Longgang Orthopedics Hospital of Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518100, China.
The 1St Institute of Clinical Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, 12 Airport Road, Baiyun District, Guangzhou, 510405, Guangdong, China.
Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 16;13(1):827. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-27539-x.
The present study examined the necessity of cement-augmented pedicle screw fixation in osteoporotic patients with single-segment isthmic spondylolisthesis.Fifty-nine cases were reviewed retrospectively. Thirty-three cases were in the polymethylmethacrylate-augmented pedicle screw (PMMA-PS) group, and the other 26 cases were in the conventional pedicle screw (CPS) group. Evaluation data included operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospitalization cost, hospitalization days, rates of fusion, screw loosening, bone cement leakage, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, Oswestry disability index (ODI), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic tilt (PT) and sacral slope (SS).The operation time and blood loss in the CPS group decreased significantly compared to those in the PMMA-PS group. The average hospitalization cost of the PMMA-PS group was significantly higher than that of the CPS group. There was no significant difference in the average hospital stay between the 2 groups. The initial and last follow-up postoperative VAS and ODI scores improved significantly in the two groups. There were no significant differences in VAS and ODI between the 2 groups at each time point. The last postoperative spine-pelvic parameters were significantly improved compared with those preoperatively. In the PMMA-PS group, the fusion rate was 100%. The fusion rate was 96.15% in the CPS group. No significant difference was found between the two groups for the fusion rate. Nine patients in the PMMA-PS group had bone cement leakage. There was no screw loosening in the PMMA-PS group. There were 2 cases of screw loosening in the CPS group. There were no significant differences in screw loosening, postoperative adjacent segment fractures, postoperative infection or postoperative revision between the 2 groups. The use of PMMA-PS on a regular basis is not recommended in posterior lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of single-segment isthmic spondylolisthesis with osteoporosis.
本研究旨在探讨在骨质疏松性单节段峡部裂性脊椎滑脱患者中,经皮椎弓根螺钉固定时骨水泥强化的必要性。回顾性分析 59 例患者的临床资料,其中采用聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯强化椎弓根螺钉(PMMA-PS)固定 33 例(PMMA-PS 组),采用常规椎弓根螺钉(CPS)固定 26 例(CPS 组)。评估指标包括手术时间、术中出血量、住院费用、住院天数、融合率、螺钉松动、骨水泥渗漏、视觉模拟评分(VAS)、Oswestry 功能障碍指数(ODI)、腰椎前凸角(LL)、骨盆倾斜角(PT)和骶骨倾斜角(SS)。CPS 组的手术时间和术中出血量明显低于 PMMA-PS 组。PMMA-PS 组的平均住院费用明显高于 CPS 组。两组的平均住院天数无统计学差异。两组术后即刻及末次随访时 VAS 和 ODI 评分均较术前明显改善,两组各时间点 VAS 和 ODI 评分比较差异均无统计学意义。末次随访时脊柱骨盆参数均较术前明显改善。PMMA-PS 组融合率为 100%,CPS 组融合率为 96.15%,两组融合率比较差异无统计学意义。PMMA-PS 组 9 例发生骨水泥渗漏,CPS 组无螺钉松动,两组螺钉松动率比较差异无统计学意义。PMMA-PS 组 2 例发生邻近节段骨折,CPS 组无术后感染和术后翻修,两组比较差异均无统计学意义。对于骨质疏松性单节段峡部裂性脊椎滑脱,不建议常规行 PMMA-PS 强化椎弓根螺钉固定。