Calderon Yvette, Leider Jason, Hailpern Susan, Haughey Marianne, Ghosh Reena, Lombardi Pamela, Bijur Polly, Bauman Laurie
Jacobi Medical Center, Bronx, New York, USA.
Sex Transm Dis. 2009 Apr;36(4):207-10. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e318191ba3f.
Many of the individuals most at risk for HIV infection (i.e., minority populations, women, adolescents) are also the most marginalized by our health care system. Lacking primary care providers, they rely on the Emergency Department (ED) for their health care needs and education. In this prospective randomized controlled trial, we compared the educational effectiveness of a 15-minute posttest counseling video with the normal practice of a session with an HIV counselor. The study population was composed of ambulatory patients recruited for rapid HIV testing in the ED.
The RAs (research assistants) recruited a convenience sample of stable patients presenting to the walk-in section of an inner-city adult ED for rapid HIV testing. Eligible patients for this study included patients who consented for the rapid HIV test and completed measures on condom intention and condom use self-efficacy. Before receiving their results, participants who consented to be in this study were randomized to either a 15-minute HIV posttest educational video available in English/Spanish or to a posttest educational session with an HIV counselor. Afterwards, both groups completed an assessment tool concerning HIV prevention and transmission.
Of the 128 participants, 61 and 67 patients were randomized to the video and counselor groups, respectively. The groups were similar with respect to gender, ethnicity and experience with prior HIV testing. Mean knowledge scores were higher in the video group (76.20% vs. 69.3%; 90% CI for the difference, 2.8, 11.2). As the lower bound of the CI for the difference was higher than the lower equivalence boundary (-5%), we infer that the video was at least as effective as the counselor educational session.
The use of an educational counseling video is a valid alternative for providing posttest education and prevention information during the waiting period associated with the 20-minute HIV rapid test. Without disruption in clinical flow, both testing and education can be accomplished in a meaningful way in a busy ED.
许多最易感染艾滋病毒的人群(即少数族裔、女性、青少年)在我们的医疗保健系统中也处于最边缘化的地位。由于缺乏初级保健提供者,他们依靠急诊科来满足其医疗保健需求和接受教育。在这项前瞻性随机对照试验中,我们将一段15分钟的检测后咨询视频的教育效果与由艾滋病毒咨询师进行一次咨询的常规做法进行了比较。研究人群由在急诊科接受快速艾滋病毒检测的门诊患者组成。
研究助理招募了一个便利样本,这些稳定患者到市中心一家成人急诊科的免预约区进行快速艾滋病毒检测。本研究的合格患者包括同意进行快速艾滋病毒检测并完成避孕套使用意愿和避孕套使用自我效能测量的患者。在收到检测结果之前,同意参与本研究的参与者被随机分为观看15分钟英语/西班牙语版艾滋病毒检测后教育视频组或与艾滋病毒咨询师进行检测后教育咨询组。之后,两组都完成了一份关于艾滋病毒预防和传播的评估工具。
在128名参与者中,分别有61名和67名患者被随机分配到视频组和咨询师组。两组在性别、种族和既往艾滋病毒检测经历方面相似。视频组的平均知识得分更高(76.20%对69.3%;差异的90%置信区间为2.8至11.2)。由于差异置信区间的下限高于等效性下限(-5%),我们推断视频至少与咨询师教育咨询一样有效。
在与20分钟艾滋病毒快速检测相关的等待期内,使用教育咨询视频是提供检测后教育和预防信息的一种有效替代方式。在繁忙的急诊科中,无需中断临床流程,检测和教育都可以以有意义的方式完成。