Department of Psychology, The Catholic University of America, 620 Michigan Ave., N.E., Washington, DC 20064, USA.
Department of Psychology, The Catholic University of America, 620 Michigan Ave., N.E., Washington, DC 20064, USA.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2020 Oct;210:103169. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103169. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
Executive control of attention is important for goal-directed behavior, and it is influenced by emotional information. This study examined the effect of stimulus valence on a color word flanker task and how individual differences within a general population may affect task performance. 119 participants completed a color word flanker task with task-irrelevant emotional information (positive, negative, neutral). This task was followed by several self-report scales that measured individual differences in attention control ability (ACS), current mood (PANAS), and emotion regulation ability (DERS). Faster reaction times and greater accuracy were associated with negative stimuli. The flanker effect was greater for negative trials than for neutral and positive trials. The greater flanker effect for negative trials was driven by decreased reaction time on negative congruent trials. A significant interaction was evident between stimulus valence and ACS score, such that reaction time was faster for negative trials than for neutral trials among those with low, average, and high ACS. However, this difference was largest for those with high ACS. Further, these relationships between attention control ability and executive control of attention were influenced by level of depressive symptoms (as measured by BDI-II). This study extends our knowledge about the relationship between executive control of attention to emotional stimuli and individual differences related to mood and attentional disorders in a general population. Study results may have important implications for theoretical models of cognitive control and task-irrelevant emotional information across individual differences.
注意的执行控制对于目标导向的行为很重要,并且受到情绪信息的影响。本研究考察了刺激效价对颜色词干扰任务的影响,以及一般人群中的个体差异如何影响任务表现。119 名参与者完成了一项带有无关情绪信息(正性、负性、中性)的颜色词干扰任务。随后,他们完成了几个自我报告的量表,这些量表测量了注意力控制能力(ACS)、当前情绪(PANAS)和情绪调节能力(DERS)的个体差异。负性刺激与更快的反应时间和更高的准确性相关。负性试验的干扰效应大于中性和正性试验。负性试验的干扰效应更大是由于负性一致试验的反应时间减少所致。在刺激效价和 ACS 评分之间存在显著的交互作用,即 ACS 评分低、中、高的个体,负性试验的反应时间快于中性试验。然而,对于 ACS 评分高的个体,这种差异最大。此外,注意力控制能力与对无关情绪信息的执行控制之间的关系受到抑郁症状水平(BDI-II 测量)的影响。本研究扩展了我们对注意力的执行控制与情绪刺激之间关系的认识,并对一般人群中与情绪和注意力障碍相关的个体差异有了更深入的了解。研究结果可能对认知控制和无关情绪信息的个体差异理论模型具有重要意义。