• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者的就诊依从性和视力结果:DRCRnet 协议 T 的二次分析。

Visit adherence and visual acuity outcomes in patients with diabetic macular edema: a secondary analysis of DRCRnet Protocol T.

机构信息

Scheie Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pennsylvania, 51 North 39th St, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.

Center for Preventative Ophthalmology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021 Jun;259(6):1419-1425. doi: 10.1007/s00417-020-04944-w. Epub 2020 Sep 30.

DOI:10.1007/s00417-020-04944-w
PMID:32997285
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8007682/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To quantify the association between visit adherence and visual acuity (VA) in diabetic macular edema (DME).

METHODS

This secondary analysis of the 2-year DRCRnet Protocol T study of 656 patients required one visit every 4 weeks in the first year, then at variable 4-16-week intervals in the second year. Visit adherence measured as number of missed visits, average (avg days) and longest (max days) visit interval, average (avg missed days) and longest (max missed days) unintended visit interval, and visit constancy (percentage of 3-month periods with at least 1 visit). Avg and max missed days were categorized as on time (0 days), late (> 0-60 days), and very late (> 60 days). Primary outcome was change in ETDRS VA between baseline study visit and last attended visit, using multivariate linear regression models controlling for age, gender, race, ethnicity, treatment arm, baseline VA, hemoglobin A1c, insulin use, and number of lasers and injections.

RESULTS

Mean number of missed visits was 1.7. 616 (94%) patients had 100% visit constancy. A total of 331 (51%) patients were on time, 171 (26%) late, and 154 (23%) very late in avg missed days. Max missed days ranged 0-696 days. Adjusted, each missed visit was associated with 0.3-letter decrease (95%CI - 0.6, - 0.1, p = 0.02); being very late in avg and max missed days saw - 4.2 letters (95%CI - 6.4, - 2.0, p < 0.001) and - 4.0 letters (95%CI - 6.1, - 1.9, p < 0.001), respectively, than on time. Those that averaged > 4 days missed per attended visit saw 4.6 letters worse (95%CI - 7.3, - 2.0, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Visit adherence is associated with visual acuity outcomes in DME patients.

摘要

目的

定量研究糖尿病黄斑水肿(DME)患者就诊依从性与视力(VA)之间的关系。

方法

本研究为 DRCRnet 协议 T 研究的二次分析,共纳入 656 例患者,研究时间为 2 年。在研究的前 1 年,患者每 4 周就诊 1 次,第 2 年的就诊间隔为 4-16 周不等。通过错过就诊次数、平均(avg days)和最长(max days)就诊间隔、平均(avg missed days)和最长(max missed days)非计划就诊间隔以及就诊稳定性(3 个月期间至少就诊 1 次的比例)来评估就诊依从性。将平均错过就诊天数分为按时(0 天)、延迟(0-60 天)和严重延迟(>60 天)。主要结局是使用多元线性回归模型,在控制年龄、性别、种族、民族、治疗组、基线 VA、糖化血红蛋白、胰岛素使用以及激光和注射次数的情况下,比较基线研究就诊时和最后一次就诊时的 ETDRS VA 变化。

结果

平均错过就诊次数为 1.7 次。616 例(94%)患者就诊稳定性为 100%。331 例(51%)患者按时就诊,171 例(26%)延迟就诊,154 例(23%)严重延迟就诊。平均错过就诊天数为 0-696 天。调整后,每次错过就诊与视力下降 0.3 个字母相关(95%CI - 0.6,- 0.1,p = 0.02);与按时就诊相比,平均和最长错过就诊天数严重延迟的患者视力分别下降 4.2 个字母(95%CI - 6.4,- 2.0,p < 0.001)和 4.0 个字母(95%CI - 6.1,- 1.9,p < 0.001)。与每次按时就诊相比,每次就诊错过平均就诊时间 4 天以上的患者视力下降 4.6 个字母(95%CI - 7.3,- 2.0,p < 0.001)。

结论

DME 患者的就诊依从性与视力结局相关。

相似文献

1
Visit adherence and visual acuity outcomes in patients with diabetic macular edema: a secondary analysis of DRCRnet Protocol T.糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者的就诊依从性和视力结果:DRCRnet 协议 T 的二次分析。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021 Jun;259(6):1419-1425. doi: 10.1007/s00417-020-04944-w. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
2
Visit Adherence and Visual Acuity in Study of COmparative Treatments for REtinal Vein Occlusion 2 (SCORE2).研究比较治疗视网膜静脉阻塞 2 期(SCORE2)的依从性和视力。
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2024 Feb;31(1):78-83. doi: 10.1080/09286586.2023.2187070. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
3
Association of Visit Adherence and Visual Acuity in Patients With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Secondary Analysis of the Comparison of Age-Related Macular Degeneration Treatment Trial.患者就诊依从性与视力的相关性分析:年龄相关性黄斑变性治疗试验的二次分析。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020 Mar 1;138(3):237-242. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.4577.
4
Five-Year Outcomes after Initial Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, or Ranibizumab Treatment for Diabetic Macular Edema (Protocol T Extension Study).初始阿柏西普、贝伐单抗或雷珠单抗治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿的 5 年结果(协议 T 扩展研究)。
Ophthalmology. 2020 Sep;127(9):1201-1210. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.03.021. Epub 2020 Mar 29.
5
Practical Lessons from Protocol T for the Management of Diabetic Macular Edema.糖尿病性黄斑水肿管理的T方案实用经验
Dev Ophthalmol. 2017;60:109-124. doi: 10.1159/000459694. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
6
A multicenter, 12-month randomized study comparing dexamethasone intravitreal implant with ranibizumab in patients with diabetic macular edema.一项多中心、为期12个月的随机研究,比较地塞米松玻璃体内植入物与雷珠单抗治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者的疗效。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017 Mar;255(3):463-473. doi: 10.1007/s00417-016-3472-1. Epub 2016 Sep 8.
7
Effect of Adding Dexamethasone to Continued Ranibizumab Treatment in Patients With Persistent Diabetic Macular Edema: A DRCR Network Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.持续给予瑞巴派特与添加地塞米松治疗持续性糖尿病黄斑水肿患者的效果:DRCR 网络的一项 2 期随机临床试验。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018 Jan 1;136(1):29-38. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.4914.
8
Impact of ranibizumab on visual impairment in patients with bilateral diabetic macular edema.雷珠单抗对双侧糖尿病黄斑水肿患者视力障碍的影响。
Acta Diabetol. 2019 Jan;56(1):67-71. doi: 10.1007/s00592-018-1210-3. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
9
Real-World Outcomes after 36-Month Treatment with Ranibizumab 0.5 mg in Patients with Visual Impairment due to Diabetic Macular Edema (BOREAL-DME).接受雷珠单抗 0.5mg36 个月治疗后糖尿病黄斑水肿致视力损害患者的真实世界结局(BOREAL-DME)。
Ophthalmic Res. 2021;64(4):577-586. doi: 10.1159/000511591. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
10
Vision Outcomes Following Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema in Clinical Practice.临床实践中抗血管内皮生长因子治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿的视力结果。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2018 Jul;191:83-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.04.010. Epub 2018 Apr 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers and Facilitators to Ophthalmology Visit Adherence in an Urban Hospital Setting.城市医院环境中影响眼科就诊依从性的因素分析。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2023 Oct 3;12(10):11. doi: 10.1167/tvst.12.10.11.
2
Non-adherence and non-persistence to intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.不遵医用药和治疗中断:抗血管内皮生长因子(抗-VEGF)眼内治疗的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Syst Rev. 2023 Jun 2;12(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02261-x.
3
Health Disparities in Lapses in Diabetic Retinopathy Care.糖尿病视网膜病变护理失误中的健康差异。
Ophthalmol Sci. 2023 Mar 4;3(3):100295. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2023.100295. eCollection 2023 Sep.
4
Visit Adherence and Visual Acuity in Study of COmparative Treatments for REtinal Vein Occlusion 2 (SCORE2).研究比较治疗视网膜静脉阻塞 2 期(SCORE2)的依从性和视力。
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2024 Feb;31(1):78-83. doi: 10.1080/09286586.2023.2187070. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
5
Evaluating the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema with Aflibercept Based on a Regional Network of Ophthalmologic Care Givers.基于眼科护理人员区域网络评估阿柏西普治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿的效果
J Ophthalmol. 2023 Jan 10;2023:3165965. doi: 10.1155/2023/3165965. eCollection 2023.
6
Social Determinants of Health and Impact on Screening, Prevalence, and Management of Diabetic Retinopathy in Adults: A Narrative Review.成人糖尿病视网膜病变筛查、患病率及管理中的健康社会决定因素:一项叙述性综述
J Clin Med. 2022 Nov 30;11(23):7120. doi: 10.3390/jcm11237120.
7
Effects of COVID-19 on Intravitreal Injection Clinic After Lockdown.新冠疫情封锁后对玻璃体内注射门诊的影响
Clin Ophthalmol. 2022 Sep 19;16:3089-3096. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S358239. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Trends in the Care of Diabetic Macular Edema: Analysis of a National Cohort.糖尿病性黄斑水肿的治疗趋势:一项全国性队列研究分析
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 24;11(2):e0149450. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149450. eCollection 2016.