• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药物难治性格雷夫斯眼病行眶外侧减压术的疗效如何。

How Effective is Superolateral Orbital Decompression in Cases of Drug-Resistant Graves' Ophthalmopathy.

机构信息

Military Medical Academy, Sofia, Bulgaria.

出版信息

Folia Med (Plovdiv). 2020 Sep 30;62(3):462-467. doi: 10.3897/folmed.62.e49313.

DOI:10.3897/folmed.62.e49313
PMID:33009740
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Graves' ophthalmopathy (GO) is the most common and difficult-to-treat extrathyroidal symptom of Graves' disease. Though retraction of the upper eyelid is the most common clinical feature of GO, it can have a much more severe clinical manifesta-tion with symptoms such as conjunctival chemosis, keratopathy, extraocular muscle dysfunction, proptosis of the bulb and dysthyroid optic neuropathy. Treatment methods include control of the thyroid function, corticosteroid and immunosuppressive therapy as well as radiotherapy. These approaches are ineffective in one-third of cases, with patients being refractory to all aforementioned therapeutic modalities. In these cases, surgical decompression of the orbit is in order.The spectrum of surgical techniques is wide and varies from decompression of the lateral wall of the orbit to decompression via removal of all four orbital walls. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the results of superolateral orbital decompression.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study is retrospective and covers the period from January 2009 to January 2019. During that period eight patients with Graves' ophthalmopathy underwent surgery and were followed up in the Department of Neurosurgery in the Mili-tary Medical Academy, Sofia. The mean age of the patients was 57 years, with the youngest being 30 years old and the oldest - 74 years old. The gender distribution was 1.6/1 with predominance in females (5 women and 3 men). The surgical approach we used is a com-bination of lateral and upper orbitotomy and was described in detail by Al-Mefty. All of patients underwent ophthalmic examinations in the pre- and postoperative period, with special attention to their visual acuity, the condition of the eyelid and the width of the ocular slit. Exophthalmometry was obtained via Hertel's method. The participants in this study are followed for a period of six months after the operation.

RESULTS

All eight patients underwent superolateral orbitotomy. There were a total of ten orbital decompressions. Improvement of visual acuity and reduction of the proptosis were reported in all other surgically treated patients. The mean reported improvement of visual acuity (measured via Snellen's method) was 0.27±0.17. The mean reported a reduction of proptosis was 7.53±2.58 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the surgical techniques for orbital decompression we used have significant disadvantages, they remain the only alternative in order to avoid the complication of severe GO.

摘要

介绍

甲状腺眼病(GO)是 Graves 病最常见且最难治疗的甲状腺外症状。虽然上睑退缩是 GO 最常见的临床特征,但它可能有更严重的临床表现,如结膜水肿、角膜病变、眼外肌功能障碍、球突出和甲状腺相关视神经病变。治疗方法包括控制甲状腺功能、皮质类固醇和免疫抑制治疗以及放射治疗。这些方法在三分之一的病例中无效,患者对所有上述治疗方法均有抗药性。在这些情况下,需要进行眼眶减压手术。手术技术范围广泛,从眼眶外侧壁减压到通过去除所有四个眼眶壁进行减压。本研究的目的是评估超外侧眼眶减压术的结果。

患者和方法

该研究是回顾性的,涵盖了 2009 年 1 月至 2019 年 1 月期间的时间段。在此期间,8 例 Graves 眼病患者在索菲亚军事医学科学院神经外科接受了手术治疗,并接受了随访。患者的平均年龄为 57 岁,年龄最小的为 30 岁,年龄最大的为 74 岁。性别分布为 1.6/1,女性居多(5 名女性和 3 名男性)。我们使用的手术方法是外侧和上眶切开术的组合,由 Al-Mefty 详细描述。所有患者在术前和术后都进行了眼科检查,特别注意他们的视力、眼睑状况和眼裂宽度。通过 Hertel 法获得眼球突出度。本研究的参与者在手术后 6 个月内进行随访。

结果

所有 8 例患者均行超外侧眶切开术。共进行了 10 次眼眶减压术。所有接受手术治疗的患者均报告视力改善和眼球突出度减小。报告的平均视力改善(通过 Snellen 法测量)为 0.27±0.17。报告的平均眼球突出度减小为 7.53±2.58 毫米。

结论

尽管我们使用的眼眶减压手术技术有明显的缺点,但它们仍然是避免严重 GO 并发症的唯一选择。

相似文献

1
How Effective is Superolateral Orbital Decompression in Cases of Drug-Resistant Graves' Ophthalmopathy.药物难治性格雷夫斯眼病行眶外侧减压术的疗效如何。
Folia Med (Plovdiv). 2020 Sep 30;62(3):462-467. doi: 10.3897/folmed.62.e49313.
2
Outcomes of endoscopic orbital decompression for graves' ophthalmopathy.内镜眼眶减压术治疗格雷夫斯眼病的疗效。
Ir J Med Sci. 2020 Feb;189(1):177-183. doi: 10.1007/s11845-019-02043-2. Epub 2019 Jun 16.
3
Customized Orbital Decompression Surgery Combined with Eyelid Surgery or Strabismus Surgery in Mild to Moderate Thyroid-associated Ophthalmopathy.定制眼眶减压手术联合眼睑手术或斜视手术治疗轻至中度甲状腺相关性眼病
Korean J Ophthalmol. 2016 Feb;30(1):1-9. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2016.30.1.1. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
4
[Orbital-bony decompression in patients with dysthyroid orbitopathy--first Croatian experiences].[甲状腺功能障碍性眼眶病患者的眼眶减压术——克罗地亚的首次经验]
Acta Med Croatica. 2006;60(2):83-6.
5
Graded decompression of orbital fat and wall in patients with Graves' orbitopathy.格雷夫斯眼眶病患者眼眶脂肪和眶壁的分级减压术
Korean J Ophthalmol. 2014 Feb;28(1):1-11. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2014.28.1.1. Epub 2014 Jan 21.
6
Surgical Treatment of Dysthyroid Optic Neuropathy: Long-Term Visual Outcomes with Comparison of 2-Wall versus 3-Wall Orbital Decompression.甲状腺相关性视神经病变的外科治疗:两壁与三壁眼眶减压术的长期视力预后比较
Curr Eye Res. 2016;41(2):159-64. doi: 10.3109/02713683.2015.1008641. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
7
[Modified orbital decompression for severe thyroid associated ophthalmopathy].[改良眼眶减压术治疗重度甲状腺相关性眼病]
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Mar;49(3):242-9.
8
Ultrasonic bone removal versus high-speed burring for lateral orbital decompression: comparison of surgical outcomes for the treatment of thyroid eye disease.超声骨刀与高速磨钻在下颌骨眶距增宽症截骨术中的应用:比较两种手术方法治疗甲状腺相关眼病的效果。
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Mar-Apr;26(2):83-7. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0b013e3181b8e614.
9
Follow-up of transnasal orbital decompression in severe Graves' ophthalmopathy.重度格雷夫斯眼病经鼻眼眶减压术的随访
Ophthalmology. 2001 Feb;108(2):400-4. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00533-9.
10
[Efficacy and Side Effects of Lateral Orbital Wall Decompression Including the Orbital Rim in Patients with Graves' Orbitopathy].[包括眶缘在内的外侧眶壁减压术治疗Graves眼病的疗效及副作用]
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2019 Jan;236(1):17-24. doi: 10.1055/a-0802-9275. Epub 2019 Jan 28.