Suppr超能文献

苏黎世间歇性跛行问卷和日本矫形协会评分在腰椎管狭窄症患者中提示运动综合征的临界截断点。

The critical cutoff point of the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score indicating locomotive syndrome in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saiseikai Tondabayashi Hospital, 1-3-36 Koyodai Tondabayashi City, Osaka, 5840082, Japan.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho Kashihara City, Nara, 6348522, Japan.

出版信息

J Orthop Sci. 2021 Mar;26(2):290-294. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2020.02.019. Epub 2020 Apr 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Locomotive syndrome (LS) is a condition of decreased mobility caused by disorders of the locomotive organs. Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a LS disorder. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association score (JOA score) and the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) are international evaluation tools for LSS. However, the relationship between LS and JOA score or ZCQ is unknown. This study aimed to clarify the correlations between LS progression and the values/parameters of the JOA score or ZCQ and to determine the critical cutoff point of the JOA score or ZCQ that indicates LS progression.

METHODS

We recruited preoperative LSS patients (n = 82). Patients' mean age was 73.4 years. The study participants were evaluated using the 25-question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale (GLFS), JOA score, and ZCQ (which consists of symptom severity and physical function), and the patients' health-related quality of life was assessed using EuroQoL-5 dimension (EQ-5D) utility values and the EuroQoL-visual analog scale (EQ-VAS). We investigated the correlations between the 25-question GLFS and each clinical variable and evaluated the critical cutoff point of each international evaluation tool to detect LS.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant correlation between 25-question GLFS and each clinical evaluation tool. LSS patients with LS showed significantly worse scores in the evaluation tools than LSS patients without LS. Moreover, we found that critical cutoff points of 17.5 on JOA score, 3.1 on ZCQ-symptom, and 2.3 on ZCQ-function could detect LS.

CONCLUSIONS

A statistically significant correlation exists between the 25-question GLFS and the JOA score or ZCQ. It might be important to perform decompression surgery for LSS patients before they reach the cutoff values of the several clinical evaluation tools to avoid LS progression.

STUDY DESIGN

Clinical prospective case-control study.

摘要

背景

运动器官障碍导致的活动能力降低即为运动系统综合征(LS)。腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)是 LS 疾病之一。日本骨科协会评分(JOA 评分)和苏黎世跛行问卷(ZCQ)是 LSS 的国际评估工具。然而,LS 与 JOA 评分或 ZCQ 之间的关系尚不清楚。本研究旨在阐明 LS 进展与 JOA 评分或 ZCQ 的数值/参数之间的相关性,并确定指示 LS 进展的 JOA 评分或 ZCQ 的临界截止值。

方法

我们招募了术前患有 LSS 的患者(n=82)。患者的平均年龄为 73.4 岁。使用 25 题老年活动功能量表(GLFS)、JOA 评分和 ZCQ(包括症状严重程度和身体功能)对研究参与者进行评估,并使用欧洲五维健康量表(EQ-5D)效用值和欧洲五维健康量表视觉模拟量表(EQ-VAS)评估患者的健康相关生活质量。我们研究了 25 题 GLFS 与各临床变量之间的相关性,并评估了每个国际评估工具的临界截止值,以检测 LS。

结果

25 题 GLFS 与各临床评估工具之间存在显著的相关性。患有 LS 的 LSS 患者在评估工具中的得分明显差于不患有 LS 的 LSS 患者。此外,我们发现 JOA 评分 17.5、ZCQ 症状 3.1 和 ZCQ 功能 2.3 是可以检测 LS 的临界截止值。

结论

25 题 GLFS 与 JOA 评分或 ZCQ 之间存在显著的相关性。对于 LSS 患者,在达到几个临床评估工具的截止值之前进行减压手术以避免 LS 进展可能很重要。

研究设计

临床前瞻性病例对照研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验