Suppr超能文献

处理急救护理服务中预立指示的伦理问题。

Managing ethical aspects of advance directives in emergency care services.

机构信息

University of Barcelona, Spain; 212203Escola Universitària d'Infermeria i Teràpia Ocupacional de Terrassa (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona), Spain; Barcelona College of Nursing, Spain.

University of Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Nurs Ethics. 2021 Feb;28(1):91-105. doi: 10.1177/0969733020952112. Epub 2020 Sep 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In Hospital Emergency Department and Emergency Medical Services professionals experience situations in which they face difficulties or barriers to know patient's advance directives and implement them.

OBJECTIVES

To analyse the barriers, facilitators, and ethical conflicts perceived by health professionals derived from the management of advance directives in emergency services.

RESEARCH DESIGN, PARTICIPANTS, AND CONTEXT: This is a qualitative phenomenological study conducted with purposive sampling including a population of nursing and medical professionals linked to Hospital Emergency Department and Emergency Medical Services. Three focus groups were formed, totalling 24 participants. We performed an inductive-type thematic discourse analysis.

ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS

This study was approved by ethical committees of Ethical Commitee of Clínic Hospital (Barcelona) and Comittee of Emergency Medical Services (Barcelona). The participants received information about the purpose of the study. Patients' anonymity and willingness to participate in the study were guaranteed.

FINDINGS

There were four types of barriers that hindered the proper management of patients' advance directives in Hospital Emergency Department and Emergency Medical Services: personal and professional, family members, organisational and structural, and those derived from the health system. These barriers caused ethical conflicts and hindered professionals' decision-making.

DISCUSSION

These results are in line with those of previous studies and indicate that factors such as gender, professional category, and years of experience, in addition to professionals' beliefs and the opinions of colleagues and family members, can also influence the professionals' final decisions.

CONCLUSION

The different strategies described in this study can contribute to the development of health policies and action protocols to help reduce both the barriers that hinder the correct management and implementation of advance directives and the ethical conflicts generated.

摘要

背景

在医院急诊科和急救医疗服务专业人员的工作中,经常会遇到他们难以或无法了解患者预先指示并执行这些指示的情况。

目的

分析急诊服务中健康专业人员在管理预先指示时遇到的障碍、促进因素和伦理冲突。

研究设计、参与者和背景:这是一项定性现象学研究,采用目的抽样法,包括与医院急诊科和急救医疗服务相关的护理和医疗专业人员。共形成了 3 个焦点小组,共有 24 名参与者。我们进行了一种归纳式主题话语分析。

伦理考虑

这项研究得到了巴塞罗那 Clinic 医院伦理委员会和巴塞罗那急救医疗服务伦理委员会的批准。参与者收到了关于研究目的的信息。保证了患者的匿名性和参与研究的意愿。

发现

有四种类型的障碍阻碍了医院急诊科和急救医疗服务中患者预先指示的妥善管理:个人和专业、家庭成员、组织和结构以及卫生系统衍生的障碍。这些障碍导致了伦理冲突,并阻碍了专业人员的决策。

讨论

这些结果与之前的研究结果一致,表明性别、专业类别、工作年限等因素,以及专业人员的信仰和同事及家属的意见,也可能影响专业人员的最终决策。

结论

本研究中描述的不同策略有助于制定卫生政策和行动计划,以帮助减少阻碍正确管理和执行预先指示的障碍以及产生的伦理冲突。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验