Suppr超能文献

开发并验证临床医生和患者报告的光子数字量表,以评估臀部脂肪团严重程度。

Development and Validation Clinician and Patient Reported Photonumeric Scales to Assess Buttocks Cellulite Severity.

机构信息

AboutSkin Dermatology and DermSurgery, PC, Greenwood Village, Colorado.

Dermatology, University of California, Irvine, California.

出版信息

Dermatol Surg. 2020 Dec;46(12):1628-1635. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000002756.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Clinician Reported Photonumeric Cellulite Severity Scale (CR-PCSS) and Patient Reported PCSS (PR-PCSS) are newly developed tools for assessing cellulite severity.

OBJECTIVE

To report on the reliability, validity, and ability to detect a change in cellulite severity on the buttocks of adult women with the CR-PCSS and PR-PCSS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Content validity of both scales was established through concept elicitation and cognitive interviews. Test-retest reliability was evaluated, and intra-rater (both scales) and inter-rater (CR-PCSS only) reliability were estimated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for agreement and consistency. Ability to detect a change was determined using the Subject-Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) or Investigator-GAIS as anchors.

RESULTS

For the CR-PCSS (n = 6) at baseline and Day 2, the mean interrater ICCs were ≥0.70 and mean intrarater ICCs (95% confidence interval [CI]) were ≥0.81 (0.72-0.90) for both buttocks. For the PR-PCSS (n = 99) at baseline and Day 14, the mean test-retest reliability ICCs (95% CI) were ≥0.86 (0.79-0.91) for both buttocks. A clinically meaningful change was 1.0 point on the PR-PCSS and 1.0 on the CR-PCSS.

CONCLUSION

The CR-PCSS and PR-PCSS reliably assess cellulite severity of the buttocks and can detect a clinically meaningful change after treatment for cellulite.

摘要

背景

临床报告光子数字脂肪团严重程度量表(CR-PCSS)和患者报告 PCSS(PR-PCSS)是新开发的评估脂肪团严重程度的工具。

目的

报告 CR-PCSS 和 PR-PCSS 对成年女性臀部脂肪团严重程度的可靠性、有效性和变化检测能力。

材料和方法

通过概念启发和认知访谈确定了这两个量表的内容效度。评估了测试-重测信度,使用组内相关系数(ICC)评估了组内(两个量表)和组间(仅 CR-PCSS)的信度,以评估一致性。使用受试者总体美学改善量表(GAIS)或研究者 GAIS 作为锚定来确定检测变化的能力。

结果

对于 CR-PCSS(n = 6)在基线和第 2 天,臀部的平均组间 ICC 均≥0.70,平均组内 ICC(95%置信区间[CI])均≥0.81(0.72-0.90)。对于 PR-PCSS(n = 99)在基线和第 14 天,臀部的平均测试-重测可靠性 ICC(95%CI)均≥0.86(0.79-0.91)。PR-PCSS 的临床有意义变化为 1.0 分,CR-PCSS 为 1.0 分。

结论

CR-PCSS 和 PR-PCSS 可靠地评估臀部脂肪团的严重程度,并且可以在治疗脂肪团后检测到临床有意义的变化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0ba/7685927/92080e89f50b/ds-46-1628-g001.jpg

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
Cellulite: a review of pathogenesis-directed therapy.橘皮组织:针对发病机制的治疗综述。
Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2017 Dec;36(4):179-184. doi: 10.12788/j.sder.2017.031.
5
Cellulite: a review with a focus on subcision.橘皮组织:一篇聚焦于皮下分离术的综述
Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2017 Jan 7;10:17-23. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S95830. eCollection 2017.
7
Cellfina observations: pearls and pitfalls.Cellfina观察结果:要点与陷阱
Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2015 Sep;34(3):144-6. doi: 10.12788/j.sder.2015.0176.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验