• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者门户网站作为促进医疗参与的工具:对健康素养水平不同且之前使用过患者门户网站的老年人的一项混合方法研究。

Patient Portals as a Tool for Health Care Engagement: A Mixed-Method Study of Older Adults With Varying Levels of Health Literacy and Prior Patient Portal Use.

作者信息

Irizarry Taya, Shoemake Jocelyn, Nilsen Marci Lee, Czaja Sara, Beach Scott, DeVito Dabbs Annette

机构信息

School of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsbrugh, PA, United States.

Department of Psychology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2017 Mar 30;19(3):e99. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7099.

DOI:10.2196/jmir.7099
PMID:28360022
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5391436/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Growing evidence that patient engagement improves health outcomes and reduces health care costs has fueled health providers' focus on patient portals as the primary access point for personal health information and patient-provider communication. Whereas much attention has been given to identifying characteristics of older adults who do and do not adopt patient portals and necessary adaptions to portal design, little is known about their attitudes and perceptions regarding patient portal use as a tool for engagement in their health care within the context of health literacy, experience navigating Web-based health information, and previous patient portal use.

OBJECTIVE

The specific aims of this study were to explore attitudes toward portal adoption and its perceived usefulness as a tool for health care engagement among adults (65 years and older) who have varying levels of health literacy and degrees of prior patient portal use.

METHODS

A phone survey of 100 community dwelling adults gathered sociodemographic, health, and technology related information. Older adults were purposefully selected for 4 follow-up focus groups based on survey responses to health literacy and previous patient portal use. A mixed-method approach was used to integrate phone survey data with thematic analysis of 4 focus groups. Due to variability in attitudes between focus group participants, an individual case analysis was performed and thematic patterns were used as the basis for subgroup formation.

RESULTS

Differences in health literacy, comfort navigating health information on the Web, and previous portal experience explained some but not all differences related to the 7 themes that emerged in the focus groups analysis. Individual cases who shared attitudes were arranged into 5 subgroups from least to most able and willing to engage in health care via a patient portal. The subgroups' overall portal adoption attitudes were: (1) Don't want to feel pushed into anything, (2) Will only adopt if required, (3) Somebody needs to help me, (4) See general convenience of the portal for simple tasks and medical history, but prefer human contact for questions, and (5) Appreciates current features and excited about new possibilities .

CONCLUSIONS

Most of the older adults are interested in using a patient portal regardless of health literacy level, previous patient portal adoption, or experience navigating health information on the Web. Research targeting informal caregivers of older adults who are unable or unwilling to engage with information technology in health care on their own is warranted. Health care organizations should consider tailored strategies to meet the needs of older adults (and their informal caregivers) and explore alternative workflows that integrate patient portal information into phone conversations and face-to-face contact with health care providers.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e19d/5391436/2ff5656d5146/jmir_v19i3e99_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e19d/5391436/2ff5656d5146/jmir_v19i3e99_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e19d/5391436/2ff5656d5146/jmir_v19i3e99_fig1.jpg
摘要

背景

越来越多的证据表明,患者参与可改善健康状况并降低医疗成本,这促使医疗服务提供者将重点放在患者门户网站上,将其作为获取个人健康信息和患者与医疗服务提供者沟通的主要接入点。尽管人们十分关注确定采用和不采用患者门户网站的老年人的特征以及对门户网站设计的必要调整,但对于他们在健康素养、浏览基于网络的健康信息的经验以及之前使用患者门户网站的背景下,对将患者门户网站用作参与自身医疗保健工具的态度和看法却知之甚少。

目的

本研究的具体目标是探讨不同健康素养水平和之前使用患者门户网站程度不同的成年人(65岁及以上)对采用门户网站的态度及其作为医疗保健参与工具的感知有用性。

方法

对100名居住在社区的成年人进行电话调查,收集社会人口统计学、健康和技术相关信息。根据对健康素养和之前使用患者门户网站情况的调查回复,有目的地选择老年人参加4个后续焦点小组。采用混合方法将电话调查数据与对4个焦点小组的主题分析相结合。由于焦点小组参与者之间态度存在差异,进行了个体案例分析,并将主题模式用作形成亚组的基础。

结果

健康素养、在网络上浏览健康信息的舒适度以及之前的门户网站使用经验方面的差异解释了与焦点小组分析中出现的7个主题相关的部分而非全部差异。根据态度将个体案例从最不愿意和最无能力通过患者门户网站参与医疗保健到最愿意和最有能力进行排列,分为5个亚组。各亚组对门户网站采用的总体态度分别为:(1)不想被强迫做任何事,(2)仅在有要求时才会采用,(3)需要有人帮助我,(4)看到门户网站在简单任务和病史方面的一般便利性,但对于问题更喜欢与人接触,以及(5)欣赏当前功能并对新可能性感到兴奋。

结论

大多数老年人对使用患者门户网站感兴趣,无论其健康素养水平、之前是否采用过患者门户网站或在网络上浏览健康信息的经验如何。有必要针对那些无法或不愿意自行参与医疗保健信息技术的老年人的非正式护理人员开展研究。医疗保健组织应考虑制定量身定制的策略,以满足老年人(及其非正式护理人员)的需求,并探索将患者门户网站信息整合到电话交谈以及与医疗服务提供者面对面接触中的替代工作流程。

相似文献

1
Patient Portals as a Tool for Health Care Engagement: A Mixed-Method Study of Older Adults With Varying Levels of Health Literacy and Prior Patient Portal Use.患者门户网站作为促进医疗参与的工具:对健康素养水平不同且之前使用过患者门户网站的老年人的一项混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Mar 30;19(3):e99. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7099.
2
eHealth Literacy: Patient Engagement in Identifying Strategies to Encourage Use of Patient Portals Among Older Adults.电子健康素养:老年人参与确定鼓励使用患者门户网站的策略
Popul Health Manag. 2017 Dec;20(6):486-494. doi: 10.1089/pop.2016.0164. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
3
Barriers and Facilitators to Online Portal Use Among Patients and Caregivers in a Safety Net Health Care System: A Qualitative Study.安全网医疗系统中患者及照护者使用在线门户的障碍与促进因素:一项定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Dec 3;17(12):e275. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4847.
4
Communication matters: Exploring older adults' current use of patient portals.沟通至关重要:探究老年人当前对患者门户的使用情况。
Int J Med Inform. 2018 Dec;120:126-136. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.10.004. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
5
Engagement in Health Care From the Perspective of Older Adults.从老年人的角度看医疗保健的参与度。
Res Gerontol Nurs. 2021 May-Jun;14(3):138-149. doi: 10.3928/19404921-20210324-01. Epub 2021 May 1.
6
An Untapped Potential in Primary Care: Semi-Structured Interviews with Clinicians on How Patient Portals Will Work for Caregivers in the Safety Net.初级保健中的未开发潜力:与临床医生进行半结构化访谈,了解患者门户如何为安全网中的护理人员提供服务。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 20;22(7):e18466. doi: 10.2196/18466.
7
Patient Portals and Patient Engagement: A State of the Science Review.患者门户网站与患者参与度:科学现状综述
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jun 23;17(6):e148. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4255.
8
Older Adults' Experience Using Patient Portals in Communities: Challenges and Opportunities.老年人在社区使用患者门户网站的体验:挑战与机遇
Comput Inform Nurs. 2019 Jan;37(1):4-10. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000476.
9
Connecting Families to Their Health Record and Care Team: The Use, Utility, and Impact of a Client/Family Health Portal at a Children's Rehabilitation Hospital.将家庭与他们的健康记录及护理团队相连:一家儿童康复医院中客户/家庭健康门户的使用、效用及影响。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Apr 6;19(4):e97. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6811.
10
Implementing and Using a Patient Portal: A qualitative exploration of patient and provider perspectives on engaging patients.实施和使用患者门户网站:对患者和提供者关于吸引患者参与的观点进行定性探索。
J Innov Health Inform. 2016 Jul 4;23(2):848. doi: 10.14236/jhi.v23i2.848.

引用本文的文献

1
Toward Normalizing Inclusive Design by Uncovering Patient Experiences of a Web Portal in a Dental Hospital: Mixed Methods Study.通过揭示牙科医院网络门户的患者体验实现包容性设计常态化:混合方法研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 14;27:e74275. doi: 10.2196/74275.
2
Digital Disparities in Healthcare: A Tale of the Haves and Have-Nots?医疗保健中的数字鸿沟:富人与穷人的故事?
J Patient Exp. 2025 May 21;12:23743735251343585. doi: 10.1177/23743735251343585. eCollection 2025.
3
Disparities in Patient Portal Activation and Use in a Pediatric Emergency Department.

本文引用的文献

1
Online patient websites for electronic health record access among vulnerable populations: portals to nowhere?弱势群体中用于访问电子健康记录的在线患者网站:通向虚无的门户?
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Apr 1;24(e1):e47-e54. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw098.
2
Use of Patient Portals in Older Adults: A Comparison of Three Samples.老年人患者门户网站的使用:三个样本的比较。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2016;225:354-8.
3
The Digital Divide and Patient Portals: Internet Access Explained Differences in Patient Portal Use for Secure Messaging by Age, Race, and Income.
儿科急诊科患者门户激活与使用的差异
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2025 Aug 1;41(8):641-647. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000003398. Epub 2025 Apr 24.
4
Relationship Between the Use of Fitness Trackers and Smartwatches for Monitoring Physical Activity and the Sociodemographic Characteristics of Long-Term Care Residents During the COVID-19 Lockdown.新冠疫情封锁期间,健身追踪器和智能手表在监测长期护理机构居民身体活动方面的使用情况与社会人口学特征之间的关系。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Dec 25;61(1):6. doi: 10.3390/medicina61010006.
5
A systematic review of the effect of personal health records on patient activation.个人健康记录对患者激活作用的系统评价。
Digit Health. 2025 Jan 22;11:20552076251315295. doi: 10.1177/20552076251315295. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
6
Feasibility of a Web-Based and Mobile-Supported Follow-Up Treatment Pathway for Adult Patients With Orthopedic Trauma in the Netherlands: Concurrent Mixed Methods Study.荷兰成人骨科创伤患者基于网络和移动支持的后续治疗途径的可行性:同步混合方法研究
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Nov 26;8:e57579. doi: 10.2196/57579.
7
Toward Personalized Care and Patient Empowerment and Perspectives on a Personal Health Record in Hemophilia Care: Qualitative Interview Study.迈向血友病护理的个性化护理和患者赋权及个人健康记录的视角:定性访谈研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Sep 3;11:e48359. doi: 10.2196/48359.
8
Virtual Waiting Room: The New Narrative of Waiting in Oncology Care.虚拟候诊室:肿瘤护理中等待的新叙事
J Cancer Educ. 2025 Apr;40(2):303-312. doi: 10.1007/s13187-024-02496-9. Epub 2024 Sep 2.
9
Smartphone App Designed to Collect Health Information in Older Adults: Usability Study.智能手机应用程序设计用于收集老年人健康信息:可用性研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 May 30;11:e56653. doi: 10.2196/56653.
10
The Use of Digital Technologies in the Promotion of Health Literacy and Empowerment of Informal Caregivers: Scoping Review.数字技术在促进健康素养和赋权非正式照护者中的应用:范围综述。
JMIR Aging. 2024 Apr 29;7:e54913. doi: 10.2196/54913.
数字鸿沟与患者门户网站:互联网接入情况解释了不同年龄、种族和收入人群在使用患者门户网站进行安全信息交流方面的差异。
Med Care. 2016 Aug;54(8):772-9. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000560.
4
Design Considerations for Patient Portal Adoption by Low-Income, Older Adults.低收入老年人采用患者门户网站的设计考量
Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst. 2015 Apr;2015:3859-3868. doi: 10.1145/2702123.2702392.
5
Patients, care partners, and shared access to the patient portal: online practices at an integrated health system.患者、护理伙伴与患者门户网站的共享访问:综合医疗系统中的在线实践
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Nov;23(6):1150-1158. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw025. Epub 2016 Mar 28.
6
Use of Patient Portals for Personal Health Information Management: The Older Adult Perspective.使用患者门户网站进行个人健康信息管理:老年人的视角。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2015 Nov 5;2015:1234-41. eCollection 2015.
7
Differences in Access to and Preferences for Using Patient Portals and Other eHealth Technologies Based on Race, Ethnicity, and Age: A Database and Survey Study of Seniors in a Large Health Plan.基于种族、族裔和年龄的患者门户网站及其他电子健康技术的使用机会和偏好差异:一项针对大型健康计划中老年人的数据库及调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Mar 4;18(3):e50. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5105.
8
Refilling medications through an online patient portal: consistent improvements in adherence across racial/ethnic groups.通过在线患者门户重新配药:不同种族/族裔群体的依从性持续改善。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Apr;23(e1):e28-33. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv126. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
9
Patient Portals and Patient Engagement: A State of the Science Review.患者门户网站与患者参与度:科学现状综述
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jun 23;17(6):e148. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4255.
10
Low health literacy and evaluation of online health information: a systematic review of the literature.低健康素养与在线健康信息评估:文献系统综述
J Med Internet Res. 2015 May 7;17(5):e112. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4018.