Suppr超能文献

吸烟与根管治疗后牙齿拔除:系统评价与荟萃分析。

Cigarette Smoking and Root Filled Teeth Extraction: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Cabanillas-Balsera Daniel, Segura-Egea Juan J, Jiménez-Sánchez María C, Areal-Quecuty Victoria, Sánchez-Domínguez Benito, Montero-Miralles Paloma, Saúco-Márquez Juan J, Martín-González Jenifer

机构信息

Department of Stomatology, Section of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Sevilla, 41009 Sevilla, Spain.

Materials Science Institute of Sevilla (ICMS), Joint CSIC-University of Sevilla Center, 41092 Sevilla, Spain.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2020 Sep 30;9(10):3179. doi: 10.3390/jcm9103179.

Abstract

AIM

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the possible association between smoking habits and the occurrence of root-filled teeth (RFT) extraction.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome (PICO) question was in adult patients who had RFT, does the absence or presence of smoking habits affect the prevalence of extracted RFT? Systematic MEDLINE/PubMed, Wiley Online Database, Web of Science, and PRISMA protocol was used to evaluate and present the results. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system was used for certainty in the evidence. The risk of bias was assessed according to Cochrane Collaboration common scheme for bias and ROBINS-I tool. Cumulative meta-analysis was performed with a random effects model. PROSPERO registration code: CRD42020165279.

RESULTS

After search strategy, 571 articles were recovered, seven were selected for full-text analysis, and two reported data on inclusion criteria, including 516 RFT, 351 in non-smokers, and 165 in smoker subjects. The meta-analysis provided an odds ratio indicating significant association between smoking and the prevalence of extracted RFT (OR = 3.43, 95% CI = 1.17-10.05, = 0.02, I² = 64%). The certainty of the literature assessment was low per GRADE. Both studies were considered as moderate risk of bias.

CONCLUSIONS

Tobacco smoking should be considered a negative prognostic factor for the outcome of root canal treatment, although the quality of the evidence is low. RFT of smoking patients are three times more likely to be extracted. Continuing to smoke after endodontic treatment may increase the risk of treatment failure. However, the overall strength of evidence is low. This must be considered a limitation of the present study and the conclusion should be valued with caution.

摘要

目的

本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在研究吸烟习惯与根管充填牙(RFT)拔除之间的可能关联。

材料与方法

人群、干预措施、对照和结局(PICO)问题为:在患有RFT的成年患者中,吸烟习惯的有无是否会影响拔除的RFT的患病率?使用MEDLINE/PubMed、Wiley在线数据库、科学网和PRISMA协议来评估和呈现结果。采用推荐分级、评估、制定和评价(GRADE)系统来确定证据的确定性。根据Cochrane协作网的偏倚通用方案和ROBINS-I工具评估偏倚风险。采用随机效应模型进行累积荟萃分析。PROSPERO注册号:CRD42020165279。

结果

经过检索策略,共检索到571篇文章,7篇被选入进行全文分析,2篇报告了纳入标准的数据,包括516颗RFT,非吸烟者351颗,吸烟者165颗。荟萃分析得出的比值比表明吸烟与拔除的RFT患病率之间存在显著关联(OR = 3.43,95%CI = 1.17 - 10.05,P = 0.02,I² = 64%)。根据GRADE评估,文献评估的确定性较低。两项研究均被认为存在中度偏倚风险。

结论

尽管证据质量较低,但吸烟应被视为根管治疗结局的负面预后因素。吸烟患者的RFT被拔除的可能性高出三倍。根管治疗后继续吸烟可能会增加治疗失败的风险。然而,证据的总体强度较低。这必须被视为本研究的一个局限性,结论应谨慎看待。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a09/7601225/126265c49384/jcm-09-03179-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验