• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

研究参与者对使用电子门户进行参与和数据收集的看法:一项大型流行病学队列的焦点小组结果。

Research Participants' Perspectives on Using an Electronic Portal for Engagement and Data Collection: Focus Group Results From a Large Epidemiologic Cohort.

机构信息

American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, United States.

Asher Consulting, Atlanta, GA, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 1;22(10):e18556. doi: 10.2196/18556.

DOI:10.2196/18556
PMID:33001033
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7563628/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Epidemiologic cohort studies have begun to leverage electronic research participant portals to facilitate data collection, integrate wearable technologies, lower costs, and engage participants. However, little is known about the acceptability of portal use by research participants.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to conduct focus groups among a sample of Cancer Prevention Study-3 (CPS-3) participants to better understand their preferences and concerns about research portals.

METHODS

CPS-3 participants were stratified based on sex, race and ethnicity, age, and cancer status, and randomly invited to participate. Focus groups used an exploratory case design with semistructured guides to prompt discussion. Using a constant comparison technique, transcripts were assigned codes to identify themes.

RESULTS

Participants (31/59, 52% women; 52/59, 88% White/non-Latinx) were favorably disposed toward using a research participant portal to take surveys, communicate with the study staff, and upload data. Most participants indicated that a portal would be beneficial and convenient but expressed concerns over data safety. Participants stressed the importance of an easy-to-use and trustworthy portal that is compatible with mobile devices.

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to being beneficial to researchers, portals may also benefit participants as long as the portals are secure and simple. Participants believe that portals can provide convenient ways to report data and remain connected to the study.

摘要

背景

流行病学队列研究已经开始利用电子研究参与者门户来促进数据收集、整合可穿戴技术、降低成本和吸引参与者。然而,对于研究参与者对门户使用的可接受性知之甚少。

目的

本研究的目的是在癌症预防研究-3(CPS-3)参与者中进行焦点小组,以更好地了解他们对研究门户的偏好和关注。

方法

根据性别、种族和民族、年龄和癌症状况对 CPS-3 参与者进行分层,并随机邀请他们参加。焦点小组采用探索性案例设计,使用半结构化指南来促进讨论。使用恒定比较技术,将转录本分配给识别主题的代码。

结果

参与者(31/59,52%女性;52/59,88%白人/非拉丁裔)对使用研究参与者门户进行调查、与研究人员沟通和上传数据持有利态度。大多数参与者表示,门户将是有益和方便的,但对数据安全表示担忧。参与者强调了易于使用和值得信赖的门户的重要性,该门户与移动设备兼容。

结论

除了对研究人员有益之外,只要门户安全且简单,门户也可能对参与者有益。参与者认为门户可以提供方便的报告数据和与研究保持联系的方式。

相似文献

1
Research Participants' Perspectives on Using an Electronic Portal for Engagement and Data Collection: Focus Group Results From a Large Epidemiologic Cohort.研究参与者对使用电子门户进行参与和数据收集的看法:一项大型流行病学队列的焦点小组结果。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 1;22(10):e18556. doi: 10.2196/18556.
2
Patient Portals Facilitating Engagement With Inpatient Electronic Medical Records: A Systematic Review.促进住院电子病历参与度的患者门户:一项系统综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Apr 11;21(4):e12779. doi: 10.2196/12779.
3
Patient Portals as a Tool for Health Care Engagement: A Mixed-Method Study of Older Adults With Varying Levels of Health Literacy and Prior Patient Portal Use.患者门户网站作为促进医疗参与的工具:对健康素养水平不同且之前使用过患者门户网站的老年人的一项混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Mar 30;19(3):e99. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7099.
4
Disparities in Electronic Patient Portal Use in Prenatal Care: Retrospective Cohort Study.产前护理中电子患者门户使用情况的差异:回顾性队列研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Sep 23;21(9):e14445. doi: 10.2196/14445.
5
Patient Recommendations to Improve the Implementation of and Engagement With Portals in Acute Care: Hospital-Based Qualitative Study.改善急性护理中门户网站实施与参与度的患者建议:基于医院的定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jan 14;22(1):e13337. doi: 10.2196/13337.
6
New Integrated Model Approach to Understand the Factors That Drive Electronic Health Record Portal Adoption: Cross-Sectional National Survey.理解推动电子健康记录门户采用的因素的新综合模型方法:全国横断面调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Nov 19;20(11):e11032. doi: 10.2196/11032.
7
Using the Technology Acceptance Model to Explore User Experience, Intent to Use, and Use Behavior of a Patient Portal Among Older Adults With Multiple Chronic Conditions: Descriptive Qualitative Study.运用技术接受模型探索患有多种慢性病的老年人对患者门户网站的用户体验、使用意愿和使用行为:描述性定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Apr 8;21(4):e11604. doi: 10.2196/11604.
8
Disparities in Patient-Reported Interest in Web-Based Patient Portals: Survey at an Urban Academic Safety-Net Hospital.患者报告的对基于网络的患者门户的兴趣差异:在一家城市学术安全网医院进行的调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Mar 26;21(3):e11421. doi: 10.2196/11421.
9
An Untapped Potential in Primary Care: Semi-Structured Interviews with Clinicians on How Patient Portals Will Work for Caregivers in the Safety Net.初级保健中的未开发潜力:与临床医生进行半结构化访谈,了解患者门户如何为安全网中的护理人员提供服务。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 20;22(7):e18466. doi: 10.2196/18466.
10
Determinants of Use of the Care Information Exchange Portal: Cross-sectional Study.使用护理信息交换门户的决定因素:横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Nov 11;23(11):e23481. doi: 10.2196/23481.

本文引用的文献

1
Who Isn't Using Patient Portals And Why? Evidence And Implications From A National Sample Of US Adults.谁没有使用患者门户,以及为什么?来自美国成年人全国样本的证据和影响。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Dec;37(12):1948-1954. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05117.
2
Delivery of the research participant perception survey through the patient portal.通过患者门户网站开展研究参与者认知调查。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2018 Jun;2(3):163-168. doi: 10.1017/cts.2018.32. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
3
Systematic review of participants' attitudes towards data sharing: a thematic synthesis.系统综述参与者对数据共享的态度:主题综合分析。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2018 Apr;23(2):123-133. doi: 10.1177/1355819617751555.
4
Telehealth, Mobile Applications, and Wearable Devices are Expanding Cancer Care Beyond Walls.远程医疗、移动应用程序和可穿戴设备正在突破局限,拓展癌症护理。
Semin Oncol Nurs. 2018 May;34(2):118-125. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2018.03.002. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
5
Patient Portal Use and Experience Among Older Adults: Systematic Review.老年人使用患者门户网站的情况与体验:系统评价
JMIR Med Inform. 2017 Oct 16;5(4):e38. doi: 10.2196/medinform.8092.
6
Patient-Perceived Facilitators of and Barriers to Electronic Portal Use: A Systematic Review.患者对电子门户使用的促进因素和障碍:一项系统评价。
Comput Inform Nurs. 2017 Nov;35(11):565-573. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000377.
7
Facilitators and Barriers of Electronic Health Record Patient Portal Adoption by Older Adults: A Literature Study.老年人采用电子健康记录患者门户的促进因素和障碍:一项文献研究
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;235:308-312.
8
Patient portals and broadband internet inequality.患者门户网站与宽带互联网不平等
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Sep 1;24(5):927-932. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx020.
9
Patient Portals as a Tool for Health Care Engagement: A Mixed-Method Study of Older Adults With Varying Levels of Health Literacy and Prior Patient Portal Use.患者门户网站作为促进医疗参与的工具:对健康素养水平不同且之前使用过患者门户网站的老年人的一项混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Mar 30;19(3):e99. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7099.
10
The American Cancer Society's Cancer Prevention Study 3 (CPS-3): Recruitment, study design, and baseline characteristics.美国癌症协会的癌症预防研究3(CPS-3):招募、研究设计及基线特征
Cancer. 2017 Jun 1;123(11):2014-2024. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30561. Epub 2017 Feb 7.