Svider Peter F, Arianpour Khashayar, Guo Eric, Folbe Elana, Zuliani Giancarlo, Lin Hosheng, Eloy Jean Anderson, Folbe Adam J
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan.
Department of Otolaryngology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan.
Laryngoscope. 2018 Jul;128(7):1576-1581. doi: 10.1002/lary.27101. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: There has been growing recognition of the roles prescription drug misuse and diversion play in facilitating the ongoing opioid epidemic. Our objective was to evaluate opioid prescription patterns among practicing otolaryngologists.
Retrospective review of a CMS database.
Medicare Part D beneficiary data (2015) were accessed for a list of otolaryngologists. Opioid prescription rates, amount, and supply were calculated. Factors including board certification, experience, gender, and location were obtained for the 9,068 unique otolaryngologists represented in this dataset.
In 2015, otolaryngologists wrote 133,779 opioid prescriptions for 922,806 days (6.9 days/per prescription). The majority was for hydrocodone-acetaminophen (64.0%). Most otolaryngologists (51.2%) prescribed ≤ 10 opioids; 6.1% offered > 50 opioid prescriptions. Men wrote more prescriptions on average. Opioid prescription rates were greatest in the Midwest (4.6%) and least in the Northeast (1.8%), and the highest/lowest rates were in Delaware (8.6%) and New York (1.3%). Midcareer (11 -20 years) otolaryngologists were most likely to write >50 prescriptions. The opioid prescription rate declined with greater experience.
Opioid prescriptions written by otolaryngologists may play a significant role in the availability of these agents, as otolaryngologists wrote nearly 1 million days worth of opioids to Medicare beneficiaries in 2015. Although the majority of otolaryngologists write fewer than 11 prescriptions annually, those writing more prescriptions also write lengthier courses. There is significant geographic variation in prescribing patterns, highlighting a lack of consensus, and midcareer otolaryngologists are more aggressive in offering opioids. These findings highlight an urgent need for strengthening educational resources aimed at minimizing unnecessary prescriptions.
NA. Laryngoscope, 128:1576-1581, 2018.
目的/假设:人们越来越认识到处方药滥用和转移在助长当前阿片类药物流行中所起的作用。我们的目的是评估执业耳鼻喉科医生的阿片类药物处方模式。
对医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)数据库进行回顾性分析。
获取2015年医疗保险D部分受益人的数据,以列出耳鼻喉科医生名单。计算阿片类药物的处方率、处方量和供应量。从该数据集中9068名不同的耳鼻喉科医生中获取包括委员会认证、经验、性别和地理位置等因素。
2015年,耳鼻喉科医生开出了133779张阿片类药物处方,共计922806天(每张处方6.9天)。大多数处方为氢可酮-对乙酰氨基酚(64.0%)。大多数耳鼻喉科医生(51.2%)开出的阿片类药物处方≤10张;6.1%的医生开出的阿片类药物处方>50张。男性平均开出的处方更多。阿片类药物处方率在中西部地区最高(4.6%),在东北地区最低(1.8%),最高/最低处方率分别出现在特拉华州(8.6%)和纽约州(1.3%)。职业生涯中期(11 - 20年)的耳鼻喉科医生最有可能开出>50张处方。阿片类药物处方率随着经验的增加而下降。
耳鼻喉科医生开出的阿片类药物处方可能在这些药物的供应中起重要作用,因为2015年耳鼻喉科医生为医疗保险受益人开出了近100万天用量的阿片类药物。虽然大多数耳鼻喉科医生每年开出的处方少于11张,但那些开出较多处方的医生开出的疗程也更长。处方模式存在显著的地域差异,这突出表明缺乏共识,并且职业生涯中期的耳鼻喉科医生在开具阿片类药物方面更为激进。这些发现凸显了迫切需要加强教育资源,以尽量减少不必要的处方。
无。《喉镜》,2018年,第128卷,第1576 - 1581页。