Ursaru Andreea Maria, Petris Antoniu Octavian, Costache Irina Iuliana, Nicolae Ana, Crisan Adrian, Tesloianu Nicolae Dan
Department of Cardiology, Emergency Clinical Hospital "Sf. Spiridon", 700111 Iasi, Romania.
Department of Cardiology, "Grigore. T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700111 Iasi, Romania.
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2022 Apr 16;9(4):120. doi: 10.3390/jcdd9040120.
Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are the cornerstone of primary and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) all around the globe. In almost 40 years of technological advances and multiple clinical trials, there has been a continuous increase in the implantation rate. The purpose of this review is to highlight the grey areas related to actual ICD recommendations, focusing specifically on the primary prevention of SCD. We will discuss the still-existing controversies strongly reflected in the differences between the international guidelines regarding ICD indication class in non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, and also address the question of early implantation after myocardial infarction in the absence of clear protocols for patients at high risk of life-threatening arrhythmias. Correlating the insufficient data in the literature for 40-day waiting times with the increased risk of SCD in the first month after myocardial infarction, we review the pros and cons of early ICD implantation.
植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)是全球心脏性猝死(SCD)一级和二级预防的基石。在近40年的技术进步和多项临床试验中,植入率持续上升。本综述的目的是突出与ICD实际推荐相关的灰色地带,特别关注SCD的一级预防。我们将讨论国际指南在非缺血性心肌病ICD适应证分类方面的差异所强烈反映出的仍然存在的争议,还将探讨在缺乏针对有危及生命心律失常高风险患者的明确方案的情况下,心肌梗死后早期植入ICD的问题。将文献中关于40天等待时间的不足数据与心肌梗死后第一个月SCD风险增加相关联,我们回顾了早期植入ICD的利弊。