• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

指定阻滞区行椎管内麻醉用于全关节置换术:提高手术室效率。

Spinal anesthesia in a designated block bay for total joint arthroplasty: improving operating room efficiency.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA

School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.

出版信息

Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2020 Dec;45(12):975-978. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2020-101773. Epub 2020 Oct 1.

DOI:10.1136/rapm-2020-101773
PMID:33004652
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Creating highly efficient operating room (OR) protocols for total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is a challenging and multifactorial process. We evaluated whether spinal anesthesia in a designated block bay (BBSA) would reduce time to incision, improve first case start time and decrease conversion to general anesthesia (GA).

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study on the first 86 TJA cases with BBSA from April to December 2018, compared with 344 TJA cases with spinal anesthesia performed in the OR (ORSA) during the same period. All TJA cases were included if the anesthetic plan was for spinal anesthesia. Patients were excluded if circumstances delayed start time or time to incision (advanced vascular access, pacemaker interrogation, surgeon availability). Data were extracted and analyzed via a linear mixed effects model to compare time to incision, via a Wilcoxon rank-sum test to compare first case start time, and via a Fisher's exact test to compare conversion to GA between the groups.

RESULTS

In the mixed effect model, the BBSA group time to incision was 5.37 min less than the ORSA group (p=0.018). The BBSA group had improved median first case start time (30.0 min) versus the ORSA group (40.5 min, p<0.0001). There was lower conversion to GA 2/86 (2.33%) in the BBSA group versus 36/344 (10.47%) in the ORSA group (p=0.018). No serious adverse events were noted in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

BBSA had limited impact on time to incision for TJA, with a small decrease for single OR days and no improvement on OR days with two rooms. BBSA was associated with improved first case start time and decreased rate of conversion to GA. Further research is needed to identify how BBSA affects the efficiency of TJA.

摘要

背景

为全膝关节置换术(TJA)创建高效的手术室(OR)方案是一个具有挑战性的多因素过程。我们评估了指定阻滞区(BBSA)中的脊髓麻醉是否会缩短切口时间、改善第一例手术开始时间并降低全麻(GA)的转化率。

方法

回顾性队列研究,纳入了 2018 年 4 月至 12 月期间在 BBSA 下进行的 86 例 TJA 病例,与同期在 OR 下进行的 344 例 TJA 病例进行比较。所有 TJA 病例均纳入研究,如果麻醉计划为脊髓麻醉。如果出现以下情况延迟了手术开始时间或切口时间(先进的血管通路、起搏器询问、外科医生的可用性),则排除患者。通过线性混合效应模型比较两组间的切口时间,通过 Wilcoxon 秩和检验比较第一例手术开始时间,通过 Fisher 精确检验比较两组间的 GA 转化率。

结果

在混合效应模型中,BBSA 组的切口时间比 ORSA 组少 5.37 分钟(p=0.018)。BBSA 组的中位第一例手术开始时间(30.0 分钟)优于 ORSA 组(40.5 分钟,p<0.0001)。BBSA 组的 GA 转化率为 2/86(2.33%),低于 ORSA 组的 36/344(10.47%)(p=0.018)。两组均未发生严重不良事件。

结论

BBSA 对 TJA 的切口时间影响有限,对于单间手术室的天数略有减少,而对于两间手术室的天数则没有改善。BBSA 与第一例手术开始时间的改善和全麻转化率的降低有关。需要进一步研究 BBSA 如何影响 TJA 的效率。

相似文献

1
Spinal anesthesia in a designated block bay for total joint arthroplasty: improving operating room efficiency.指定阻滞区行椎管内麻醉用于全关节置换术:提高手术室效率。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2020 Dec;45(12):975-978. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2020-101773. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
2
Does spinal anesthesia for total hip or knee arthroplasty entail longer operating room occupancy compared to general anesthesia? Case-control study of 337 spinal versus 243 general anesthesias.全髋关节或膝关节置换术的椎管内麻醉与全身麻醉相比需要更长的手术室占用时间吗?337 例椎管内麻醉与 243 例全身麻醉的病例对照研究。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2024 Apr;110(2):103794. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2023.103794. Epub 2023 Dec 9.
3
General vs Spinal Anesthesia for Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Single-Institution Observational Review.全麻与椎管内麻醉用于全膝关节置换术的比较:单中心观察性研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Apr;35(4):955-959. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.11.019. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
4
Operative room time comparison between general and spinal anesthesia in total hip arthroplasty: an institutional study.全髋关节置换术中全麻与脊麻手术间时间比较:一项机构研究。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Aug;143(8):4755-4761. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-04775-4. Epub 2023 Jan 25.
5
Developing a business case for a regional anesthesia block room: up with efficiency, down with costs.为区域麻醉阻滞室制定商业案例:提高效率,降低成本。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Nov;46(11):986-991. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2021-102545. Epub 2021 May 12.
6
Comparison of mortality and serious complications in lower extremity total joint arthroplasty patients with aortic stenosis receiving spinal versus general anesthesia.接受椎管内麻醉与全身麻醉的主动脉瓣狭窄下肢人工关节置换术患者的死亡率和严重并发症比较。
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2022;54(2):108-113. doi: 10.5114/ait.2022.117548.
7
Spinal versus general anesthesia for outpatient joint arthroplasty: can the evidence keep up with the patients?门诊关节置换术采用椎管内麻醉与全身麻醉的比较:证据能否跟上患者的需求?
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2020 Nov;45(11):934-936. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2020-101578. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
8
The Effect of Neuraxial Anesthesia on Postoperative Outcomes in Total Joint Arthroplasty With Rapid Recovery Protocols.在快速康复方案的全关节置换术中,椎管内麻醉对术后结局的影响。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Apr;35(4):950-954. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.11.037. Epub 2019 Nov 29.
9
Anesthesia Technique and Mortality after Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective, Propensity Score-matched Cohort Study.全髋关节或膝关节置换术后的麻醉技术与死亡率:一项回顾性、倾向评分匹配队列研究。
Anesthesiology. 2016 Oct;125(4):724-31. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001248.
10
Indications for Conversion of Spinal into General Anesthesia During Total Joint Arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术中椎管内麻醉改全身麻醉的适应证。
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2022 Dec;80(4):257-262.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of spinal versus general anesthesia on the variability of surgical times: a systematic review and meta-analysis.脊髓麻醉与全身麻醉对手术时间变异性的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Can J Anaesth. 2025 Jan;72(1):91-105. doi: 10.1007/s12630-024-02848-5. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
2
A Retrospective Analysis Investigating Whether Case Volume Experience of the Anesthesiologist Correlates with Intraoperative Efficiency for Joint Arthroplasty.一项回顾性分析研究,旨在探讨麻醉医师的手术量经验是否与关节置换术的术中效率相关。
J Med Syst. 2023 Nov 16;47(1):119. doi: 10.1007/s10916-023-02015-1.