• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Bridging the feedback gap: a sociotechnical approach to informing clinicians of patients' subsequent clinical course and outcomes.

作者信息

Cifra Christina L, Sittig Dean F, Singh Hardeep

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of Iowa Roy J and Lucille A Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA

School of Biomedical Informatics, Center for Healthcare Quality and Safety, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Qual Saf. 2021 Jul;30(7):591-597. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-012464. Epub 2021 May 6.

DOI:10.1136/bmjqs-2020-012464
PMID:33958442
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8237185/
Abstract
摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a70/8237185/ac627424b952/bmjqs-2020-012464f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a70/8237185/ac627424b952/bmjqs-2020-012464f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a70/8237185/ac627424b952/bmjqs-2020-012464f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Bridging the feedback gap: a sociotechnical approach to informing clinicians of patients' subsequent clinical course and outcomes.弥合反馈差距：一种告知临床医生患者后续临床病程及结果的社会技术方法。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2021 Jul;30(7):591-597. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-012464. Epub 2021 May 6.
2
A qualitative study of the variable effects of audit and feedback in the ICU.对重症监护病房中审核与反馈的可变效应的定性研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Jun;24(6):393-9. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-003978. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
3
Reducing the knowledge to action gap in hospital nutrition care - Developing and implementing nutritionDay 2.0.缩小医院营养护理中知识与行动的差距——开发并实施“营养日2.0”
Clin Nutr. 2021 Mar;40(3):936-945. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2020.06.021. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
4
Testing a novel audit and feedback method for hand hygiene compliance: A multicenter quality improvement study.测试一种新的手卫生依从性审核和反馈方法：一项多中心质量改进研究。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2019 Jan;40(1):89-94. doi: 10.1017/ice.2018.277. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
5
Impetus to change: a multi-site qualitative exploration of the national audit of dementia.变革的动力：一项全国痴呆症审计的多地点定性探索。
Implement Sci. 2020 Jun 17;15(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01004-z.
6
[Audit and feedback, and continuous quality improvement strategies to improve the quality of care for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of literature].[审核与反馈以及持续质量改进策略以提高2型糖尿病护理质量：文献系统综述]
Epidemiol Prev. 2016 Mar-Apr;40(3-4):215-23. doi: 10.19191/EP16.3-4.AD05.079.
7
When is audit and feedback effective in dementia care? A systematic review.何时进行审计和反馈对痴呆症护理有效？系统综述。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Mar;79:27-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.10.013. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
8
Regional needs assessment for emergency physician audit and feedback.急诊医师审核与反馈的区域需求评估
CJEM. 2020 Jul;22(4):542-548. doi: 10.1017/cem.2020.348.
9
Evaluation of Barriers to Audit-and-Feedback Programs That Used Direct Observation of Hand Hygiene Compliance: A Qualitative Study.评价基于直接观察手卫生依从性的审核反馈项目的障碍：一项定性研究。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Oct 5;1(6):e183344. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.3344.
10
Impact on maternity professionals of novel approaches to clinical audit feedback.新型临床审计反馈方法对产科专业人员的影响。
Eval Health Prof. 2007 Mar;30(1):75-95. doi: 10.1177/0163278706297337.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial intelligence and machine learning in spine care: Advancing precision diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation.脊柱护理中的人工智能与机器学习：推动精准诊断、治疗和康复
World J Orthop. 2025 Aug 18;16(8):107064. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i8.107064.
2
Leveraging artificial intelligence to reduce diagnostic errors in emergency medicine: Challenges, opportunities, and future directions.利用人工智能减少急诊医学中的诊断错误：挑战、机遇与未来方向。
Acad Emerg Med. 2025 Mar;32(3):327-339. doi: 10.1111/acem.15066. Epub 2024 Dec 15.
3
Rising to the Challenge of Rare Diagnoses.

本文引用的文献

1
Closing the Loop: Program Description and Qualitative Analysis of a Pediatric Posttransfer Follow-up and Feedback Program.闭环：儿科转科后随访和反馈计划的程序描述和定性分析。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2021 Dec 1;37(12):e1535-e1543. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000002108.
2
A Program to Provide Clinicians with Feedback on Their Diagnostic Performance in a Learning Health System.在学习型医疗体系中为临床医生提供诊断表现反馈的项目。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2021 Feb;47(2):120-126. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2020.08.014. Epub 2020 Aug 29.
3
GP perspectives on hospital discharge letters: an interview and focus group study.
应对罕见病诊断的挑战。
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Mar;40(4):918-921. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-09086-x. Epub 2024 Nov 1.
4
Positioning the surgical patient - roles, responsibilities and challenges. A qualitative study.手术患者的体位摆放——角色、职责与挑战。一项定性研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Feb;81(2):968-977. doi: 10.1111/jan.16278. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
5
Feedback for Emergency Ambulance Staff: A National Review of Current Practice Informed by Realist Evaluation Methodology.对急救人员的反馈：基于现实主义评估方法的全国现行实践综述。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Aug 8;11(16):2229. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11162229.
6
Cognitive perspectives on maintaining physicians' medical expertise: I. Reimagining Maintenance of Certification to promote lifelong learning.认知视角下的医师医学专长维持：一、重新构想以促进终身学习为目的的继续医学教育认证。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2023 Jul 24;8(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s41235-023-00496-9.
7
Qualitative study of international key informants' perspectives on the current and future state of healthcare quality measurement and feedback.国际主要信息提供者对当前和未来医疗保健质量衡量和反馈状况的看法的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jun 7;13(6):e073697. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073697.
8
Types and effects of feedback for emergency ambulance staff: a systematic mixed studies review and meta-analysis.急救车工作人员的反馈类型和效果：系统混合研究综述和荟萃分析。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2023 Oct;32(10):573-588. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2022-015634. Epub 2023 Apr 7.
9
Electronic Health Records That Support Health Professional Reflective Practice: a Missed Opportunity in Digital Health.支持医疗专业人员反思性实践的电子健康记录：数字健康领域错失的机遇。
J Healthc Inform Res. 2023 Jan 20;6(4):375-384. doi: 10.1007/s41666-022-00123-0. eCollection 2022 Dec.
10
Prehospital Stroke Care Part 1: Emergency Medical Services and the Stroke Systems of Care.院前卒中护理第一部分：急诊医疗服务和卒中护理系统。
Stroke. 2023 Apr;54(4):1138-1147. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.039586. Epub 2022 Nov 29.
全科医生对医院出院小结的看法：一项访谈与焦点小组研究
BJGP Open. 2020 Jun 23;4(2). doi: 10.3399/bjgpopen20X101031. Print 2020.
4
Revitalising audit and feedback to improve patient care.振兴审核和反馈以改善患者护理。
BMJ. 2020 Feb 27;368:m213. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m213.
5
Thresholds, rules and defensive strategies: how physicians learn from their prior diagnosis-related experiences.阈值、规则和防御策略：医生如何从先前与诊断相关的经验中学习。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2020 May 26;7(2):115-121. doi: 10.1515/dx-2019-0025.
6
Improving Resident Feedback on Diagnostic Reasoning after Handovers: The LOOP Project.交接班后提高住院医师对诊断推理的反馈：LOOP 项目。
J Hosp Med. 2019 Oct 1;14(10):622-625. doi: 10.12788/jhm.3262. Epub 2019 Aug 16.
7
Clinical Performance Feedback Intervention Theory (CP-FIT): a new theory for designing, implementing, and evaluating feedback in health care based on a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative research.临床绩效反馈干预理论（CP-FIT）：基于系统评价和定性研究的元综合，为医疗保健中设计、实施和评估反馈而提出的一个新理论。
Implement Sci. 2019 Apr 26;14(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0883-5.
8
The Challenges of Providing Feedback to Referring Physicians After Discovering Their Medical Errors.发现转诊医生的医疗错误后向其提供反馈的挑战。
J Surg Res. 2018 Dec;232:209-216. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.06.038. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
9
"Closing the loop": a mixed-methods study about resident learning from outcome feedback after patient handoffs.“闭环”：一项关于住院医师从患者交接后的结果反馈中学习的混合方法研究。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2018 Nov 27;5(4):235-242. doi: 10.1515/dx-2018-0013.
10
Health Information Exchange Use (1990-2015): A Systematic Review.健康信息交换的使用情况（1990 - 2015年）：一项系统综述。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2017 Dec 7;5(1):27. doi: 10.5334/egems.249.