• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

迈向更好的围产期临床研究入组决策:重新审视招募和同意程序以支持家庭价值观和偏好。

Towards better enrollment decision-making for perinatal clinical research: Reconsidering recruitment and consent processes to support family values and preferences.

作者信息

Weiss Elliott Mark, Wilfond Benjamin S, Kraft Stephanie A

机构信息

Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics and Palliative Care, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.

Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics and Palliative Care, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

Semin Perinatol. 2025 Apr;49(3):152055. doi: 10.1016/j.semperi.2025.152055. Epub 2025 May 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.semperi.2025.152055
PMID:40404236
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12407186/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Whether to participate in clinical research is a special type of decision for parents with infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Parents often report negative experiences being approached for NICU research and researchers struggle to enroll a representative sample. We consider how enrollment decision-making might be better supported by integrating learnings from clinical decision-making.

FINDING

Approaches to supporting decision-making about clinical research, though distinct from those for clinical decision-making, share many similarities. We consider ways researchers may incorporate advances in knowledge about clinical decision-making to: (a) improve documents used for regulatory purposes (e.g., consent forms), and (b) better support relationship building between researchers and parents considering research enrollment.

CONCLUSION

Researchers may benefit from considering approaches to enrollment decision-making that draw on clinical decision-making methods. Future work should assess the impact of such approaches on parental experiences of recruitment; enrollment and retention rates; and representative inclusion of NICU populations.

摘要

目的

对于新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)中有婴儿的父母来说,是否参与临床研究是一种特殊类型的决策。父母经常报告在被邀请参与NICU研究时有着负面经历,并且研究人员难以招募到具有代表性的样本。我们思考如何通过整合临床决策的经验教训来更好地支持入组决策。

研究结果

支持临床研究决策的方法虽然与临床决策方法不同,但有许多相似之处。我们思考研究人员可以如何将临床决策知识的进展纳入其中,以:(a)改进用于监管目的的文件(如同意书);以及(b)更好地支持研究人员与考虑参与研究入组的父母之间建立关系。

结论

研究人员可能会从考虑借鉴临床决策方法的入组决策方法中受益。未来的工作应评估此类方法对父母招募体验、入组率和留存率以及NICU人群代表性纳入的影响。

相似文献

1
Towards better enrollment decision-making for perinatal clinical research: Reconsidering recruitment and consent processes to support family values and preferences.迈向更好的围产期临床研究入组决策:重新审视招募和同意程序以支持家庭价值观和偏好。
Semin Perinatol. 2025 Apr;49(3):152055. doi: 10.1016/j.semperi.2025.152055. Epub 2025 May 21.
2
Parents' experiences of psychotherapeutic support on the neonatal unit: A mixed methods systematic review to inform intervention development for a multicultural population.父母在新生儿病房接受心理治疗支持的经历:一项混合方法的系统评价,为多元文化人群的干预发展提供信息。
Nurs Crit Care. 2025 May;30(3):e13194. doi: 10.1111/nicc.13194. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
3
Developing evidence-based guidelines for describing potential benefits and harms within patient information leaflets/sheets (PILs) that inform and do not cause harm (PrinciPILs).制定基于证据的指南,用于在患者信息单页/说明书(PrinciPILs)中描述潜在益处和危害,这些信息单页既能提供信息又不会造成伤害。
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Aug;29(43):1-20. doi: 10.3310/GJJH2402.
4
The ethical issues regarding consent to clinical trials with pre-term or sick neonates: a systematic review (framework synthesis) of the analytical (theoretical/philosophical) research.关于早产儿或患病新生儿临床试验同意书的伦理问题:一项分析性(理论/哲学)研究的系统综述(框架综合)
Trials. 2016 Sep 9;17(1):443. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1562-3.
5
Ethical issues in vaccine trial participation by adolescents: qualitative insights on family decision making from a human papillomavirus vaccine trial in Tanzania.青少年参与疫苗试验中的伦理问题:来自坦桑尼亚人乳头瘤病毒疫苗试验的家庭决策的定性见解。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Nov 20;25(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01122-z.
6
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.干预健康从业者与受影响者之间关于临终关怀的人际沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
7
Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.我们能否加强髋臼周围截骨术的共同决策?一项关于患者体验的定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):120-136. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003198. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
8
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
9
Decision aids for people considering taking part in clinical trials.为考虑参与临床试验的人群提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 27;2015(11):CD009736. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009736.pub2.
10
Audio-visual presentation of information for informed consent for participation in clinical trials.用于参与临床试验知情同意的信息视听展示。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23(1):CD003717. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003717.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Eligible Infants Included in Neonatal Clinical Trials and Reasons for Noninclusion: A Systematic Review.纳入新生儿临床试验的合格婴儿及未纳入原因:系统评价。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 1;7(10):e2441372. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.41372.
2
Development of the Better Research Interactions for Every Family (BRIEF) intervention to support recruitment for neonatal clinical trials: an intervention mapping guided approach.为支持新生儿临床试验招募而开发更好的家庭研究互动(BRIEF)干预措施:一项基于干预映射的方法。
Trials. 2024 Sep 12;25(1):610. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08446-6.
3
Motivations for and against Participation in Neonatal Research: Insights from Interviews of Diverse Parents Approached for Neonatal Research in the United States.参与新生儿研究的动机和顾虑:对美国被邀请参与新生儿研究的不同父母的访谈洞察。
J Pediatr. 2024 Dec;275:113923. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2024.113923. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
4
Race and Ethnicity of Infants Enrolled in Neonatal Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review.种族和民族的婴儿参加新生儿临床试验:系统评价。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Dec 1;6(12):e2348882. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.48882.
5
Experiences and preferences for learning about neonatal research: insights from parent interviews.关于新生儿研究学习的经历与偏好:来自家长访谈的见解
J Perinatol. 2024 Mar;44(3):404-414. doi: 10.1038/s41372-023-01790-6. Epub 2023 Nov 25.
6
Shared Decision-Making in Pediatrics.儿科中的共享决策。
Pediatr Clin North Am. 2024 Feb;71(1):39-48. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2023.08.001. Epub 2023 Sep 15.
7
Umbilical Cord Milking Versus Delayed Cord Clamping in Infants 28 to 32 Weeks: A Randomized Trial.《28 至 32 周龄婴儿脐带血采集与延迟断脐的随机对照试验》。
Pediatrics. 2023 Dec 1;152(6). doi: 10.1542/peds.2023-063113.
8
Informed Consent among Clinical Trial Participants with Different Cancer Diagnoses.不同癌症诊断的临床试验参与者的知情同意。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2024 Jul-Sep;15(3):165-177. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2023.2262992. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
9
Patient priorities for fulfilling the principle of respect in research: findings from a modified Delphi study.患者对研究中尊重原则的优先考量:一项经改良德尔菲研究的结果。
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Sep 21;24(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00954-5.
10
Pediatric Decision Making: Consensus Recommendations.儿科决策制定:共识建议。
Pediatrics. 2023 Sep 1;152(3). doi: 10.1542/peds.2023-061832.