Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Women's Health, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA.
Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Women's Health, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA; Albert Einstein Cancer Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA.
Curr Probl Cancer. 2021 Apr;45(2):100655. doi: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2020.100655. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
The use of opioids across all specialties has increased greatly over the last 2 decades and along with it, opioid misuse, overdose and death. The contribution of opioids prescribed for gynecologic cancers to this problem is unknown. Data from other surgical specialties show prescriber factors including gender, geographic location, board certification, experience, and fellowship training influence opioid prescribing. To characterize national-level opioid prescription patterns among gynecologic oncologists treating Medicare beneficiaries. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services database was used to access Medicare Part D opioid claims prescribed by gynecologic oncologists in 2016. Prescription and prescriber characteristics were recorded including medication type, prescription length, number of claims, and total day supply. Region of practice was determined according to the US Census Bureau Regions. Board certification data were obtained from American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology website. Bivariate statistical analysis and linear regression modeling were performed using Stata version 14.2. In 2016, 494 board-certified US gynecologic oncologists wrote 24,716 opioid prescriptions for a total 267,824 days of treatment (median 8 [interquartile range {IQR} 6, 11] prescribed days per claim). Gynecologic oncologists had a median of 33 opioid claims (IQR 18, 64). Male physicians had significantly more opioid prescription claims than females (P < 0.01) including after adjustment for differences in years of experience. There was no difference in prescribed days per claim between male and female physicians. Physicians in the South had the greatest number of opioid prescription claims and significantly more than physicians in all other regions (P < 0.01). Gynecologic oncologists who were board certified for >15 years had a greater number of median opioid claims (28 IQR 16, 50) than those with <5 years since board certification (22 IQR 15, 38) (P= 0.04). Physicians who were board certified in palliative care (n = 19) had significantly more opioids claims (median 40; IQR 18, 91) than those without (median 32; IQR 18, 64) (P< 0.01). In 2016, there were gender-based, regional, and experience-related variations in opioid prescribing by providers caring for Medicare-insured patients.
在过去的 20 年里,所有专业的阿片类药物使用量都大大增加了,随之而来的是阿片类药物滥用、过量用药和死亡。妇科癌症患者开具的阿片类药物在这一问题中所起的作用尚不清楚。来自其他外科专业的数据表明,包括性别、地理位置、委员会认证、经验和奖学金培训在内的开方医生因素会影响阿片类药物的开具。本研究旨在描述治疗医疗保险受益人的妇科肿瘤医生开具阿片类药物的全国水平。利用医疗保险和医疗补助服务数据库获取了 2016 年妇科肿瘤医生开具的医疗保险处方阿片类药物数据。记录了处方和开方医生的特征,包括药物类型、处方长度、开方数量和总日供应量。根据美国人口普查局的区域确定了执业区域。委员会认证数据从美国妇产科委员会网站获得。使用 Stata 版本 14.2 进行了双变量统计分析和线性回归建模。2016 年,494 名经过委员会认证的美国妇科肿瘤医生为 24716 名患者开出了阿片类药物处方,共治疗 267824 天(中位数 8 [IQR 6, 11] 天/张)。妇科肿瘤医生的阿片类药物处方中位数为 33 张(IQR 18, 64)。男性医生开出的阿片类药物处方明显多于女性医生(P < 0.01),包括调整了工作年限的差异后也是如此。男性和女性医生的每张处方规定的天数没有差异。南部地区的医生开出的阿片类药物处方数量最多,明显多于其他所有地区的医生(P < 0.01)。拥有>15 年认证经验的妇科肿瘤医生开出的阿片类药物处方数量中位数(28 [IQR 16, 50])多于认证时间<5 年的医生(22 [IQR 15, 38])(P=0.04)。从事姑息治疗委员会认证(n = 19)的医生开出的阿片类药物处方数量明显更多(中位数 40;IQR 18, 91),而没有从事姑息治疗委员会认证的医生开出的阿片类药物处方数量中位数(32;IQR 18, 64)(P< 0.01)。2016 年,在为医疗保险参保患者提供护理的提供者中,存在性别、地区和经验相关的阿片类药物处方差异。