• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在 COVID-19 大流行期间,支持非正规护理人员的组织采用数字技术对服务使用、组织绩效和护理人员的幸福感产生影响:基于人群的回顾性数据库研究,嵌入用户调查。

Digital Adoption by an Organization Supporting Informal Caregivers During COVID-19 Pandemic Showing Impact on Service Use, Organizational Performance, and Carers' Well-Being: Retrospective Population-Based Database Study With Embedded User Survey.

机构信息

Research Centre for Healthcare & Communities, Coventry University, Coventry, United Kingdom.

Department of Economics, Institute of Business Administration (IBA), Karachi, Pakistan.

出版信息

JMIR Aging. 2024 May 13;7:e46414. doi: 10.2196/46414.

DOI:10.2196/46414
PMID:38739915
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11130774/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic has catalyzed a move from face-to-face to digital delivery of services by hospitals and primary care. However, little is known about the impact of digital transformation on organizations supporting unpaid caregivers. Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, the value of care provided by such informal caregivers is estimated to be £111 billion (US$ 152.7 billion) in England.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to analyze service uptake patterns (including digital service options) over the pandemic period in an English caregivers' support organization covering a population of 0.98 million; measure changes in organizational performance, service efficiency, and quality; and identify the views of caregivers on service provision and future digital delivery.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of the use of digital versus nondigital support services (January 2019 to June 2021) by caregivers in city and rural geographic areas. We compared organizational performance and service quality indicators for 2 financial years (2019-2020 and 2020-2021). A survey was conducted to identify barriers and facilitators to digital service uptake, the computer proficiency of caregivers (the Computer Proficiency Questionnaire, 12-item version), and preferences for future digital service provision. Quantitative data were analyzed using Stata 13 (StataCorp LLC). Thematic analysis was used for open-text survey responses.

RESULTS

The number of caregivers registered with the organization rose from 14,817 in 2019 to 20,237 in 2021. Monthly contacts rose from 1929 to 6741, with remote contacts increasing from 48.89% (943/1929) to 86.68% (5843/6741); distinctive patterns were observed for city versus rural caregivers. There was an increase in one-to-one contacts (88.8%) and caregiver assessments (20.9%), with no expansion in staffing. Service quality indicators showed an improvement in 5 of 8 variables (all P<.05). The 152 carers completing the survey had similar demographics to all registered caregivers. The Computer Proficiency Questionnaire, 12-item version, mean score of 25.61 (SD 4.40) indicated relatively high computer proficiency. The analysis of open-text responses identified a preference for the organization to continue to offer face-to-face services as well as web-based options. The digital services that were the most highly rated were carers' well-being assessments, support needs checks, and peer support groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings show that staff in the caregiver support organization were agile in adapting their services to digital delivery while dealing with increased numbers of registered clients and higher monthly contacts, all without obvious detriment to service quality. Caregivers indicated a preference for blended services, even while recording high computer proficiency. Considering the economic importance of unpaid caregivers, more attention should be given to organizations funded to provide support for them and to the potential for technology to enhance caregivers' access to, and engagement with, such services.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/575c/11130774/6d31fe88090e/aging_v7i1e46414_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/575c/11130774/001779a6ab57/aging_v7i1e46414_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/575c/11130774/bc3e3818a2f0/aging_v7i1e46414_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/575c/11130774/6d31fe88090e/aging_v7i1e46414_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/575c/11130774/001779a6ab57/aging_v7i1e46414_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/575c/11130774/bc3e3818a2f0/aging_v7i1e46414_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/575c/11130774/6d31fe88090e/aging_v7i1e46414_fig3.jpg
摘要

背景

新冠疫情加速了医院和基层医疗机构从面对面服务向数字化服务的转变。然而,对于数字化转型对支持非付费护理人员的组织的影响,我们知之甚少。自新冠疫情开始以来,英格兰估计此类非正式护理人员所提供的护理价值为 1110 亿英镑(1527 亿美元)。

目的

本研究旨在分析在覆盖 0.98 百万人口的英国护理人员支持组织中,在疫情期间服务(包括数字服务选项)的使用模式;衡量组织绩效、服务效率和质量的变化;并确定护理人员对服务提供和未来数字交付的看法。

方法

这是对城市和农村地区护理人员使用数字与非数字支持服务(2019 年 1 月至 2021 年 6 月)的回顾性分析。我们比较了 2 个财政年度(2019-2020 年和 2020-2021 年)的组织绩效和服务质量指标。进行了一项调查,以确定数字服务采用的障碍和促进因素、护理人员的计算机熟练程度(计算机熟练程度问卷,12 项版本),以及对未来数字服务提供的偏好。使用 Stata 13(StataCorp LLC)分析定量数据。对开放式调查回复进行了主题分析。

结果

组织注册护理人员数量从 2019 年的 14817 人增加到 2021 年的 20237 人。每月联系次数从 1929 次增加到 6741 次,远程联系次数从 48.89%(943/1929)增加到 86.68%(5843/6741);城市与农村护理人员的模式明显不同。一对一联系(88.8%)和护理人员评估(20.9%)有所增加,而员工人数没有增加。服务质量指标显示 8 个变量中有 5 个(均 P<.05)有所改善。完成调查的 152 名护理人员与所有注册护理人员的人口统计学特征相似。计算机熟练程度问卷 12 项版本的平均得分为 25.61(SD 4.40),表明计算机熟练程度相对较高。对开放式文本回复的分析表明,护理人员支持组织继续提供面对面服务以及基于网络的选项的偏好。评价最高的数字服务是护理人员的幸福感评估、支持需求检查和同伴支持小组。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,在应对注册客户数量增加和每月联系次数增加的情况下,护理人员支持组织的员工能够灵活地将其服务适应数字化交付,而不会对服务质量造成明显影响。护理人员表示更喜欢混合服务,即使他们记录了较高的计算机熟练程度。考虑到非付费护理人员的经济重要性,应该更加关注为他们提供支持的组织,并关注技术增强护理人员获得和参与此类服务的潜力。

相似文献

1
Digital Adoption by an Organization Supporting Informal Caregivers During COVID-19 Pandemic Showing Impact on Service Use, Organizational Performance, and Carers' Well-Being: Retrospective Population-Based Database Study With Embedded User Survey.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,支持非正规护理人员的组织采用数字技术对服务使用、组织绩效和护理人员的幸福感产生影响:基于人群的回顾性数据库研究,嵌入用户调查。
JMIR Aging. 2024 May 13;7:e46414. doi: 10.2196/46414.
2
Current experience and future potential of facilitating access to digital NHS primary care services in England: the Di-Facto mixed-methods study.当前在英格兰促进获取数字国民保健服务初级保健服务的经验和未来潜力:Di-Facto 混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Sep;12(32):1-197. doi: 10.3310/JKYT5803.
3
A rapid mixed-methods evaluation of remote home monitoring models during the COVID-19 pandemic in England.英格兰 COVID-19 大流行期间远程家庭监护模式的快速混合方法评估。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Jul;11(13):1-151. doi: 10.3310/FVQW4410.
4
Knowledge Families Hold: Co-Production and Co-Research With Mental Health Family Carers in Understanding Experiences During the COVID-19 Pandemic.知识家族的持有:在理解 COVID-19 大流行期间的经验方面,与心理健康家庭照顾者共同生产和共同研究。
Health Expect. 2024 Dec;27(6):e70093. doi: 10.1111/hex.70093.
5
The Resilience Hub approach for addressing mental health of health and social care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods evaluation.应对 COVID-19 大流行期间卫生和社会保健工作者心理健康问题的韧性中心方法:一项混合方法评估。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Sep;12(29):1-164. doi: 10.3310/HGQR5133.
6
Improving support and planning ahead for older people with learning disabilities and family carers: a mixed-methods study.改善对有学习障碍的老年人及其家庭照顾者的支持与提前规划:一项混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jun;12(16):1-161. doi: 10.3310/MTHW2644.
7
Understanding what affects psychological morbidity in informal carers when providing care at home for patients at the end of life: a systematic qualitative evidence synthesis.了解在家中为临终患者提供护理时,哪些因素会影响非正式护理人员的心理发病率:一项系统的定性证据综合分析。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Sep;13(8):1-53. doi: 10.3310/PYTR4127.
8
Caregivers' willingness to pay for digital support services: Comparative survey.护理人员为数字支持服务付费的意愿:比较调查。
Health Policy. 2023 Apr;130:104751. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104751. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
9
Understanding and addressing factors affecting carers' mental health during end-of-life caregiving: synopsis of meta synthesis of literature and stakeholder collaboration.理解并应对临终护理期间影响照料者心理健康的因素:文献综合分析与利益相关者合作概述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Feb;13(8):1-27. doi: 10.3310/RTHW8493.
10
What factors are associated with informal carers' psychological morbidity during end-of-life home care? A systematic review and thematic synthesis of observational quantitative studies.在临终家庭护理期间,哪些因素与非正式护理人员的心理发病率相关?一项观察性定量研究的系统评价和主题综合分析。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Nov;13(8):1-70. doi: 10.3310/HTJY8442.

本文引用的文献

1
Digital interventions for people with dementia and carers: effective, cost-effective and equitable?针对痴呆症患者及其照料者的数字干预措施:有效、具有成本效益且公平吗?
Neurodegener Dis Manag. 2022 Oct;12(5):215-219. doi: 10.2217/nmt-2022-0025. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
2
mHealth Interventions to Support Caregivers of Older Adults: Equity-Focused Systematic Review.支持老年人照料者的移动健康干预措施:以公平为重点的系统评价。
JMIR Aging. 2022 Jul 8;5(3):e33085. doi: 10.2196/33085.
3
Perceived Acceptability and Experiences of a Digital Psychoeducation and Peer Support Intervention (COPe-support): Interview Study With Carers Supporting Individuals With Psychosis.
数字心理教育和同伴支持干预(COPe-support)的可接受性和体验:对支持精神病患者的照顾者的访谈研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Feb 2;24(2):e27781. doi: 10.2196/27781.
4
Perceptions of Digital Technology Experiences and Development Among Family Caregivers and Technology Researchers: Qualitative Study.家庭照顾者与技术研究人员对数字技术体验及发展的认知:定性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jan 28;6(1):e19967. doi: 10.2196/19967.
5
Informing the Future of Integrated Digital and Clinical Mental Health Care: Synthesis of the Outcomes From Project Synergy.为综合数字与临床心理健康护理的未来提供信息:协同项目成果综述
JMIR Ment Health. 2022 Mar 9;9(3):e33060. doi: 10.2196/33060.
6
Digital personal assistants are smart ways for assistive technology to aid the health and wellbeing of patients and carers.数字个人助理是辅助技术帮助患者和护理人员健康和幸福的一种智能方式。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Nov 15;21(1):643. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02436-y.
7
Factors Influencing Implementation of eHealth Technologies to Support Informal Dementia Care: Umbrella Review.影响电子健康技术支持非正式痴呆症护理实施的因素:综合综述
JMIR Aging. 2021 Oct 8;4(4):e30841. doi: 10.2196/30841.
8
Volunteers' Support of Carers of Rural People Living with Dementia to Use a Custom-Built Application.志愿者支持农村痴呆症患者照顾者使用定制应用程序。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 20;18(18):9909. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18189909.
9
An Introduction to the Main Types of Economic Evaluations Used for Informing Priority Setting and Resource Allocation in Healthcare: Key Features, Uses, and Limitations.用于为医疗保健中的优先事项设定和资源分配提供信息的主要类型经济评估简介:主要特点、用途和局限性。
Front Public Health. 2021 Aug 25;9:722927. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.722927. eCollection 2021.
10
Digital Technology, Health and Well-Being and the Covid-19 Pandemic: It's Time to Call Forward Informal Carers from the Back of the Queue.数字技术、健康与福祉以及新冠疫情:是时候让非正式护工从队列末尾走到前台了。
Semin Oncol Nurs. 2020 Dec;36(6):151088. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2020.151088. Epub 2020 Oct 15.