Suppr超能文献

迈向更好的围产期临床研究入组决策:重新审视招募和同意程序以支持家庭价值观和偏好。

Towards better enrollment decision-making for perinatal clinical research: Reconsidering recruitment and consent processes to support family values and preferences.

作者信息

Weiss Elliott Mark, Wilfond Benjamin S, Kraft Stephanie A

机构信息

Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics and Palliative Care, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.

Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics and Palliative Care, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

Semin Perinatol. 2025 Apr;49(3):152055. doi: 10.1016/j.semperi.2025.152055. Epub 2025 May 21.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Whether to participate in clinical research is a special type of decision for parents with infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Parents often report negative experiences being approached for NICU research and researchers struggle to enroll a representative sample. We consider how enrollment decision-making might be better supported by integrating learnings from clinical decision-making.

FINDING

Approaches to supporting decision-making about clinical research, though distinct from those for clinical decision-making, share many similarities. We consider ways researchers may incorporate advances in knowledge about clinical decision-making to: (a) improve documents used for regulatory purposes (e.g., consent forms), and (b) better support relationship building between researchers and parents considering research enrollment.

CONCLUSION

Researchers may benefit from considering approaches to enrollment decision-making that draw on clinical decision-making methods. Future work should assess the impact of such approaches on parental experiences of recruitment; enrollment and retention rates; and representative inclusion of NICU populations.

摘要

目的

对于新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)中有婴儿的父母来说,是否参与临床研究是一种特殊类型的决策。父母经常报告在被邀请参与NICU研究时有着负面经历,并且研究人员难以招募到具有代表性的样本。我们思考如何通过整合临床决策的经验教训来更好地支持入组决策。

研究结果

支持临床研究决策的方法虽然与临床决策方法不同,但有许多相似之处。我们思考研究人员可以如何将临床决策知识的进展纳入其中,以:(a)改进用于监管目的的文件(如同意书);以及(b)更好地支持研究人员与考虑参与研究入组的父母之间建立关系。

结论

研究人员可能会从考虑借鉴临床决策方法的入组决策方法中受益。未来的工作应评估此类方法对父母招募体验、入组率和留存率以及NICU人群代表性纳入的影响。

相似文献

9
Decision aids for people considering taking part in clinical trials.为考虑参与临床试验的人群提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 27;2015(11):CD009736. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009736.pub2.

本文引用的文献

6
Shared Decision-Making in Pediatrics.儿科中的共享决策。
Pediatr Clin North Am. 2024 Feb;71(1):39-48. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2023.08.001. Epub 2023 Sep 15.
8
Informed Consent among Clinical Trial Participants with Different Cancer Diagnoses.不同癌症诊断的临床试验参与者的知情同意。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2024 Jul-Sep;15(3):165-177. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2023.2262992. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
10
Pediatric Decision Making: Consensus Recommendations.儿科决策制定:共识建议。
Pediatrics. 2023 Sep 1;152(3). doi: 10.1542/peds.2023-061832.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验