Saha Baibaswata, Bhattacharjee Surajit, Sarkar Arup, Bhor Renuka, Pai Kalpana, Bodhale Neelam
Centre of Advanced Study, Department of Zoology, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune 411007, India.
Department of Molecular Biology and Bioinformatics, Tripura Central University, Agartala, India.
Cytokine. 2021 Sep;145:155304. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2020.155304. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
Parasites of the genus Leishmania cause the disease leishmaniasis. As the sandfly vector transfers the promastigotes into the skin of the human host, the infection is either cured or exacerbated. In the process, there emerge several unsolved paradoxes of leishmaniasis. Chronologically, as the infections starts in skin, the role of the salivary proteins in supporting the infection or the host response to these proteins influencing the induction of immunological memory becomes a conundrum. As the parasite invokes inflammation, the infiltrating neutrophils may act as "Trojan Horse" to transfer parasites to macrophages that, along with dendritic cells, carry the parasite to lymphoid organs to start visceralization. As the visceralized infection becomes chronic, the acutely enhanced monocytopoiesis takes a downturn while neutropenia and thrombocytopenia ensue with concomitant rise in splenic colony-forming-units. These responses are accompanied by splenic and hepatic granulomas, polyclonal activation of B cells and deviation of T cell responses. The granuloma formation is both a containment process and a form of immunopathogenesis. The heterogeneity in neutrophils and macrophages contribute to both cure and progression of the disease. The differentiation of T-helper subsets presents another paradox of visceral leishmaniasis, as the counteractive T cell subsets influence the curing or non-curing outcome. Once the parasites are killed by chemotherapy, in some patients the cured visceral disease recurs as a cutaneous manifestation post-kala azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL). As no experimental model exists, the natural history of PKDL remains almost a black box at the end of the visceral disease.
利什曼原虫属的寄生虫会引发利什曼病。当白蛉媒介将前鞭毛体传播到人类宿主的皮肤中时,感染要么被治愈,要么恶化。在此过程中,出现了几个关于利什曼病尚未解决的矛盾现象。按时间顺序来看,由于感染始于皮肤,唾液蛋白在支持感染过程中的作用,或者宿主对这些蛋白的反应影响免疫记忆的诱导,就成了一个难题。随着寄生虫引发炎症,浸润的中性粒细胞可能充当“特洛伊木马”,将寄生虫转移到巨噬细胞,巨噬细胞与树突状细胞一起将寄生虫带到淋巴器官,从而引发内脏化。随着内脏化感染变为慢性,急性增强的单核细胞生成减少,同时出现中性粒细胞减少和血小板减少,伴随脾集落形成单位增加。这些反应伴有脾脏和肝脏肉芽肿、B细胞的多克隆激活以及T细胞反应的偏差。肉芽肿形成既是一种遏制过程,也是免疫发病机制的一种形式。中性粒细胞和巨噬细胞的异质性对疾病的治愈和进展都有影响。辅助性T细胞亚群的分化呈现出内脏利什曼病的另一个矛盾现象,因为相互拮抗的T细胞亚群会影响治愈或不治愈的结果。一旦通过化疗杀死寄生虫,在一些患者中,治愈的内脏疾病会以黑热病后皮肤利什曼病(PKDL)的皮肤表现形式复发。由于不存在实验模型,在内脏疾病末期,PKDL的自然病程几乎仍是一个未知领域。