Adelphi University, Gordon F Derner Institute of Advanced Psychological Studies, Garden City, NY, United States.
Adelphi University, Gordon F Derner Institute of Advanced Psychological Studies, Garden City, NY, United States.
Curr Opin Psychol. 2021 Aug;40:45-50. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.08.024. Epub 2020 Sep 6.
Multi-national and meta-analytic studies suggest that the pathways between religiousness and sexism/sexual prejudice are partially mediated by sociopersonality factors such as conservatism. In this article, we describe the contributing factors to this relationship, such as authoritarianism and fundamentalism. These factors interact at the dynamic nexus of individual and social development. As such, religiously situated sexism and sexual prejudice are not viewed as inevitable outcomes to religious practice and faith. Individual differences (e.g. conservatism), congregational (e.g. doctrine/policies, limited contact), and cultural factors (e.g. power hierarchies) mutually contribute to this landscape, and individuals ultimately make choices regarding their behavior and views. Further research exploring the mechanisms of religiously situated gender inequality and sexual prejudice is essential given the associated negative outcomes for individuals, relationships, and communities. Our growing grasp of the agentive pathways leading to religiously situated prejudice and discrimination is enriching our understanding of how individual differences and social contexts contribute to sexism and sexual prejudice.
多国和荟萃分析研究表明,宗教与性别歧视/性偏见之间的关系途径部分受到社会人格因素的影响,如保守主义。在本文中,我们描述了导致这种关系的因素,如独裁主义和原教旨主义。这些因素在个人和社会发展的动态交点上相互作用。因此,宗教背景下的性别歧视和性偏见并不是宗教实践和信仰的必然结果。个体差异(如保守主义)、会众(如教义/政策、有限接触)和文化因素(如权力等级制度)共同促成了这种局面,而个人最终会对自己的行为和观点做出选择。鉴于宗教背景下的性别不平等和性偏见所带来的负面影响,进一步探索宗教背景下性别不平等和性偏见的机制的研究至关重要。我们对导致宗教偏见和歧视的代理途径的理解不断加深,这丰富了我们对个体差异和社会环境如何导致性别歧视和性偏见的理解。