Trends in the Care of Diabetic Macular Edema: Analysis of a National Cohort.

PURPOSE

To evaluate how the monitoring and treatment for diabetic macular edema (DME) has changed in a national sample.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Administrative medical claims data from a large, national U.S. insurer.

STUDY POPULATION

Beneficiaries of a U.S. insurance company.

OBSERVATION PROCEDURES

All incident cases of DME were found. Those in years 2002/3, 2006 and 2010 were followed for a 2-year observation period and those from 2009, 2010 and 2011 for a 1-year observation period.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Types and frequencies of treatment were tallied and compared over each of the cohorts.

RESULTS

Two-year cohorts had 233, 251 and 756 patients in 2002/3, 2006 and 2010 respectively. One-year cohorts had 1002, 1119 and 1382 patients in 2009, 2010 and 2011, respectively. Both percentage of patients receiving therapy and number of treatments given increased across the 2-year cohorts for both focal laser and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) (p<0.001). The highest use of anti-VEGF agents in any of the cohorts was in the 2011 1-year group that only averaged 3.78 injections. Focal laser was used 2.5x as frequently as anti-VEGF injections in the most recent cohorts with only a high of 14.0% of DME patients receiving anti-VEGF therapy in any of the cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Regardless of treatment modality (laser or injection) DME patients received vastly fewer treatments than patients in randomized control trials. Despite the proven superior visual outcomes of anti-VEGF agents over focal laser in DME, focal laser was still used more frequently.