• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Closing the Loop: Program Description and Qualitative Analysis of a Pediatric Posttransfer Follow-up and Feedback Program.闭环:儿科转科后随访和反馈计划的程序描述和定性分析。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2021 Dec 1;37(12):e1535-e1543. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000002108.
2
Minding the Gap: A Qualitative Study of Provider Experience to Optimize Care for Critically Ill Children in General Emergency Departments.弥合差距:一项定性研究,旨在优化普通急诊部门中危重症儿童的护理,以优化护理,提高服务质量。
Acad Emerg Med. 2019 Jul;26(7):803-813. doi: 10.1111/acem.13624. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
3
A Qualitative Analysis of General Emergency Medicine Providers' Perceptions on Pediatric Emergency Telemedicine.对普通急诊医学提供者对儿科急诊远程医疗看法的定性分析
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2019 Dec;35(12):856-861. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001067.
4
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
5
A Qualitative Study Examining Stakeholder Perspectives of a Local Child Abuse Program in Community Emergency Departments.一项定性研究,探讨社区急诊部门中地方虐待儿童项目相关利益方的观点。
Acad Pediatr. 2019 May-Jun;19(4):438-445. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2019.01.006. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
6
A Grounded Theory Qualitative Analysis of Interprofessional Providers' Perceptions on Caring for Critically Ill Infants and Children in Pediatric and General Emergency Departments.一项基于扎根理论的定性分析:跨专业医疗服务提供者对儿科和综合急诊科中危重症婴幼儿护理的看法
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2018 Aug;34(8):578-583. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000906.
7
The Impact of a Multifaceted Simulation Education and Feedback Program for Community Emergency Departments on Pediatric Diabetic Ketoacidosis Management.多方面模拟教育和反馈计划对社区急诊科儿科糖尿病酮症酸中毒管理的影响。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2023 Jun 1;39(6):413-417. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000002961.
8
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
9
"These Are Our Kids": Qualitative Interviews With Clinical Leaders in General Emergency Departments on Motivations, Processes, and Guidelines in Pediatric Sepsis Care."这些是我们的孩子":普通急诊科室临床负责人的定性访谈,内容关于小儿脓毒症护理的动机、流程和指南。
Ann Emerg Med. 2022 Oct;80(4):347-357. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2022.05.030. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
10
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Blueprint for community emergency department pediatric simulation.社区急诊科儿科模拟蓝图。
AEM Educ Train. 2023 Nov 30;7(6):e10925. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10925. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
A QI Partnership to Decrease CT Use for Pediatric Appendicitis in the Community Hospital Setting.一项旨在减少社区医院环境中儿童阑尾炎CT使用的质量改进合作项目。
Pediatr Qual Saf. 2021 Sep 24;6(5):e479. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000479. eCollection 2021 Sep-Oct.
3
Bridging the feedback gap: a sociotechnical approach to informing clinicians of patients' subsequent clinical course and outcomes.弥合反馈差距:一种告知临床医生患者后续临床病程及结果的社会技术方法。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2021 Jul;30(7):591-597. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-012464. Epub 2021 May 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding Barriers to Telemedicine Implementation in Rural Emergency Departments.理解农村急诊科实施远程医疗的障碍。
Ann Emerg Med. 2020 Mar;75(3):392-399. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.06.026. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
2
Emergency Department Pediatric Readiness and Mortality in Critically Ill Children.急诊儿科准备情况与危重症患儿死亡率的关系
Pediatrics. 2019 Sep;144(3). doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-0568.
3
Impact of Project ECHO on Community ED Providers' Perceptions of Child Abuse Knowledge and Access to Subspecialists for Child Abuse and Neglect.项目ECHO对社区急诊科医护人员关于虐待儿童知识认知及获取虐待和忽视儿童问题专科医生服务的影响。
Acad Pediatr. 2019 Nov-Dec;19(8):985-987. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2019.06.018. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
4
A Qualitative Study of Risks Related to Interhospital Transfer of Patients with Nontraumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage.非创伤性颅内出血患者院际转运相关风险的定性研究
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019 Jun;28(6):1759-1766. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.12.048. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
5
The Path to Diagnostic Excellence Includes Feedback to Calibrate How Clinicians Think.通往卓越诊断的道路包括反馈,以校准临床医生的思维方式。
JAMA. 2019 Feb 26;321(8):737-738. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.0113.
6
A Qualitative Study Examining Stakeholder Perspectives of a Local Child Abuse Program in Community Emergency Departments.一项定性研究,探讨社区急诊部门中地方虐待儿童项目相关利益方的观点。
Acad Pediatr. 2019 May-Jun;19(4):438-445. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2019.01.006. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
7
A national survey of telemedicine use by US emergency departments.美国急诊部门远程医疗使用情况的全国性调查。
J Telemed Telecare. 2020 Jun;26(5):278-284. doi: 10.1177/1357633X18816112. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
8
Pediatric Readiness in the Emergency Department.儿科在急诊科的准备情况。
Pediatrics. 2018 Nov;142(5). doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-2459.
9
Minding the Gap: A Qualitative Study of Provider Experience to Optimize Care for Critically Ill Children in General Emergency Departments.弥合差距:一项定性研究,旨在优化普通急诊部门中危重症儿童的护理,以优化护理,提高服务质量。
Acad Emerg Med. 2019 Jul;26(7):803-813. doi: 10.1111/acem.13624. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
10
Real-Time Surveys Reveal Important Safety Risks During Interhospital Care Transitions for Neurologic Emergencies.实时调查揭示了神经急症院际护理转接期间的重要安全风险。
Am J Med Qual. 2019 Jan/Feb;34(1):53-58. doi: 10.1177/1062860618785248. Epub 2018 Jul 10.

闭环:儿科转科后随访和反馈计划的程序描述和定性分析。

Closing the Loop: Program Description and Qualitative Analysis of a Pediatric Posttransfer Follow-up and Feedback Program.

机构信息

From the Section of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.

出版信息

Pediatr Emerg Care. 2021 Dec 1;37(12):e1535-e1543. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000002108.

DOI:10.1097/PEC.0000000000002108
PMID:33009320
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8012401/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Follow-up and feedback foster improvement. General emergency medicine providers working in community hospitals desire follow-up and feedback on pediatric patients transferred to children's hospitals. We implemented a novel program to provide these data to our colleagues. The objective of this study was to explore stakeholder perspectives of our program.

METHODS

We provided secure, electronic reports on transfers from 7 general emergency departments (GEDs). Patient follow-up and feedback data were delivered to the GED's pediatric emergency care coordinator. Seven pediatric emergency care coordinators and 2 children's hospital liaisons participated in semistructured interviews. Five researchers coded and analyzed transcribed data using the constant comparative method of grounded theory. Codes were refined and clustered to develop themes.

RESULTS

Perceived values of the program included GED appreciation of closing the loop on transferred patients, providing education, and informing quality improvement. Participants valued the concise and timely nature of the reports and their empathetic delivery. Facilitators of program implementation included established professional relationships between the GED and the children's hospital liaisons and a GED's culture of self-inquiry. Barriers to program implementation included potential medicolegal exposure and the time burden for report generation and processing. Suggested programmatic improvements included focusing on generalizable, evidence-based learning points and analyzing care trends.

CONCLUSIONS

Stakeholders of our pediatric posttransfer follow-up and feedback program reported many benefits and provided key suggestions that may promote successful dissemination of similar programs nationwide. Examining data trends in transferred children may focus efforts to improve the care of children across all emergency care settings.

摘要

目的

随访和反馈有助于改进。在社区医院工作的普通急诊医师希望对转至儿童医院的儿科患者进行随访和反馈。我们实施了一项新计划来为我们的同事提供这些数据。本研究的目的是探讨利益相关者对我们计划的看法。

方法

我们为 7 个普通急诊部(GED)提供了有关转院的安全、电子报告。患者随访和反馈数据被传递给 GED 的儿科急救护理协调员。7 名儿科急救护理协调员和 2 名儿童医院联络人参加了半结构化访谈。5 名研究人员使用扎根理论的恒定性比较方法对转录数据进行编码和分析。对代码进行了精炼和聚类,以开发主题。

结果

该计划的感知价值包括 GED 对转院患者的闭环、提供教育和告知质量改进的感激之情。参与者重视报告的简洁和及时性以及其富有同理心的传递方式。该计划实施的促进因素包括 GED 与儿童医院联络人之间既定的专业关系以及 GED 的自我探究文化。该计划实施的障碍包括潜在的医疗法律风险暴露以及报告生成和处理的时间负担。建议的计划改进包括关注可推广的、基于证据的学习要点以及分析护理趋势。

结论

我们的儿科转院后随访和反馈计划的利益相关者报告了许多益处,并提供了可能促进全国类似计划成功传播的关键建议。分析转院儿童的护理数据趋势可能会集中精力改善所有急诊护理环境中儿童的护理。