Lefevor G Tyler, Sprague Brianna M, Boyd-Rogers Caroline C, Smack Abigail C P
Department of Psychology, Rhodes College, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Int J Transgend. 2018 Apr 25;20(1):39-48. doi: 10.1080/15532739.2018.1452172. eCollection 2019.
Transgender and gender nonconforming (TGNC) individuals experience an increased prevalence of many psychological disorders, leading many to reach out for support from family, friends, mental health professionals, and religious or community networks. Nonetheless, experiences seeking support are often negative, and many psychotherapists report feeling underprepared to work with TGNC clients. To better understand the experiences of TGNC individuals and better equip psychotherapists in their work with TGNC clients, we investigate which sources of support most successfully buffer psychological distress among TGNC individuals. This study aims to identify differences in levels of various types of support (social, family, religious, and living-situation) between cisgender and TGNC individuals and examine how these types of support may or may not buffer psychological distress among TGNC individuals. We used a United States national sample of 3,090 students (1,030 cisgender men; 1,030 cisgender women; 349 transgender; 681 endorsing another gender identity) from the Center for Collegiate Mental Health 2012-2015 database which provided basic demographic information through the Standardized Data Set. Psychological distress was measured through the Counseling Center Assessment of Psychological Symptoms 34-item questionnaire. TGNC individuals reported more distress, less family support, more social support, and less frequent religious affiliation than cisgender men and women. Family and social support emerged as the strongest predictors of distress for both TGNC and cisgender individuals. Though religious affiliation and living on-campus buffered distress among cisgender students, they did not buffer distress among TGNC students. Our study highlights disparities in distress and support between TGNC and cisgender individuals. We found that although religious affiliation and on-campus living are beneficial for cisgender students, neither systematically buffers distress for TGNC students. These findings illustrate the impact minority stress and systemic discrimination may have on TGNC individuals and provide suggestions for therapeutic intervention in work with TGNC individuals.
跨性别和性别不一致(TGNC)个体患多种心理障碍的患病率更高,这使得许多人向家人、朋友、心理健康专业人士以及宗教或社区网络寻求支持。尽管如此,寻求支持的经历往往是负面的,许多心理治疗师表示,他们觉得在与TGNC客户合作时准备不足。为了更好地了解TGNC个体的经历,并让心理治疗师在与TGNC客户合作时具备更好的能力,我们调查了哪些支持来源能最有效地缓解TGNC个体的心理困扰。本研究旨在确定顺性别个体和TGNC个体在各种类型的支持(社会、家庭、宗教和生活状况)水平上的差异,并研究这些类型的支持如何可能缓冲或无法缓冲TGNC个体的心理困扰。我们使用了来自大学心理健康中心2012 - 2015年数据库的3090名美国学生的全国样本(1030名顺性别男性;1030名顺性别女性;