Falomir-Pichastor Juan M, Confino Dan, Anderson Joel R, Koc Yasin
Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Geneva, Boulevard du Pont d'Arve 40, 1205, Geneva, Switzerland.
Institute for Positive Psychology and Education, Australian Catholic University, Fitzroy, Australia.
Arch Sex Behav. 2025 Mar;54(3):1245-1259. doi: 10.1007/s10508-024-03070-6. Epub 2024 Dec 23.
Prior correlational studies have shown that belief in the biological theory of sexual orientation (BTSO) is associated with more positive attitudes toward homosexuality. However, individuals often interpret scientific evidence in ways that align with their pre-existing beliefs and motivations. This research experimentally investigated whether gender and religiosity moderate heterosexual individuals' responses to scientific evidence either supporting or refuting BTSO. In two studies, heterosexual men (Study 1, N = 118) and both men and women (Study 2, N = 280) reported their religiosity and were exposed to evidence suggesting either biological differences or similarities between heterosexual and gay individuals. Results showed that, in the biological differences condition, heterosexual women and less religious men were more likely to perceive homosexuality as a natural biological variation and expressed more positive attitudes toward it. In contrast, more religious men interpreted the same evidence as indicating a biological anomaly in gay individuals and displayed more negative attitudes toward homosexuality.
先前的相关性研究表明,对性取向生物学理论(BTSO)的信念与对同性恋更积极的态度相关。然而,个体常常以与他们既有的信念和动机相一致的方式来解释科学证据。本研究通过实验调查了性别和宗教信仰是否会调节异性恋个体对支持或反驳BTSO的科学证据的反应。在两项研究中,异性恋男性(研究1,N = 118)以及男性和女性(研究2,N = 280)报告了他们的宗教信仰,并接触到表明异性恋和同性恋个体之间存在生物学差异或相似性的证据。结果显示,在生物学差异的情况下,异性恋女性和宗教信仰较低的男性更有可能将同性恋视为一种自然的生物学变异,并对其表达出更积极的态度。相比之下,宗教信仰较强的男性将同样的证据解释为表明同性恋个体存在生物学异常,并对同性恋表现出更消极的态度。