Hung Tzu-Yun, Hsu Chien-Chin, Chen Kuo-Tai
Chi Mei Medical Center Emergency Department Tainan Taiwan.
Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology Department of Biotechnology Tainan Taiwan.
J Acute Med. 2018 Mar 1;8(1):17-21. doi: 10.6705/j.jacme.201803_8(1).0003.
The prognosis of patients with traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (TOHCA) is poor. Few studies have evaluated whether the commonly conducted in-hospital resuscitative interventions have beneficial effects on the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and survival rate in patients with TOHCA. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective study to reveal the clinical manifestations of patients with TOHCA in Southern Taiwan and evaluate the effectiveness of variouscommon in-hospital interventions in these patients.
This retrospective chart review of patients with TOHCA was conducted in three hospitals in Southern Taiwan between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2016, to demonstrate the characteristics of patients with TOHCA and compare the differences in in-hospital interventions before ROSC between ROSC and non-ROSC groups.
In total, 272 patients with TOHCA were reviewed; their average age was 50.7 years, and men constituted the predominant sex (73.2%). Moreover, 91 patients (33.5%) experienced at least transient ROSC, 40 patients (14.7%) were admitted to hospitals, and 4 patients (1.5%) survived to hospital discharge. The ROSC and non-ROSC groups did not differ in in-hospital interventions, including chest tube and central venous catheter insertions, defibrillation, and pressor infusion. However, the non-ROSC group had a higher rate of transfusion than the ROSC group (17.7% vs. 6.6%, p = 0.015).
The outcomes of patients with TOHCA in Southern Taiwan remained dismal. None of the in-hospital interventions, including blood transfusion, chest tube and central venous catheter insertions, defibrillation, and pressor infusion, were determined to be beneficial for patients with TOHCA. We suggest that these in-hospital interventions should not be routinely performed in every patient with TOHCA.
院外创伤性心脏骤停(TOHCA)患者的预后较差。很少有研究评估常见的院内复苏干预措施对TOHCA患者自主循环恢复(ROSC)和生存率是否有有益影响。因此,我们进行了一项回顾性研究,以揭示台湾南部TOHCA患者的临床表现,并评估各种常见院内干预措施对这些患者的有效性。
对2014年1月1日至2016年12月31日期间台湾南部三家医院的TOHCA患者进行回顾性病历审查,以展示TOHCA患者的特征,并比较ROSC组和未恢复自主循环(non-ROSC)组在ROSC之前的院内干预差异。
共审查了272例TOHCA患者;他们的平均年龄为50.7岁,男性占主导性别(73.2%)。此外,91例患者(33.5%)至少经历过短暂的ROSC,40例患者(14.7%)入院,4例患者(1.5%)存活至出院。ROSC组和non-ROSC组在包括胸腔闭式引流管和中心静脉导管插入、除颤和升压药输注在内的院内干预方面没有差异。然而,non-ROSC组的输血率高于ROSC组(17.7%对6.6%,p = 0.015)。
台湾南部TOHCA患者的预后仍然很差。包括输血、胸腔闭式引流管和中心静脉导管插入、除颤和升压药输注在内的任何院内干预措施都未被确定对TOHCA患者有益。我们建议,这些院内干预措施不应在每例TOHCA患者中常规进行。