Suppr超能文献

评估苏黎世间歇性跛行问卷在腰椎管狭窄症患者中的最小临床重要差异。

Evaluation of the Minimum Clinically Important Differences of the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

机构信息

Inanami Spine and Joint Hospital.

Department of Medical Research and Management for Musculoskeletal Pain, 22nd Century Medical & Research Center, Faculty of Medicine.

出版信息

Clin Spine Surg. 2020 Dec;33(10):E499-E503. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000983.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

A case-control study.

OBJECT

This study aimed to evaluate the minimally clinically important differences (MCIDs) of the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) after microendoscopic laminectomy in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The ZCQ is a self-administered tool used to evaluate symptom severity and physical function in patients with LSS. It has been used in many studies worldwide. However, the MCIDs of the ZCQ have not yet been determined.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study sample consisted of 514 patients who underwent microendoscopic laminectomy for LSS at our hospital between March 2012 and May 2014. The ZCQ, which includes 7 items for symptom severity (scored from 1 to 5) and 5 items for functional disability (scored from 1 to 4), was administered preoperatively and 1-year postoperatively. The MCID was calculated by 4 approaches, including average change, minimum detectable change, change difference, and receiver operating characteristic curve. The authors calculated the area under the curve (AUC) to evaluate the accuracy of the receiver operating characteristic curve. The responsiveness of each measurement was then analyzed.

RESULTS

The authors were able to administer the ZCQ at 1-year postoperatively in 349 patients. The ZCQ score was statistically significantly improved 1-year postoperatively. The MCID of ZCQ for symptom severity varied from 0.75 to 0.84, whereas the MCID of the ZCQ score for functional disability varied from 0.60 to 0.76. The AUC of the ZCQ for symptom severity was 0.81 and that for functional disability was 0.80.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that the MCID of the ZCQ for symptom severity varied from 0.75 to 0.84 and the MCID for functional disability varied from 0.60 to 0.76. In addition, each AUC was over 0.80, indicating that MCIDs of the ZCQ were found to have a high diagnostic performance.

摘要

研究设计

病例对照研究。

目的

本研究旨在评估腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)患者行微创内镜椎板切除术(microendoscopic laminectomy)后苏黎世跛行问卷(Zurich Claudication Questionnaire,ZCQ)的最小临床重要差异(minimally clinically important differences,MCIDs)。

背景资料概要

ZCQ 是一种自我管理工具,用于评估 LSS 患者的症状严重程度和身体功能。它已在全球许多研究中使用。然而,ZCQ 的 MCIDs 尚未确定。

材料和方法

研究样本包括 2012 年 3 月至 2014 年 5 月在我院接受微创内镜椎板切除术治疗的 514 例 LSS 患者。ZCQ 包括 7 项症状严重程度项目(评分范围为 1 至 5)和 5 项功能障碍项目(评分范围为 1 至 4),于术前和术后 1 年进行评估。通过 4 种方法计算 MCID,包括平均变化、最小可检测变化、变化差异和受试者工作特征曲线。作者计算了曲线下面积(area under the curve,AUC)以评估受试者工作特征曲线的准确性。然后分析了每种测量的反应性。

结果

作者能够在 349 例患者中在术后 1 年进行 ZCQ 评估。术后 1 年 ZCQ 评分有统计学显著改善。ZCQ 症状严重程度的 MCID 范围为 0.75 至 0.84,而功能障碍的 MCID 范围为 0.60 至 0.76。ZCQ 症状严重程度的 AUC 为 0.81,功能障碍的 AUC 为 0.80。

结论

本研究表明,ZCQ 症状严重程度的 MCID 范围为 0.75 至 0.84,功能障碍的 MCID 范围为 0.60 至 0.76。此外,每个 AUC 均大于 0.80,表明 ZCQ 的 MCIDs 具有较高的诊断性能。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验