Suppr超能文献

对于采用线上线下混合模式接受听力服务而言,数字技能并非重大障碍。

Digital Proficiency Is Not a Significant Barrier for Taking Up Hearing Services With a Hybrid Online and Face-to-Face Model.

作者信息

Ratanjee-Vanmali Husmita, Swanepoel De Wet, Laplante-Lévesque Ariane

机构信息

Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, South Africa.

Ear Sciences Centre, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Australia.

出版信息

Am J Audiol. 2020 Dec 9;29(4):785-808. doi: 10.1044/2020_AJA-19-00117. Epub 2020 Sep 30.

Abstract

Purpose The aim of this study was to determine the effect of self-perceived digital proficiency on the uptake of hearing services through a hybrid online and face-to-face hearing health care model. Method Adults were recruited via online methods to complete an online hearing screening test within the greater Durban area in South Africa. On submission of contact details after failing the screening, contact was made via telephone to assess readiness for further hearing care. If motivated and willing to continue, a face-to-face appointment for diagnostic hearing testing was confirmed, at which time an e-mail with an online mobile device and computer proficiency survey was sent. Hearing services were offered using combined online and face-to-face methods. Results Within 2 years (June 2017 to June 2019), 1,259 people from the target location submitted their details for the clinic audiologist to contact, of whom 931 participants (73.95%) failed the screening test. Of these participants, 5.69% (53/931, 57.41% men) attended a face-to-face diagnostic hearing evaluation. Mobile device and computer proficiency scores were not a predictor of acquiring hearing services. Age was the only significant predictor ( = .018) for those continuing with hearing care. Patients who continued with hearing care by acquiring hearing aids and support services were older ( = 73.63 years, = 11.62) and on average aware of their hearing loss for a longer time ( = 14.71 years, = 15.77), as compared to those who discontinued hearing health care who were younger ( = 59.21 years, = 14.42) and on average aware of their hearing loss for a shorter time ( = 6.37 years, = 9.26). Conclusions Digital proficiency is not a predictor for acquiring hearing services through a hybrid online and face-to-face hearing care model. Hybrid services could allow professionals to assist patients in a combination of face-to-face and online services tailored to meet individual needs, including convenience and personalized care.

摘要

目的 本研究旨在通过线上与面对面相结合的听力保健模式,确定自我感知的数字技能对听力服务接受情况的影响。方法 通过线上方式招募成年人,在南非德班大区完成一项在线听力筛查测试。筛查未通过后提交联系方式的,通过电话联系评估其接受进一步听力护理的意愿。如果有积极性且愿意继续,将确认进行面对面的诊断性听力测试预约,届时会发送一封包含在线移动设备和计算机技能调查问卷的电子邮件。使用线上和面对面相结合的方法提供听力服务。结果 在2年时间内(2017年6月至2019年6月),目标地点的1259人提交了详细信息供诊所听力学家联系,其中931名参与者(73.95%)筛查测试未通过。在这些参与者中,5.69%(53/931,男性占57.41%)参加了面对面的诊断性听力评估。移动设备和计算机技能得分不是获得听力服务的预测因素。年龄是继续接受听力护理者的唯一显著预测因素(P = 0.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验