• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新生儿学和儿科学中的关键决策:I-P-O 框架。

Critical decision-making in neonatology and pediatrics: the I-P-O framework.

机构信息

Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.

Yale New Haven Children's Hospital, New Haven, CT, USA.

出版信息

J Perinatol. 2021 Jan;41(1):173-178. doi: 10.1038/s41372-020-00841-6. Epub 2020 Sep 30.

DOI:10.1038/s41372-020-00841-6
PMID:32999448
Abstract

Critical decision-making in neonatology and other areas of pediatrics often carries with it a complex and difficult ethical component. For any treatment under consideration, the impermissible-permissible-obligatory (I-P-O) spectrum provides a useful framework for determining how to proceed. Any proposed treatment can be located along this spectrum, and identified as either ethically impermissible, permissible, or obligatory. Treatments determined to be ethically impermissible should not be made available by physicians. Those deemed ethically permissible should be explained to parents, commonly with a specific recommendation. Informed parents should then be free to choose from among permissible options. Potential treatments deemed ethically obligatory should be provided to the patient, even in the face of parental objection. The fundamental ethical work in neonatology and pediatrics is determining where on the I-P-O spectrum a treatment under consideration should be located. This should be determined by the prognosis for the patient with and without the treatment, the feasibility of providing the treatment, and consideration of all relevant rights and obligations. Location on the line is dynamic, and clinicians should be open to movement of a given treatment along the spectrum as new information, particularly regarding effectiveness, toxicity, and/or alternatives, becomes available. This framework provides a structure for ethical conversation and decision-making related to a specific patient, as well as in the formation of institutional and national guidelines.

摘要

新生儿学和儿科学等领域的关键决策通常带有复杂且困难的伦理因素。对于任何考虑中的治疗,允许-禁止-义务(I-P-O)频谱为确定如何进行提供了一个有用的框架。任何拟议的治疗都可以沿着这个频谱定位,并确定为伦理上不允许、允许或义务。被认为在伦理上不允许的治疗不应由医生提供。那些被认为在伦理上允许的治疗应该向家长解释,通常伴有具体的建议。知情的家长应该可以在允许的选择中自由选择。被认为在伦理上义务的潜在治疗应该提供给患者,即使面对家长的反对。新生儿学和儿科学中的基本伦理工作是确定考虑中的治疗在 I-P-O 频谱上的位置。这应该根据治疗前后患者的预后、提供治疗的可行性以及对所有相关权利和义务的考虑来确定。位置是动态的,随着有关有效性、毒性和/或替代方案的新信息的出现,临床医生应该对特定治疗沿着该谱的移动持开放态度。该框架为与特定患者相关的伦理对话和决策提供了结构,也为机构和国家指南的制定提供了结构。

相似文献

1
Critical decision-making in neonatology and pediatrics: the I-P-O framework.新生儿学和儿科学中的关键决策:I-P-O 框架。
J Perinatol. 2021 Jan;41(1):173-178. doi: 10.1038/s41372-020-00841-6. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
2
Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.“婴儿多伊”事件重演?美国卫生与公众服务部及2002年《出生时存活婴儿保护法》:关于规范新生儿医疗行为的警示
Pediatrics. 2005 Oct;116(4):e576-85. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1590.
3
Navigating parental disagreement: ethical analysis and a proposed approach.应对父母的分歧:伦理分析与一种建议方法
J Perinatol. 2025 Jul;45(7):1017-1022. doi: 10.1038/s41372-024-02152-6. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
4
Postponed Withholding: Balanced Decision-Making at the Margins of Viability.延迟扣留:在生存边缘的平衡决策。
Am J Bioeth. 2022 Nov;22(11):15-26. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2021.1925777. Epub 2021 May 17.
5
Ethics of emerging technologies and their transition to accepted practice: intestinal transplant for short bowel syndrome.新兴技术的伦理及其向被接受的实践的转变:短肠综合征的肠道移植。
J Perinatol. 2012 Oct;32(10):752-6. doi: 10.1038/jp.2012.69.
6
Gain-of-Function Research: Ethical Analysis.功能获得性研究:伦理分析。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Aug;22(4):923-964. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9810-1. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
7
The role of parents in end-of-life decisions in neonatology: physicians' views and practices.父母在新生儿科临终决策中的作用:医生的观点与实践
Pediatrics. 1998 Mar;101(3 Pt 1):413-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.101.3.413.
8
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.人类健康与环境风险的风险管理框架。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608.
9
Uninformed Origins: Should We Be Advising Parents on the Source of Medicines and Therapies?盲目起源:我们是否应该就药物和疗法的来源向家长提供建议?
Health Care Anal. 2023 Dec;31(3-4):186-195. doi: 10.1007/s10728-023-00458-8. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
10
Child and Parental Perspectives on Communication and Decision Making in Pediatric CKD: A Focus Group Study.儿童和家长对小儿慢性肾脏病沟通和决策的观点:一项焦点小组研究。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2018 Oct;72(4):547-559. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.05.005. Epub 2018 Jul 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Towards better enrollment decision-making for perinatal clinical research: Reconsidering recruitment and consent processes to support family values and preferences.迈向更好的围产期临床研究入组决策:重新审视招募和同意程序以支持家庭价值观和偏好。
Semin Perinatol. 2025 Apr;49(3):152055. doi: 10.1016/j.semperi.2025.152055. Epub 2025 May 21.
2
Ethical Dilemmas in Newborn Infants with Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy.新生儿缺氧缺血性脑病中的伦理困境
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2025 Feb 26;17(2):237-249. doi: 10.1007/s41649-024-00337-x. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Emerging Priorities in Asian Paediatric Ethics.
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2025 Apr 2;17(2):227-230. doi: 10.1007/s41649-025-00367-z. eCollection 2025 Apr.
4
Do Treatment Choices by Artificial Intelligence Correspond to Reality? Retrospective Comparative Research with Necrotizing Enterocolitis as a Use Case.人工智能做出的治疗选择与实际情况相符吗?以坏死性小肠结肠炎为例的回顾性比较研究。
Med Decis Making. 2025 May;45(4):449-461. doi: 10.1177/0272989X251324530. Epub 2025 Mar 12.
5
Navigating parental disagreement: ethical analysis and a proposed approach.应对父母的分歧:伦理分析与一种建议方法
J Perinatol. 2025 Jul;45(7):1017-1022. doi: 10.1038/s41372-024-02152-6. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
6
Ethical and Legal Issues Surrounding Genetic Testing in the NICU.新生儿重症监护病房中遗传检测的伦理和法律问题。
Neoreviews. 2024 Mar 1;25(3):e127-e138. doi: 10.1542/neo.25-3-e127.
7
Navigating the post-Dobbs landscape: ethical considerations from a perinatal perspective.在多布斯案之后的时代中航行:围产期视角下的伦理思考。
J Perinatol. 2024 May;44(5):628-634. doi: 10.1038/s41372-024-01884-9. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
8
The past, current, and future of neonatal intensive care units with artificial intelligence: a systematic review.人工智能在新生儿重症监护病房的过去、现状与未来:一项系统综述
NPJ Digit Med. 2023 Nov 27;6(1):220. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00941-5.
9
Perinatal palliative care in sub-Saharan Africa: recommendations for practice, future research, and guideline development.撒哈拉以南非洲地区的围产期姑息治疗:实践建议、未来研究及指南制定
Front Pediatr. 2023 Jun 26;11:1217209. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1217209. eCollection 2023.
10
The patient/physician relationship in a post-Roe world: a neonatologist viewpoint.后罗诉韦德案时代的医患关系:新生儿科医生的观点。
J Perinatol. 2023 Jul;43(7):968-972. doi: 10.1038/s41372-022-01583-3. Epub 2022 Dec 17.