Center of Innovation for Long-Term Services and Supports, Providence Veterans Administration Medical Center, Providence, RI, USA; Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.
Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Nov;21(11):1718-1723. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.08.011. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
Describe how the availability of assisted living (AL) and dementia-specific AL vary across counties and correlate with demographic and socioeconomic characteristics.
Maps, univariate statistics, and standardized mean differences show the differences between counties with high and low levels of AL market penetration, and between counties with and without dementia-specific AL.
Data collected from state agencies on licensed AL communities, capacity, and geographic location, and population characteristics from the Area Health Resource file. We include novel and previously undescribed data on dementia-specific AL licenses in 21 states.
AL market penetration is reported as the number of AL units or beds per 1000 persons over age 65 years in a county.
In comparison to counties with the lowest AL penetration, high-penetration counties had higher high school and college education attainment (mean 25.3% vs 18.5%) and median annual income ($56,000 vs $46,800), and lower poverty (12.8% vs 17.3%) and unemployment rates (3.9% vs 5.1%). Compared to counties with AL but no dementia-specific care, counties with dementia care had substantially higher college attainment (24.6% vs 17.7%) and had higher urbanity index (3.8 vs 5.6 on a 1-9 scale, 1 most urban). Counties with dementia care also had, on average, 16% more in median household income ($54,200 vs $46,400) and 40% greater home value ($159,800 vs. $113,600).
Large socioeconomic disparities persist among counties without any AL or low penetration of AL in their borders in comparison to those with high AL penetration, as well as between counties with and without dementia-specific AL communities. There may be a mismatch in need and availability of residential care options for older adults with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias that contributes to the disproportionate share of racial/ethnic minorities with dementia in nursing homes. Lack of available AL beds in the communities where Medicaid individuals reside could make rebalancing efforts doubly difficult, in that Medicaid enrollees may be reluctant to move out of their neighborhoods.
描述辅助生活(AL)的可用性和专门针对痴呆症的 AL 如何在县与县之间存在差异,并与人口统计学和社会经济特征相关。
地图、单变量统计和标准化平均差异显示了 AL 市场渗透率高和低的县之间的差异,以及有无专门针对痴呆症的 AL 县之间的差异。
从州机构收集有关持牌 AL 社区、容量和地理位置的数据,以及来自区域卫生资源文件的人口特征数据。我们包括 21 个州以前未描述的专门针对痴呆症的 AL 许可证数据。
AL 市场渗透率报告为每 1000 名 65 岁以上人口中的 AL 单位或床位数量。
与 AL 渗透率最低的县相比,高渗透率县的高中和大学教育程度更高(分别为 25.3%和 18.5%),中位数年收入更高(分别为 56000 美元和 46800 美元),贫困率和失业率更低(分别为 12.8%和 17.3%)和 3.9%(分别为 5.1%)。与有 AL 但没有痴呆症护理的县相比,有痴呆症护理的县的大学教育程度明显更高(分别为 24.6%和 17.7%),城市指数也更高(在 1-9 分制中,分别为 3.8 和 5.6,1 分表示最城市化)。有痴呆症护理的县的家庭收入中位数也平均高出 16%(分别为 54200 美元和 46400 美元),房屋价值高出 40%(分别为 159800 美元和 113600 美元)。
与 AL 渗透率高的县相比,没有任何 AL 或 AL 渗透率低的县之间以及有和没有专门针对痴呆症的 AL 社区的县之间,仍然存在很大的社会经济差异。对于患有阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆症的老年人来说,居住护理选择的需求和供应可能存在不匹配,这导致少数族裔在养老院中所占比例不成比例。在 Medicaid 参保人居住的社区缺乏可用的 AL 床位,可能会使重新平衡努力变得更加困难,因为 Medicaid 参保人可能不愿意离开他们的社区。