Merchant Roland C, Marks Sarah J, Clark Melissa A, Carey Michael P, Liu Tao
Department of Emergency Medicine Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts.
Department of Health Services Policy and Practice School of Public Health and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Alpert Medical School Brown University Providence Rhode Island.
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2020 Mar 20;1(3):202-213. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12024. eCollection 2020 Jun.
We sought to determine if a pictorial brochure improves HIV/AIDS and HIV testing knowledge and increases HIV testing motivation and behavioral skills as well as a video among adult emergency department patients, regardless of language spoken and health literacy level.
ED patients were stratified by primary language spoken (English or Spanish) and health literacy level (lower or higher) and randomly assigned to watch the study video or review the content-matched pictorial brochure. HIV/AIDS and HIV testing knowledge, motivation for HIV testing, and behavioral skills for HIV testing were assessed using study instruments before and after watching the video or reviewing the pictorial brochure.
Of the 712 English- and 655 Spanish-speaking ED patients, HIV/AIDS and HIV testing knowledge improved more among participants in the video than the pictorial brochure arm (∆ 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.07, 0.79). This improvement was more pronounced among those with lower (∆ 0.60; 95% CI: 0.06, 1.13) than higher health literacy (∆ 0.27; 95% CI: -0.22, 0.76). HIV testing motivation was high before the intervention and did not increase differentially between arms. Confidence in recognizing when to be tested for HIV was slightly greater in the video than pictorial brochure arm (∆ 0.15; 95% CI: 0.01, 0.28), but did not differ by language spoken or health literacy level.
A video improved HIV/AIDS and HIV testing knowledge slightly more than a pictorial brochure. Other considerations (eg, patient volume, staffing, space, and video access) should guide EDs on how best to provide information about HIV testing to ED patients.
我们试图确定一份图文宣传册是否能提高成年急诊科患者对艾滋病毒/艾滋病及艾滋病毒检测的认识,增强其进行艾滋病毒检测的动机和行为技能,以及一部视频是否也有同样效果,且不受患者所讲语言和健康素养水平的影响。
急诊科患者按主要所讲语言(英语或西班牙语)和健康素养水平(较低或较高)进行分层,然后随机分配观看研究视频或阅读内容匹配的图文宣传册。在观看视频或阅读图文宣传册前后,使用研究工具评估患者对艾滋病毒/艾滋病及艾滋病毒检测的认识、进行艾滋病毒检测的动机以及艾滋病毒检测的行为技能。
在712名讲英语和655名讲西班牙语的急诊科患者中,观看视频的参与者对艾滋病毒/艾滋病及艾滋病毒检测知识的提高程度高于阅读图文宣传册的参与者(差异为0.43;95%置信区间[CI]:0.07,0.79)。这种提高在健康素养较低的患者中更为明显(差异为0.60;95%CI:0.06,1.13),而在健康素养较高的患者中差异为0.27(95%CI:-0.22,0.76)。干预前进行艾滋病毒检测的动机就很高,两组之间没有差异。在识别何时进行艾滋病毒检测方面,观看视频的患者比阅读图文宣传册的患者信心稍高(差异为0.15;95%CI:0.01,0.28),但不受所讲语言或健康素养水平的影响。
视频在提高艾滋病毒/艾滋病及艾滋病毒检测知识方面比图文宣传册略胜一筹。其他因素(如患者数量、人员配备、空间和视频获取情况)应指导急诊科如何以最佳方式向急诊科患者提供有关艾滋病毒检测的信息。