficial infection in both groups, while cerebrospinal fluid leakage was observed in two patients in the BC group.
Unilateral application of PMMA-augmented CPS may provide adequate clinical safety and effectiveness in the surgical treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis with osteoporosis.
在骨质疏松性腰椎滑脱症的治疗中,聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)增强的空心椎弓根螺钉(CPS)可获得满意的临床疗效。然而,准确应用 CPS 有助于避免螺钉修正的困难,并降低 PMMA 相关并发症的发生率。本研究旨在探讨 CPS 在这种常见的腰椎退行性疾病中的单侧和双侧应用的中期疗效。
2011 年 5 月至 2018 年 5 月,共纳入 50 例骨质疏松性腰椎滑脱症患者,均采用后路固定融合术,其中 29 例采用单侧 PMMA 增强 CPS(UC 组),21 例采用双侧 PMMA 增强 CPS(BC 组)。记录手术时间、出血量、平均住院时间、PMMA 渗漏等并发症,采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)和 Oswestry 功能障碍指数(ODI)评分评估症状恢复情况,比较影像学结果的椎间融合和螺钉松动情况。
两组患者的基线资料无统计学差异。术后 VAS 和 ODI 评分均明显改善(P<0.05),但两组间无统计学差异(P>0.05)。UC 组手术时间和出血量明显低于 BC 组(P<0.05),但两组间椎间隙高度丢失和 Taillard 指数无明显差异。UC 组和 BC 组的 PMMA 渗漏发生率分别为 7.0%和 11.9%(P<0.05)。所有患者末次随访时均获得骨性融合,无螺钉松动。两组各有 1 例患者发生浅表感染,BC 组有 2 例患者发生脑脊液漏。
单侧应用 PMMA 增强 CPS 治疗骨质疏松性腰椎滑脱症可获得足够的临床安全性和疗效。