• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评价基于国家综合癌症网络指南的决策支持工具在非小细胞肺癌患者中的应用:一项非随机临床试验。

Evaluation of a National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines-Based Decision Support Tool in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco.

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Sep 1;3(9):e209750. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.9750.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.9750
PMID:32997124
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7527870/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

The association of guideline-based decision support with the quality of care in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is not known.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association of exposure to the National Comprehensive Cancer Center (NCCN) guidelines with guideline-concordant care and patients' decisional conflict.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A nonrandomized clinical trial, conducted at a tertiary care academic institution, enrolled patients from February 23, 2015, to September 28, 2017. Data analysis was conducted from July 19, 2019, to April 22, 2020. A cohort of 76 patients with NSCLC seen at diagnosis or disease progression and a retrospective cohort of 157 patients treated before the trial were included. Adherence to 6 NCCN recommendations were evaluated: (1) smoking cessation counseling, (2) adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with stage IB to IIB NSCLC after surgery, (3) pathologic mediastinal staging in patients with stage III NSCLC before surgery, (4) pathologic mediastinal staging in patients with stage III NSCLC before nonsurgical treatment, (5) definitive chemoradiotherapy for patients with stage III NSCLC not having surgery, and (6) molecular testing for epidermal growth factor receptor and anaplastic lymphoma kinase alterations for patients with stage IV NSCLC. Subgroup analysis was conducted to compare the rates of guideline concordance between the prospective and retrospective cohorts. Secondary end points included decisional conflict and satisfaction.

INTERVENTIONS

An online tool customizing the NCCN guidelines to patients' clinical and pathologic features was used during consultation, facilitated by a trained coordinator.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Concordance of practice with 6 NCCN treatment recommendations on NSCLC and patients' decisional conflict.

RESULTS

Of the 76 patients with NSCLC, 44 were men (57.9%), median age at diagnosis was 68 years (interquartile range [IQR], 41-87 years), and 59 patients (77.6%) had adenocarcinoma. In the retrospective cohort, 91 of 157 patients (58.0%) were men, median age at diagnosis was 66 years (IQR, 61-65 years), and 105 patients (66.9%) had adenocarcinoma. After the intervention, patients received more smoking cessation counseling (4 of 5 [80.0%] vs 1 of 24 [4.2%], P < .001) and less adjuvant chemotherapy (0 of 7 vs 7 of 11 [63.6%]; P = .012). There was no significant change in mutation testing of non-squamous cell stage IV disease (20 of 20 [100%] vs 48 of 57 [84.2%]; P = .10). There was no significant change in pathologic mediastinal staging or initial chemoradiotherapy for patients with stage III disease. After consultation with the tool, decisional conflict scores improved by a median of 20 points (IQR, 3-34; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The findings of this study suggest that exposure to the NCCN guidelines is associated with increased guideline-concordant care for 2 of 6 preselected recommendations and improvement in decisional conflict.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03982459.

摘要

重要性

非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的基于指南的决策支持与护理质量之间的关联尚不清楚。

目的

评估接触国家综合癌症网络(NCCN)指南与指南一致的护理和患者决策冲突之间的关联。

设计、设置和参与者:在三级护理学术机构进行的非随机临床试验,从 2015 年 2 月 23 日至 2017 年 9 月 28 日招募患者。数据分析于 2019 年 7 月 19 日至 2020 年 4 月 22 日进行。包括在诊断或疾病进展时就诊的 76 例 NSCLC 患者队列和在试验前接受治疗的 157 例回顾性队列。评估了 6 项 NCCN 建议的依从性:(1)对吸烟的咨询,(2)手术后 IB 期至 IIB 期 NSCLC 患者的辅助化疗,(3)手术前 III 期 NSCLC 患者的病理纵隔分期,(4)手术前 III 期 NSCLC 患者的病理纵隔分期,(5)无手术治疗的 III 期 NSCLC 患者的确定性放化疗,(6)IV 期 NSCLC 患者的表皮生长因子受体和间变性淋巴瘤激酶改变的分子检测。进行了亚组分析,以比较前瞻性和回顾性队列之间的指南一致性率。次要终点包括决策冲突和满意度。

干预措施

在培训协调员的协助下,使用定制患者临床和病理特征的 NCCN 指南的在线工具进行咨询。

主要结果和措施

6 项 NSCLC 治疗建议与实践的一致性和患者的决策冲突。

结果

76 例 NSCLC 患者中,44 例为男性(57.9%),诊断时中位年龄为 68 岁(四分位距[IQR],41-87 岁),59 例(77.6%)为腺癌。在回顾性队列中,157 例患者中有 91 例(58.0%)为男性,诊断时中位年龄为 66 岁(IQR,61-65 岁),105 例(66.9%)为腺癌。干预后,患者接受了更多的戒烟咨询(4/5 [80.0%] vs 1/24 [4.2%],P <.001)和更少的辅助化疗(0/7 vs 7/11 [63.6%];P =.012)。非鳞状细胞 IV 期疾病的突变检测没有明显变化(20/20 [100%] vs 48/57 [84.2%];P =.10)。III 期疾病患者的病理纵隔分期或初始放化疗没有明显变化。使用工具咨询后,决策冲突评分中位数提高了 20 分(IQR,3-34;P <.001)。

结论和相关性

这项研究的结果表明,接触 NCCN 指南与 6 项预先选定建议中的 2 项更一致的护理和决策冲突的改善有关。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT03982459。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9766/7527870/b2566634207d/jamanetwopen-e209750-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9766/7527870/d74fc89593b6/jamanetwopen-e209750-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9766/7527870/b2566634207d/jamanetwopen-e209750-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9766/7527870/d74fc89593b6/jamanetwopen-e209750-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9766/7527870/b2566634207d/jamanetwopen-e209750-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of a National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines-Based Decision Support Tool in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.评价基于国家综合癌症网络指南的决策支持工具在非小细胞肺癌患者中的应用:一项非随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Sep 1;3(9):e209750. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.9750.
2
Phase 1 Trial of Pembrolizumab Administered Concurrently With Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.帕博利珠单抗联合同步放化疗治疗局部晚期非小细胞肺癌的 1 期临床试验:一项非随机对照试验。
JAMA Oncol. 2020 Jun 1;6(6):848-855. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.6731.
3
Clinical-Pathologic Correlation and Guideline Concordance in Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.可切除非小细胞肺癌的临床病理相关性与指南一致性。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 Sep;108(3):837-844. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.03.062. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
4
Real world study for the concordance between IBM Watson for Oncology and clinical practice in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients at a lung cancer center in China.中国肺癌中心一项针对 IBM Watson 肿瘤与晚期非小细胞肺癌临床实践一致性的真实世界研究。
Thorac Cancer. 2020 May;11(5):1265-1270. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13391. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
5
Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Model to Explore Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Response in Patients With Stage IV EGFR Variant-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.开发和验证一种机器学习模型,以探索 IV 期 EGFR 突变阳性非小细胞肺癌患者对酪氨酸激酶抑制剂的反应。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2030442. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.30442.
6
Adherence to the mediastinal staging guideline and unforeseen N2 disease in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer: Nationwide results from the Dutch Lung Cancer Audit - Surgery.可切除性非小细胞肺癌患者纵隔分期指南的依从性与意外 N2 疾病:荷兰肺癌审计-外科的全国性结果。
Lung Cancer. 2020 Apr;142:51-58. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.02.008. Epub 2020 Feb 15.
7
FDG-PET in staging and restaging non-small cell lung cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: correlation with histopathology.氟代脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描在新辅助放化疗后非小细胞肺癌分期及再分期中的应用:与组织病理学的相关性
Lung Cancer. 2002 Feb;35(2):179-87. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5002(01)00332-4.
8
Lung Cancer Screening Decision Aid Designed for a Primary Care Setting: A Randomized Clinical Trial.用于初级保健环境的肺癌筛查决策辅助工具:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2330452. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.30452.
9
Treatment of stage I and II non-small cell lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines.Ⅰ期和Ⅱ期非小细胞肺癌的治疗:肺癌的诊断和管理,第 3 版:美国胸科医师学会循证临床实践指南。
Chest. 2013 May;143(5 Suppl):e278S-e313S. doi: 10.1378/chest.12-2359.
10
Assessment of the External Validity of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and European Society for Medical Oncology Guidelines for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in a Population of Patients Aged 80 Years and Older.对80岁及以上患者群体中美国国立综合癌症网络和欧洲医学肿瘤学会非小细胞肺癌指南的外部有效性评估。
Clin Lung Cancer. 2017 Sep;18(5):460-471. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2017.03.005. Epub 2017 Mar 21.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radical surgery in stage IB2/IIA2 squamous cell cervical cancers.根治性手术前新辅助化疗在 IB2/IIA2 期宫颈鳞癌中的作用。
BMC Womens Health. 2024 Jun 22;24(1):365. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-03215-8.
2
SIRPG promotes lung squamous cell carcinoma pathogenesis via M1 macrophages: a multi-omics study integrating data and Mendelian randomization.SIRPG通过M1巨噬细胞促进肺鳞状细胞癌发病机制:一项整合数据和孟德尔随机化的多组学研究
Front Oncol. 2024 Jun 4;14:1392417. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1392417. eCollection 2024.
3
The impact of decision tools during oncological consultation with lung cancer patients: A systematic review within the I3LUNG project.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of a web-based prostate cancer treatment decision aid on patient-reported decision process parameters: results from the Prostate Cancer Patient Centered Care trial.基于网络的前列腺癌治疗决策辅助工具对患者报告的决策过程参数的影响:来自前列腺癌患者为中心的护理试验的结果。
Support Care Cancer. 2018 Nov;26(11):3739-3748. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4236-8. Epub 2018 May 12.
2
Decision support systems for incurable non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review.不可治愈的非小细胞肺癌决策支持系统:一项系统综述
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Oct 2;17(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0542-1.
3
Guideline-concordant Care Improves Overall Survival for Locally Advanced Non-Small-cell Lung Carcinoma Patients: A National Cancer Database Analysis.
决策工具在肺癌患者肿瘤学咨询中的影响:I3LUNG 项目内的系统评价。
Cancer Med. 2024 May;13(9):e7159. doi: 10.1002/cam4.7159.
4
The predictive accuracy of CT radiomics combined with machine learning in predicting the invasiveness of small nodular lung adenocarcinoma.CT影像组学联合机器学习在预测小实性肺腺癌侵袭性方面的预测准确性
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2023 Mar 31;12(3):530-546. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-23-82. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
5
Adding predictive and diagnostic values of pulmonary ground-glass nodules on lung cancer novel non-invasive tests.增加肺部磨玻璃结节在肺癌新型非侵入性检测中的预测和诊断价值。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Aug 18;9:936595. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.936595. eCollection 2022.
6
Trends in guideline implementation: an updated scoping review.指南实施趋势:更新的范围综述。
Implement Sci. 2022 Jul 23;17(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01223-6.
指南一致的治疗可改善局部晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的总生存:一项国家癌症数据库分析。
Clin Lung Cancer. 2017 Nov;18(6):706-718. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2017.04.009. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
4
Systemic Treatment Patterns With Advanced or Recurrent Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in Japan: A Retrospective Hospital Administrative Database Study.日本晚期或复发性非小细胞肺癌的系统治疗模式:一项回顾性医院管理数据库研究
Clin Ther. 2017 Jun;39(6):1146-1160. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.04.010. Epub 2017 May 18.
5
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临医疗治疗或筛查决策的人们提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 12;4(4):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5.
6
Influence of Age on Guideline-Concordant Cancer Care for Elderly Patients in the United States.年龄对美国老年患者指南一致性癌症护理的影响。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Jul 15;98(4):748-757. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.01.228. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
7
Preferences of lung cancer patients for treatment and decision-making: a systematic literature review.肺癌患者对治疗及决策的偏好:一项系统文献综述
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2016 Jul;25(4):580-91. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12425. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
8
Disparities in Lung Cancer Care and Outcomes among Elderly in a Medically Underserved State Population-A Cancer Registry-Linked Database Study.医疗服务欠缺州老年人群肺癌治疗与结局的差异——一项与癌症登记处关联的数据库研究
Popul Health Manag. 2016 Apr;19(2):109-19. doi: 10.1089/pop.2015.0027. Epub 2015 Jun 18.
9
Guideline-concordant cancer care and survival among American Indian/Alaskan Native patients.美国印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民患者符合指南的癌症护理和生存情况。
Cancer. 2014 Jul 15;120(14):2183-90. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28683. Epub 2014 Apr 7.
10
Toward Minimum Standards for Certifying Patient Decision Aids: A Modified Delphi Consensus Process.迈向患者决策辅助工具认证的最低标准:一种改进的德尔菲共识过程。
Med Decis Making. 2014 Aug;34(6):699-710. doi: 10.1177/0272989X13501721. Epub 2013 Aug 20.