• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

垂直预备的牙支持式固定义齿中传统印模与数字印模准确性的比较分析

Comparative analysis of trueness between conventional and digital impression in dental-supported fixed dental prosthesis with vertical preparation.

作者信息

García-Gil Ignacio, Perez de la Calle Celia, Lopez-Suarez Carlos, Pontevedra Paula, Suarez Maria J

机构信息

DDS, MS. Student, Master Program Buccofacial Prostheses and Occlusion, Faculty of Dentistry, University Complutense of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

DDS. Student, Master Program Buccofacial Prostheses and Occlusion, Faculty of Dentistry, University Complutense of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

J Clin Exp Dent. 2020 Sep 1;12(9):e896-e901. doi: 10.4317/jced.56967. eCollection 2020 Sep.

DOI:10.4317/jced.56967
PMID:32994882
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7511056/
Abstract

Biologically oriented preparation technique (BOPT) is a vertical preparation technique without a finish line to create a new anatomic crown with a prosthetic emergence profile. This case report describe the protocol realized digitally in a patient who required a new fixed partial denture (FPD) in the anterior esthetic zone. After time of temporary restoration, definitive conventional (CI) (double-cord retraction and vinyl polysiloxane material), and digital impression (DI) with three different intraoral scanner (IOS) (Trios®, True Definition® and iTero®) were taken. All digital impression were obtained through three different scans: temporary restoration in the mouth after healing period, prepared teeth, and temporary restoration out of the mouth. To establish which of the IOS was the most accurate, it was necessary to compare the STL files obtained from each of the IOS with the STL file of the conventional impression, which was digitized with a laboratory scanner (3Shape D800). All these STL were imported to a software (ExoCAD 2.4 Plovdiv®), and they were superimposed. To establish the difference in trueness with SC, 6 points were chosen, 3 points in teeth, and another 3 points in soft tissue. The mean measurement in terms of trueness in teeth were: STS (0,039 mm), SI (0,054 mm), STD (0,067 mm); and in soft tissue were: STS (0,051 mm), SI (0,09 mm), STD [0,236 mm]. The IOSs showed differences between them in terms of trueness, being the Trios the most accuracy IOS. Final restoration was fabricated and cemented. The patient was examined at 3, 6 and 12 months, without any type of biological or mechanical complications. Digital impression with an IOS seems to be a viable alternative to perform zirconia FPD in the BOPT tecbique. Intraoral scanners, accuracy, vertical preparation, precision, CAD-CAM, prosthodontics.

摘要

生物导向性预备技术(BOPT)是一种无肩台的垂直预备技术,用于创建具有修复体边缘形态的新解剖牙冠。本病例报告描述了在一名需要在前牙美学区制作新的固定局部义齿(FPD)的患者中以数字方式实现的方案。在临时修复一段时间后,采用了传统印模法(CI)(双绳缩龈和乙烯基聚硅氧烷材料)以及使用三种不同口腔内扫描仪(IOS)(Trios®、True Definition®和iTero®)进行数字印模(DI)。所有数字印模均通过三种不同扫描获得:愈合期后口腔内的临时修复体、预备牙以及口腔外的临时修复体。为确定哪种IOS最准确,有必要将从每个IOS获得的STL文件与用实验室扫描仪(3Shape D800)数字化的传统印模的STL文件进行比较。所有这些STL文件都导入到一个软件(ExoCAD 2.4 Plovdiv®)中,并进行叠加。为确定与传统印模在准确性上的差异,选择了6个点,牙齿上3个点,软组织上另外3个点。牙齿准确性方面的平均测量值为:Trios(0.039毫米)、True Definition(0.054毫米)、iTero(0.067毫米);软组织方面的平均测量值为:Trios(0.051毫米)、True Definition(0.09毫米)、iTero(0.236毫米)。IOS在准确性方面存在差异,Trios是最准确的IOS。最终修复体制作完成并粘结。在3个月、6个月和12个月时对患者进行检查,未出现任何生物或机械并发症。在BOPT技术中,使用IOS进行数字印模似乎是制作氧化锆FPD的可行替代方法。口腔内扫描仪、准确性、垂直预备、精度、CAD - CAM、口腔修复学。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e2bb/7511056/7a3657795f64/jced-12-e896-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e2bb/7511056/fd8631860fc8/jced-12-e896-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e2bb/7511056/68dba6b80c05/jced-12-e896-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e2bb/7511056/7a3657795f64/jced-12-e896-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e2bb/7511056/fd8631860fc8/jced-12-e896-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e2bb/7511056/68dba6b80c05/jced-12-e896-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e2bb/7511056/7a3657795f64/jced-12-e896-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative analysis of trueness between conventional and digital impression in dental-supported fixed dental prosthesis with vertical preparation.垂直预备的牙支持式固定义齿中传统印模与数字印模准确性的比较分析
J Clin Exp Dent. 2020 Sep 1;12(9):e896-e901. doi: 10.4317/jced.56967. eCollection 2020 Sep.
2
Comparative analysis on reproducibility among 5 intraoral scanners: sectional analysis according to restoration type and preparation outline form.5种口内扫描仪再现性的比较分析:根据修复类型和预备外形进行的分层分析
J Adv Prosthodont. 2016 Oct;8(5):354-362. doi: 10.4047/jap.2016.8.5.354. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
3
Intraoral digital scans-Part 1: Influence of ambient scanning light conditions on the accuracy (trueness and precision) of different intraoral scanners.口内数字扫描—第 1 部分:环境扫描光照条件对不同口内扫描仪准确性(准确性和精密度)的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Sep;124(3):372-378. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.06.003. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
4
Evaluation of intraoral digital impressions for obtaining gingival contour in the esthetic zone: accuracy outcomes.口腔内数字化印模在获取美学区域牙龈轮廓中的应用评估:准确性结果。
Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Apr;24(4):1401-1410. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-03105-6. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
5
Comparative reproducibility analysis of 6 intraoral scanners used on complex intracoronal preparations.6 种口内扫描仪在复杂的牙内预备体上的可重复性比较分析。
J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Jan;123(1):113-120. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.10.025. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
6
Clinical Study of the Influence of Ambient Light Scanning Conditions on the Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of an Intraoral Scanner.环境光扫描条件对口腔内扫描仪准确性(准确性和精密度)影响的临床研究。
J Prosthodont. 2020 Feb;29(2):107-113. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13135. Epub 2019 Dec 30.
7
Accuracy of Four Intra-Oral Scanners in Subgingival Vertical Preparation: An In Vitro 3-Dimensional Comparative Analysis.四种口腔内扫描仪在龈下垂直预备中的准确性:一项体外三维对比分析
Materials (Basel). 2023 Oct 4;16(19):6553. doi: 10.3390/ma16196553.
8
Trueness of intraoral scanners in digitizing specific locations at the margin and intaglio surfaces of intracoronal preparations.口内扫描仪在数字化牙体预备的牙合面和切缘表面特定位置的准确性。
J Prosthet Dent. 2021 Dec;126(6):779-786. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.09.019. Epub 2020 Nov 8.
9
Trueness and precision of digital impressions obtained using an intraoral scanner with different head size in the partially edentulous mandible.不同头部尺寸的口内扫描仪在部分无牙颌下颌中获取的数字印模的准确性和精确性。
J Prosthodont Res. 2018 Jul;62(3):347-352. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2018.01.003. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
10
Trueness and precision of 5 intraoral scanners in the impressions of single and multiple implants: a comparative in vitro study.5 种口内扫描仪在单颗和多颗种植体印模中的准确性和精确性:一项比较性的体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2019 Jun 6;19(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12903-019-0792-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Present status and future directions: Soft tissue management in prosthodontics.现状与未来方向:口腔修复学中的软组织管理
World J Methodol. 2025 Dec 20;15(4):104497. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v15.i4.104497.
2
Esthetic and Functional Rehabilitation: Retreatment of Anterior Fixed Dental Prothesis With Biologically Oriented Preparation Technique and Digital Workflow.美学与功能康复:采用生物导向预备技术和数字化工作流程对前牙固定义齿进行再治疗
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2025 Mar;37(3):761-770. doi: 10.1111/jerd.13393. Epub 2024 Dec 20.
3
Impact of different lighting conditions on the tooth-shade selection using intra-oral scanners: An study.

本文引用的文献

1
Digital protocol for creating a virtual gingiva adjacent to teeth with subgingival dental preparations.数字化协议用于创建紧邻牙齿的虚拟龈沟,这些牙齿有龈下牙体预备。
J Prosthodont Res. 2020 Oct;64(4):506-514. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2019.10.006. Epub 2019 Nov 28.
2
Evaluation of the trueness and precision of complete arch digital impressions on a human maxilla using seven different intraoral digital impression systems and a laboratory scanner.评价七种不同的口内数字化印模系统和一台实验室扫描仪在人类上颌骨上获取全牙弓数字化印模的真实性和精确性。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019 Jul;31(4):369-377. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12485. Epub 2019 May 6.
3
不同光照条件对使用口腔内扫描仪进行牙齿比色的影响:一项研究。
Heliyon. 2024 Oct 2;10(19):e38870. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38870. eCollection 2024 Oct 15.
4
Accuracy of Four Intra-Oral Scanners in Subgingival Vertical Preparation: An In Vitro 3-Dimensional Comparative Analysis.四种口腔内扫描仪在龈下垂直预备中的准确性:一项体外三维对比分析
Materials (Basel). 2023 Oct 4;16(19):6553. doi: 10.3390/ma16196553.
5
Application of three-dimensional reconstruction technology in dentistry: a narrative review.三维重建技术在牙科中的应用:叙述性综述。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Sep 4;23(1):630. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03142-4.
6
The Potential of Digital Impression in Orthodontics.数字化印模在正畸学中的潜力
Dent J (Basel). 2022 Aug 8;10(8):147. doi: 10.3390/dj10080147.
7
Retrospective Long-Term Clinical Outcome of Feldspathic Ceramic Veneers.长石质陶瓷贴面的回顾性长期临床结果
Materials (Basel). 2022 Mar 15;15(6):2150. doi: 10.3390/ma15062150.
Group 5 ITI Consensus Report: Digital technologies.
第五组 ITI 共识报告:数字技术。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29 Suppl 16:436-442. doi: 10.1111/clr.13309.
4
Is the use of digital technologies for the fabrication of implant-supported reconstructions more efficient and/or more effective than conventional techniques: A systematic review.数字化技术用于制作种植体支持修复体是否比传统技术更有效率和/或更有效:系统评价。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29 Suppl 18:184-195. doi: 10.1111/clr.13300.
5
Prospective Clinical Study of Zirconia Full-coverage Restorations on Teeth Prepared With Biologically Oriented Preparation Technique on Gingival Health: Results After Two-year Follow-up.关于采用生物导向预备技术制备牙齿后进行氧化锆全冠修复对牙龈健康影响的前瞻性临床研究:两年随访结果
Oper Dent. 2018 Sep/Oct;43(5):482-487. doi: 10.2341/17-124-C. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
6
The complete digital workflow in fixed prosthodontics: a systematic review.固定修复学中的完整数字工作流程:一项系统综述
BMC Oral Health. 2017 Sep 19;17(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12903-017-0415-0.
7
Accuracy of four intraoral scanners in oral implantology: a comparative in vitro study.四种口腔内扫描仪在口腔种植学中的准确性:一项体外比较研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2017 Jun 2;17(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12903-017-0383-4.
8
Accuracy in the digital workflow: From data acquisition to the digitally milled cast.数字化工作流程中的准确性:从数据采集到数字铣削铸件。
J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Jun;115(6):749-54. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.004. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
9
Intraoral Digital Impression Technique Compared to Conventional Impression Technique. A Randomized Clinical Trial.口腔内数字印模技术与传统印模技术的比较:一项随机临床试验
J Prosthodont. 2016 Jun;25(4):282-7. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12410. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
10
Patient-centered outcomes comparing digital and conventional implant impression procedures: a randomized crossover trial.比较数字化与传统种植体印模程序的以患者为中心的结果:一项随机交叉试验。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Dec;27(12):e185-e189. doi: 10.1111/clr.12600. Epub 2015 Apr 12.