College of Pharmacy, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
College of Pharmacy-Department of Pharmacy Practice, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 29;10(9):e036138. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036138.
Creating an appropriate antithrombotic therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains a dilemma. Several clinical trials compared the use of a dual antithrombotic therapy (DAT) regimen with a direct oral anticoagulants including (apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban or rivaroxaban) and a P2Y inhibitor versus a triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT) that includes a vitamin K antagonist plus aspirin and a P2Y inhibitor in patients with AF who have undergone PCI. However, there are no head-to-head trials comparing the DAT regimens to each other. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of DAT regimens using a network meta-analysis (NMA) approach.
A systematic review and NMA of randomised clinical trials.
We conducted a systematic literature review to identify relevant randomised clinical trials and performed a Bayesian NMA for International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) major or clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding, all-cause mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction (MI) and stent thrombosis outcomes. We used NetMetaXL V.1.6.1 and WinBUGS V.1.4.3 for the NMA and estimated the probability of ranking the treatments based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve.
The comparison between DAT regimens showed no significant difference in the safety or efficacy outcomes. Apixaban regimen was ranked first as the preferred therapy in terms of ISTH major or CRNM bleeding and stroke, with a probability of 52% and 54%, respectively. Rivaroxaban regimen was the preferred therapy in terms of MI and stent thrombosis, with a probability of 34% and 27%, respectively. Dabigatran regimen was ranked first in terms of all-cause mortality, with a probability of 28%.
The DAT regimens are as safe and effective as TAT regimens. However, ranking probabilities for the best option in the selected outcomes can be used to guide the selection among these agents based on different patients' conditions.
为接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的心房颤动(AF)患者制定合适的抗栓治疗方案仍然是一个难题。几项临床试验比较了双联抗栓治疗(DAT)方案与包括(阿哌沙班、达比加群、依度沙班或利伐沙班)和 P2Y 抑制剂的直接口服抗凝剂与包括维生素 K 拮抗剂加阿司匹林和 P2Y 抑制剂的三联抗栓治疗(TAT)在接受 PCI 的 AF 患者中的疗效。然而,没有头对头试验比较 DAT 方案之间的疗效。我们旨在使用网络荟萃分析(NMA)方法比较 DAT 方案的疗效和安全性。
随机临床试验的系统评价和 NMA。
我们进行了系统文献综述,以确定相关的随机临床试验,并对国际血栓和止血学会(ISTH)主要或临床相关非主要(CRNM)出血、全因死亡率、卒中和心肌梗死(MI)和支架血栓形成结局进行了贝叶斯 NMA。我们使用 NetMetaXL V.1.6.1 和 WinBUGS V.1.4.3 进行 NMA,并根据累积排序曲线下面积估计基于治疗排序概率的排名。
DAT 方案之间的比较在安全性或疗效结局方面没有差异。阿哌沙班方案在 ISTH 主要或 CRNM 出血和卒中等方面被评为首选治疗方案,概率分别为 52%和 54%。利伐沙班方案在 MI 和支架血栓形成方面被评为首选治疗方案,概率分别为 34%和 27%。达比加群方案在全因死亡率方面排名第一,概率为 28%。
DAT 方案与 TAT 方案一样安全有效。然而,基于不同患者的情况,可使用所选结局中最佳方案的排序概率来指导这些药物的选择。