• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Health Disparities in Lapses in Diabetic Retinopathy Care.糖尿病视网膜病变护理失误中的健康差异。
Ophthalmol Sci. 2023 Mar 4;3(3):100295. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2023.100295. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
Anti-VEGF drugs compared with laser photocoagulation for the treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.抗血管内皮生长因子药物与激光光凝术治疗增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变的比较:一项系统评价和个体参与者数据荟萃分析
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Apr 2:1-75. doi: 10.3310/MJYP6578.
3
Are Detailed, Patient-level Social Determinant of Health Factors Associated With Physical Function and Mental Health at Presentation Among New Patients With Orthopaedic Conditions?详细的患者层面的健康社会决定因素是否与新骨科患者就诊时的身体功能和心理健康相关?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 May 1;481(5):912-921. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002446. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
4
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
5
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
6
Racial and ethnic disparities in fecundability: a North American preconception cohort study.生育力方面的种族和族裔差异:一项北美孕前队列研究。
Hum Reprod. 2025 Apr 17. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaf067.
7
Anti-VEGF drugs compared with laser photocoagulation for the treatment of diabetic retinopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.抗血管内皮生长因子药物与激光光凝术治疗糖尿病性视网膜病变的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Dec 11:1-71. doi: 10.3310/PCGV5709.
8
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
9
Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for diabetic macular oedema: a network meta-analysis.抗血管内皮生长因子治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 22;6(6):CD007419. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007419.pub5.
10
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Patients' Perspectives on Social Barriers to Care and the Acceptability and Impact of a Community Health Worker Program in Outpatient Ophthalmology.患者对门诊眼科护理社会障碍以及社区卫生工作者项目的可接受性和影响的看法。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2025 Aug 8;19:2647-2657. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S541632. eCollection 2025.
2
Comparing the Use of Administrative Claims with the Electronic Health Record Data for Identifying Diabetic Retinopathy Examinations.比较行政索赔数据与电子健康记录数据在识别糖尿病视网膜病变检查中的应用。
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2025 Jul 8:1-6. doi: 10.1080/09286586.2025.2528675.
3
Unequal Referral Patterns to Ophthalmology Subspecialists Based on Race and Ethnicity in Diabetes Mellitus: A Retrospective Analysis.糖尿病患者中基于种族和族裔的眼科亚专科转诊模式不平等:一项回顾性分析。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2025 May 17;19:1609-1616. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S519979. eCollection 2025.
4
Baseline Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes of Patients Seen Through the Free Diabetes Screening (FDS) Program.通过免费糖尿病筛查(FDS)项目就诊患者的基线特征和临床结局
Clin Ophthalmol. 2024 Nov 11;18:3227-3236. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S483004. eCollection 2024.
5
Association of Neighborhood Socioeconomic Disadvantage with Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy.社区社会经济劣势与增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变的关联
Ophthalmol Retina. 2025 Feb;9(2):98-104. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2024.10.012. Epub 2024 Oct 18.
6
The Role of Urban Residence, Race and Ethnicity, and Glycemic Control in Receiving Standards of Care and Progression to Vision-Threatening Diabetic Retinopathy.城市居住情况、种族和民族以及血糖控制在接受标准治疗和进展为威胁视力的糖尿病视网膜病变中的作用。
Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan 1;48(1):29-37. doi: 10.2337/dci24-0024.
7
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Receipt of Retinal Imaging Among Patients With Diabetes.糖尿病患者视网膜成像接受情况中的种族和民族差异
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2024 Oct 10;142(11):1091-4. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.4120.
8
Improving the Identification of Diabetic Retinopathy and Related Conditions in the Electronic Health Record Using Natural Language Processing Methods.使用自然语言处理方法改善电子健康记录中糖尿病视网膜病变及相关病症的识别
Ophthalmol Sci. 2024 Jul 18;4(6):100578. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2024.100578. eCollection 2024 Nov-Dec.
9
Social Risk Groups in Patients With Diabetes With Differing Eye Care Utilization and Vision Outcomes.不同眼部护理利用和视力结果的糖尿病患者的社会风险群体。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2024 Mar 1;13(3):13. doi: 10.1167/tvst.13.3.13.

本文引用的文献

1
The Impact of COVID-19 on Missed Ophthalmology Clinic Visits.新冠疫情对眼科门诊就诊缺失的影响。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2021 Dec 8;15:4645-4657. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S341739. eCollection 2021.
2
Lapses in Care Among Patients Assigned to Ranibizumab for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.接受雷珠单抗治疗增生性糖尿病视网膜病变患者的护理失误:一项随机临床试验的事后分析。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2021 Dec 1;139(12):1266-1273. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2021.4103.
3
Social determinants of health impacting adherence to diabetic retinopathy examinations.影响糖尿病视网膜病变检查依从性的健康社会决定因素。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2021 Sep;9(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2021-002374.
4
Social Determinants of Health and Diabetes: A Scientific Review.健康与糖尿病的社会决定因素:一项科学综述。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Nov 2;44(1):258-79. doi: 10.2337/dci20-0053.
5
Visit adherence and visual acuity outcomes in patients with diabetic macular edema: a secondary analysis of DRCRnet Protocol T.糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者的就诊依从性和视力结果:DRCRnet 协议 T 的二次分析。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021 Jun;259(6):1419-1425. doi: 10.1007/s00417-020-04944-w. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
6
Effect of ICD-9 to ICD-10 Transition on Accuracy of Codes for Stage of Diabetic Retinopathy and Related Complications: Results from the CODER Study.ICD-9 到 ICD-10 转换对糖尿病视网膜病变及其相关并发症分期编码准确性的影响:来自 CODER 研究的结果。
Ophthalmol Retina. 2021 Apr;5(4):374-380. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2020.08.004. Epub 2020 Aug 15.
7
Extraction and Analysis of Clinically Important Follow-up Recommendations in a Large Radiology Dataset.大型放射学数据集中临床重要随访建议的提取与分析
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2020 May 30;2020:335-344. eCollection 2020.
8
Predictors of Lost to Follow-Up in Patients Being Treated for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy.增殖型糖尿病视网膜病变患者失访的预测因素。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2020 Aug;216:18-27. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.03.023. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
9
Loss to Follow-Up Among Patients With Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy in Clinical Practice.增生型糖尿病视网膜病变患者临床随访丢失情况。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2020 Jul;215:66-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.03.011. Epub 2020 Mar 21.
10
Causes and Clinical Impact of Loss to Follow-Up in Patients with Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy.增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变患者失访的原因及临床影响
J Ophthalmol. 2020 Feb 8;2020:7691724. doi: 10.1155/2020/7691724. eCollection 2020.

糖尿病视网膜病变护理失误中的健康差异。

Health Disparities in Lapses in Diabetic Retinopathy Care.

作者信息

Cai Cindy X, Tran Diep, Tang Tina, Liou Wilson, Harrigian Keith, Scott Emily, Nagy Paul, Kharrazi Hadi, Crews Deidra C, Zeger Scott L

机构信息

Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

Department of Computer Science, Whiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.

出版信息

Ophthalmol Sci. 2023 Mar 4;3(3):100295. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2023.100295. eCollection 2023 Sep.

DOI:10.1016/j.xops.2023.100295
PMID:37063252
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10090804/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop a novel methodology to identify lapses in diabetic retinopathy care in electronic health records (EHRs) and evaluate health disparities by race and ethnicity.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SUBJECTS

Adult patients with diabetes mellitus who were evaluated at the Wilmer Eye Institute from January 1, 2013 to April 2, 2022.

METHODS

The methodology to identify lapses in care first identified diabetic retinopathy screening or treatment visits and then compared the providers' recommended follow-up timeframe with the patient's actual time to next encounter. The association of race and ethnicity with odds of lapses in care was evaluated using a mixed-effects logistic regression model controlling for age, sex, insurance, severity of diabetic retinopathy, presence of other retinal disorders, and glaucoma.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Lapses in diabetic retinopathy care.

RESULTS

The methodology to identify diabetic retinopathy-related visits had a 95.0% (95% confidence interval, 93.0-96.6) sensitivity and 98.8% (98.1-99.3) specificity as compared with a gold standard grader. The methodology resulted in a 97.3% (96.2-98.4) sensitivity and 98.1% (97.3-98.9) specificity for detecting a follow-up recommendation, with an average error of -0.05 (-0.31 to 0.21) weeks in extracting the precise timeframe. A total of 39 561 patients with 91 104 office visits were included in the analysis. The average age was 61.4 years. More than 3 (77.6%) in 4 patients had a lapse in care. In multivariable analysis, non-Hispanic Black patients had 1.24 (1.19-1.30) odds and Hispanic patients had 1.26 (1.13-1.40) odds of ever having a lapse in care compared with non-Hispanic White patients ( < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

We have developed a reliable methodology for identifying lapses in diabetic retinopathy care that is tailored to a provider's recommended follow-up. Using this approach, we find that 3 in 4 patients experience a lapse in diabetic retinopathy care and that these rates are higher among non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic patients. Deploying this methodology in the EHR is one potential means by which to identify and mitigate lapses in critical ophthalmic care in patients with diabetes.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

摘要

目的

开发一种新方法,以识别电子健康记录(EHR)中糖尿病视网膜病变护理的失误,并按种族和民族评估健康差异。

设计

回顾性队列研究。

研究对象

2013年1月1日至2022年4月2日在威尔默眼科研究所接受评估的成年糖尿病患者。

方法

识别护理失误的方法首先确定糖尿病视网膜病变筛查或治疗就诊情况,然后将提供者建议的随访时间框架与患者下次就诊的实际时间进行比较。使用混合效应逻辑回归模型评估种族和民族与护理失误几率的关联,该模型控制了年龄、性别、保险、糖尿病视网膜病变的严重程度、其他视网膜疾病的存在情况以及青光眼。

主要观察指标

糖尿病视网膜病变护理失误。

结果

与金标准分级员相比,识别糖尿病视网膜病变相关就诊的方法敏感性为95.0%(95%置信区间,93.0 - 96.6),特异性为98.8%(98.1 - 99.3)。该方法检测随访建议的敏感性为97.3%(96.2 - 98.4),特异性为98.1%(97.3 - 98.9),提取精确时间框架时的平均误差为 -0.05(-0.31至0.21)周。分析共纳入39561例患者的91104次门诊就诊。平均年龄为61.4岁。每4名患者中超过3名(77.6%)存在护理失误。在多变量分析中,与非西班牙裔白人患者相比,非西班牙裔黑人患者出现护理失误的几率为1.24(1.19 - 1.30),西班牙裔患者为1.26(1.13 - 1.40)(P均<0.001)。

结论

我们开发了一种可靠的方法来识别糖尿病视网膜病变护理中的失误,该方法是根据提供者建议的随访量身定制的。使用这种方法,我们发现四分之三的患者存在糖尿病视网膜病变护理失误,并且在非西班牙裔黑人和西班牙裔患者中这些发生率更高。在电子健康记录中应用这种方法是识别和减少糖尿病患者关键眼科护理失误的一种潜在手段。

财务披露

专有或商业披露信息可在参考文献之后找到。