Department of Cardiology, Isala Heart Center, Zwolle, the Netherlands (D.M.H., A.E., A.R.R.M., P.P.H.M.D., J.J.J.S., A.A., F.D., J.P.O.).
Cardiovascular Research Centre Maastricht, the Netherlands (H.J.J.W.).
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2020 Nov;13(11):e008484. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.120.008484. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
The randomized DAPA trial (Defibrillator After Primary Angioplasty) aimed to evaluate the survival benefit of prophylactic implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation in early selected high-risk patients after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction.
A randomized, multicenter, controlled trial compared ICD versus conventional medical therapy in high-risk patients with primary percutaneous coronary intervention, based on one of the following factors: left ventricular ejection fraction <30% within 4 days after ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, primary ventricular fibrillation, Killip class ≥2 or TIMI (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) flow <3 after percutaneous coronary intervention. ICD was implanted 30 to 60 days after MI. Primary end point was all-cause mortality at 3 years follow-up. The trial prematurely ended after inclusion of 266 patients (38% of the calculated sample size). Additional survival assessment was performed in February 2019 for the primary end point.
A total of 266 patients, 78.2% males, with a mean age of 60.8±11.3 years, were enrolled. One hundred thirty-one patients were randomized to the ICD arm and 135 patients to the control arm. All-cause mortality was significant lower in the ICD group (5% versus 13%, hazard ratio, 0.37 [95% CI, 0.15-0.95]) after 3 years follow-up. Appropriate ICD therapy occurred in 9 patients at 3 years follow-up (5 within the first 8 months after implantation). After a median long-term follow-up of 9 years (interquartile range, 3-11), total mortality (18% versus 38%; hazard ratio, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.37-0.91]), and cardiac mortality (hazard ratio, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.28-0.99]) was significant lower in the ICD group. Noncardiac death was not significantly different between groups. Left ventricular ejection fraction increased ≥10% in 46.5% of the patients during follow-up, and the extent of improvement was similar in both study groups.
In this prematurely terminated and thus underpowered randomized trial, early prophylactic ICD implantation demonstrated lower total and cardiac mortality in patients with high-risk ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Registration: URL: https://www.trialregister.nl; Unique identifier: Trial NL74 (NTR105).
DAPA 试验(经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的除颤器)旨在评估在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后早期选择的高危患者中预防性植入式心脏转复除颤器(ICD)植入的生存获益。
一项随机、多中心、对照试验比较了 ICD 与常规药物治疗在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的高危患者中的疗效,这些患者存在以下因素之一:ST 段抬高型心肌梗死后 4 天内左心室射血分数<30%,原发性室颤,Killip 分级≥2 级或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后 TIMI(心肌梗死溶栓)血流<3。ICD 在 MI 后 30 至 60 天植入。主要终点为 3 年随访时的全因死亡率。该试验在纳入 266 例患者(计算样本量的 38%)后提前结束。2019 年 2 月对主要终点进行了额外的生存评估。
共纳入 266 例患者,78.2%为男性,平均年龄为 60.8±11.3 岁。131 例患者被随机分入 ICD 组,135 例患者分入对照组。3 年随访时,ICD 组全因死亡率显著降低(5%比 13%,风险比 0.37[95%CI,0.15-0.95])。3 年随访时,9 例患者发生了合适的 ICD 治疗(植入后 8 个月内发生了 5 例)。中位随访 9 年后(四分位间距,3-11),ICD 组的总死亡率(18%比 38%;风险比 0.58[95%CI,0.37-0.91])和心源性死亡率(风险比 0.52[95%CI,0.28-0.99])显著降低。两组之间非心源性死亡无显著差异。在随访期间,46.5%的患者左心室射血分数增加≥10%,两组的改善程度相似。
在这项提前终止且因此效力不足的随机试验中,在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的高危 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中,早期预防性 ICD 植入可降低全因死亡率和心源性死亡率。注册:网址:https://www.trialregister.nl;唯一标识符:NTR105 号试验(NL74)。